符号域中的对称：一个类型学研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当前符号学正将关注点从符号和文本转向整个文化，需要开发出一种比较连贯的研究方法。本文试图通过应用针对分形的拓扑学理论，以分析符号域中的各类对称。本文将分形界定为两个拓扑结构之间的相似，通过比较视觉和概念模式，思考所谓的“相似”究竟是什么，并基于对旋转对称、平移对称和反射对称的拓扑学分析，建立分形相似性的类型学。为说明每一种类型，本文从文化和政治领域寻找分析案例。最后假设，文化符号学可以演变成一种“模式科学”，并挑战传统研究中自然和文化的学科分野。

关键词: 符号学, 文化, 分形

Abstract: The article points out that the current expansion of the semiotic focus from signs and texts to whole cultures needs the development of a coherent method. It therefore proposes to establish the method through an application of the topological theory of fractals to the analysis of different kinds of symmetries in the semiosphere. Having defined fractals as resemblance between two topological structures, the article first dwells on what "resemblance" means in the comparison of both visual and conceptual patterns; it then proposes a typology of fractal similarities, based on the topological operations of rotation, translation, and reflection. Examples of each typology are given from the fields of cultural and political analysis. The article concludes by hypothesizing that cultural semiotics might evolve into a "pattern science", challenging the customary disciplinary barriers between the study of regularities in nature and in culture.

Key words: semiotics, culture, fractals

马西莫·里奥尼 . 符号域中的对称：一个类型学研究[J]. 文艺理论研究.

Massimo Leone . Symmetries in the Semiosphere: A Typology[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art.

[1]Arbib, Michael A., and Giacomo Rizzolatti.“Language within Our Grasp.”Trends in Neurosciences 31.5 (1998) :188-94. [2]Calabrese, Omar.L'etàneobarocca.Trans.Charles Lambert.Rome-Bari:Laterza, 1992. [3]---.Neo-Baroque:A Sign of the Times;with a foreword by Umberto Eco.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1987. [4]Frame, Michael, and Amelia Urry.Fractal Worlds:Grown, Built, and Imagined.New Haven, CT and London:Yale University Press, 2016. [5]Greimas, Algirdas Julien.Du sens.Paris:Seuil, 1970. [6]Leone, Massimo.“La sfera e il linguaggio:Topologie della cultura”.Forme e formalizzazione, Proceedings of the16thCongress of the Italian Society for the Philosophy of Language Eds.Gola Elisabetta, and Gian Pietro Storari.Cagliari:CUEC, 2010.67-74. [7]---.“Motility, Potentiality, and Infinity:A Semiotic Hypothesis on Nature and Religion.”Biosemiotics 5.3 (2011) :369-89. [8]---.“From Theory to Analysis:Forethoughts on Cultural Semiotics.”From Analysis to Theory:Afterthoughts on the Semiotics of Culture, eds.Valentina Pisanty and Stefano Traini.Monographic issue of Versus 114 (2012) :23-38. [9]---.“Semiotica della reputazione.”As intera97es sensíveis:Ensaios de sóciossemiótica a partir da obra de Eric Landowski.Ed.Ana Claudia de Oliveira.S2o Paulo:Editions Esta92o das Letras e Cores and Editora CPS, 2013.285-308. [10]---.Sémiotique du fondamentalisme religieux:messages, rhétorique, force persuasive.Paris:L'Harmattan, 2014. [11]---.“El murmullo de la cultura:semiótica y sentido de la vida.”Religación:Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 2 (2016) :110-27. [12]---. (Forthcoming) “Rationality and Reasonableness in Textual Interpretation”, forthcoming.Semiotics and Communication.Ed.Alin Olteanu Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Springer. [13]马西莫·里奥尼:“高保真、低保真、无保真与无线保真阐释---与张江教授关于文本意图问题的讨论”, 权达译, 《社会科学战线》6 (2017) :151-59。 [14][Leone, Massimo.“Hi-fi, Lo-fi, No-fi, and Wi-fi Interpretation”, Social Sciences Front 6 (2017) :151-59.] [15]Lotman, Iurij Michajlovich.The Structure of the Artistic Text.Trans.Ronald Vroon.Ann Arbor, MI:Dept.of Slavic Languages and Literature, University of Michigan, 1977. [16]---.The Semiotic of Russian Culture.Ed.Ann Shukman.Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan, 1984. [17]---.Universe of the Mind.Trans.Anne Shukman;foreword by Umberto Eco.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press, 1990. [18]Lotman, Iurij Michajlovich, Lidiia Ia.Ginsburg, and Boris A.Uspenskii, eds.The Semiotics of Russian Cultural History.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press, 1985. [19]Mandelbrot, Beno5t B.Les objets fractals:forme, hasard et dimension.Paris:Flammarion, 1975. [20]---.Fractals:Form, Chance and Dimension.San Francisco, CA:W.H.Freeman, 1977. [21]Mead, Margaret.“Vicissitudes of the Study of the Total Communication Process”.Approaches to Semiotics:Cultural Anthropology, Educations, Linguistics, Psychiatry, Psychology;Transactions of the Indiana University Conference on Paralinguistics and Kinesics.Eds.Thomas A.Sebeok, Alfred S.Hayes, and Mary Catherine Bateson.The Hague:Mouton, 1964.277-87. [22]Petitot-Cocorda, Jean.Physique du sens:de la théorie des singularités aux structures sémio-narratives.Paris:Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1992. [23]Rastier, Fran9ois.La mesure et le grain:sémantique de corpus.Paris:H.Champion, 2011. [24]Saussure, Ferdinand de.Cours de linguistique générale, critical edition by Tullio de Mauro.Paris:Payot, 1972. [25]Thom, René.Esquisse d'une sémiophysique.Paris:Inter Editions, 1988. [26]---.Semio Physics:A Sketch.Trans.Vendla Meyer.Calif.Redwood City:Addison-Wesley Pub.Co., Advanced Book Program, 1990.

符号域中的对称：一个类型学研究

Symmetries in the Semiosphere: A Typology

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李庆本. 比较文学的中国范式 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(2): 13-23.
[2]	郭超, 耿希文. 概念的双重迷宫：元宇宙及其框架内的游戏研究 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(1): 12-20.
[3]	张自春. 组织、个属与文化区块：解放区的文化机理与“赵树理方向”的生发 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(1): 126-136.
[4]	李凤亮, 周梦琛. 数字文化产业视野下的传统文化创新 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 12-19.
[5]	王宁. 雷蒙德·威廉斯之于当今文学和文化研究的意义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 20-29.
[6]	倪爱珍. 陶瓷的物性与图像叙事 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 194-202.
[7]	于成. 浮士德的三次试验与基特勒论话语系统1800的诞生 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 82-90.
[8]	周启星. 从文化研究到文学研究：离散理论的演进、转向及问题 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 91-102.
[9]	赵禹平. 指示与元叙述：真人真事改编电影的双层叙述 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 112-121.
[10]	勾彦殳. 虚拟异托邦：论当代大众文化的受众快感机制及其接受效果 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(4): 43-51.
[11]	吴炫, 蔡甜甜, 闫淑. 中华生命力美学的问题之思 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 11-20.
[12]	杜心源. “本土”实践与话语规划——对20世纪90年代外国文学研究论争的再探讨 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 90-99.
[13]	冯伟. 从符号学到现象学：欧美剧场表演研究基本方法的确立 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 128-137.
[14]	石可. 论剧场性 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 139-151.
[15]	马大康, 王正中. 符号结构与感觉重构 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(2): 1-13.