从动物视角看“物化”中的道家情感论

文艺理论研究

• 中国特色文论话语体系研究：中外文论比较研究 • 上一篇下一篇

从动物视角看“物化”中的道家情感论

胡素情

湖南大学外国语学院

出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-10-19
作者简介:胡素情，文学博士，湖南大学外国语学院副教授，主要从事英美文学、比较文学研究。
基金资助:
国家社科基金项目“18—19世纪英国文学中的‘动物同情书写’研究”[项目编号：13CWW036]的阶段性成果

The Affect Theory of Tao with "Wuhua" from an Animal Perspective

Hu Suqin

the School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University

Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-10-19
About author:Hu Suqing, Ph.D., is an associate professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University. Her research interests cover American and British literature and comparative literature.
Supported by:
the research program "Sympathy toward Animals in the 18-19th Century British Literature" [13CWW036], funded by the National Social Sciences Fund of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以动物为切入视角，从情状、身体和语言三方面探究“物化”中的动物书写及道家情感论。论文先从“物化”中确凿的物种间情感现象出发，在德勒兹等人的“生成-动物”和“情状”概念启示下探究“物化”中人与动物相互转化的哲学张力及情感动力，并以战国末期的气化宇宙论及“气情”说证明“物化”确实潜藏着人类-动物间的情感关联。其次，“物化”具有人向动物“生成”的具身性和操演性，交接之“气”则在人、物交接中形成了类似于情的空间氛围。从语言上看，“物化”体现了《庄子》以动物为媒介往返于语言分裂地带，从逻辑向诗性的感性言说，是人向自然转化的书写实践。概言之，动物为我们探究先秦道家情感论的生发及其自然走向提供了独特的观察视角；“物化”并非原始思维的活物论，而是《庄子》对理性思维的反拨，对个人情感的正视及其自然化处理的解决之道。

关键词: 《庄子》, 情状, 物化, 生成-动物, 气

Abstract: This article explores the affective, bodily and linguistic aspects of Tao's lyricism in the pre-Qin period from the perspective of human-animal relationship. Based on the human-animal affective bonds in wuhua, this article first proposes that the animal effects emotional changes in human beings in the light of Deleuze and Guattari's "becoming-animal" and the affect theory, which can also be firmly demonstrated by the "qi" and "qi-qing" cosmology in the Pre-Qin period. Then it argues that the human-animal bond of "wuhua" is embodied and performative, thus forming affective auras between the bodies. Viewed linguistically, the special position of the animal at the split boundary between language and pre-language can be used creatively to fight against meticulous and precise symbolization of language, and in doing so, Chuang Tzu is performing the becoming of animals himself through writing. In sum, the animal can help us to observe, in a unique way, how the incipient lyricism is formed and its interconnectedness with nature in the Pre-Qin period, and "wuhua" is not at all naive anthropomorphism, but an opposition to rational epistemology, a solution to personal emotional problems with the help of nature.

Key words: Zhuangzi, affect, wuhua, becoming-animal, qi

胡素情. 从动物视角看“物化”中的道家情感论[J]. 文艺理论研究.

Hu Suqin . The Affect Theory of Tao with "Wuhua" from an Animal Perspective[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art.

[1]Agamben, Giorgio.Infancy and History.Trans.Liz Heron.London:Verso, 2007. [2]Allinson, Robert E..“On Chuang Tzu as a Deconstructionist with a Difference.”Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.3&4 (2003) :487-500. [3]毕来德:《庄子四讲》, 宋刚译。北京:中华书局, 2009年。[Billeter, Jean Francois.Four Readings about Zhuangzi.Trans.Song Gang.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 2009.] [4]---:“庄子九札”, 《中国文哲研究通讯》第22卷第3期“毕来德与跨文化事业中的庄子研究专辑” (上) , (2012) :1-36。[---.“Nine Chapters of Zhuangzi.”Chinese Literary and Philosophical Communication 22.3 (2012) :1-36.] [5]Burkitt, Ian.Bodies of Thought:Embodiment, Identity and Modernity.London:SAGE, 1999.陈鼓应:“论道与物关系问题:中国哲学史上的一条主线”, 《台大文史哲学报》8 (2005) :33-37。 [6][Chen, Guying.“The Relationship between Tao and Things.”Literature, History and Philosophy Journal of Taipei University 8 (2005) :33-37.]陈世骧:“中国的抒情传统”, 《陈世骧文存》。台北:志文出版社, 1972年。 [7][Chen, Shih-hsiang.“Lyrical Tradition of China.”Works of Chen Shih-hsiang.Taipei:Zhiwen Press, 1972.] [8]Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari.A Thousand Plateaus.Trans.Brian Massumi.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1987. [9][---.Kafka:Toward a Minor Literature.Trans.Dana Polan.Mineapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1986. [10]Derrida, Jacques.The Animal That Therefore I Am.New York:Fordham University Press, 2008. [11]Graham, A.C..Chuang Tzu:The Inner Chapters.London:Unwin Paperbacks, 1986. [12]郭庆藩:《庄子集释》。北京:中华书局, 2006年。[Guo, Qingfan.Chuang-tzu and Its Comments.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 2006.] [13]Kristeva, Julia.Powers of Horror.Trans.Leon S.Roudiez.New York:Columbia University Press, 1982.赖锡三:“神话·变形·冥契·隐喻---老庄的肉身之道与隐喻之道”, 《台大中文学报》33 (2010) :1-44。 [14][Lai, Xisan.“Myth, Transformation, Mysticism and Metaphor:Body and Metaphor of Laozi and Zhuangzi.”Chinese Journal of Taipei University 33 (2010) :1-44.]---:“《庄子》身体观的三维辩证”, 《清华学报》42.1 (2013) :1-43。 [15][---.“Three Dimensional Dialectical View of the Body.”Journal of Tsing Hua University 42.1 (2013) :1-43.] [16]---:“气化流行与人文化成”, 《文与哲》22 (2013) :39-96。[---.“Flowing of Qi and Forming of Humanity.”Literature and Philosophy 22 (2013) :39-96.] [17]Skogemann, P..“Chuang Tzu and the Butterfly Dream.”Journal of Analytical Psychology 31 (1986) :75-90. [18]Sterckx, Roel.The Animal and the Daemon in Early China.Albany:SUNY Press, 2002. [19]Tuan, Yi-fu.Space and Place:the Perspective of Experience.Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press, 2003. [20]王冲:《论衡校释》, 黄晖编。北京:中华书局, 1990。[Wang, Chong.The Book of Lunheng with Comments and Annotations.Ed.Huang Hui.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 1990.] [21]Wu, Kuang-Ming.On Chinese Body Thinking.Leiden:Brill, 1997. [22]杨儒宾:“支离与践行---论先秦思想里的两种身体观”, 《中国古代思想中的气论及身体观》, 杨儒宾主编。台北:巨流图书公司, 1993年, 415-50。[Yang, Rubin.“Broken and Performing:Two Views of Body in Pre-Qin Thoughts.”Qi and Body in Ancient Chinese Thoughts.Ed.Yang Rubin.Taipei:Juliu Book Company, 1993.415-50.]

从动物视角看“物化”中的道家情感论

The Affect Theory of Tao with "Wuhua" from an Animal Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	岳进. 早期辞赋中的身体治疾与山水观想研究——以《七发》为中心 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(2): 151-161.
[2]	彭英龙. 气韵与移情——中日现代美学史的一个议题 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 31-38.
[3]	潘务正. 桐城派“诗文一理”论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(5): 107-119.
[4]	朱泽宝. 论魏禧“真气”说的理论内涵及其文论意义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(5): 109-117.
[5]	约瑟夫·格雷戈里·马奥尼. 文化产业与大众欺骗：批判视角下的当代中国软实力 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(1): 146-155.
[6]	王行坤 . “后人类/人本”转向下的人类、动物与生命——从阿甘本到青年马克思 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(3): 36-47.
[7]	彭锋. 气韵与节奏 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(6): 16-25.
[8]	刘书刚. 庄子“卮言”与其“言”之观念论析 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(1): 89-95.
[9]	隋红升. 男性气概与男性气质：男性研究中的两个易混概念辨析 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(2): 61-69.
[10]	胡欣, 严明. 论《诗薮》对《日本诗史》的影响 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 35(2): 32-40.
[11]	李波. 清代《庄子》散文评点的理论特质及其艺术价值 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(6): 130-138.
[12]	熊湘 . 古代文论范畴“气”与“脉”之关系探赜 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(4): 143-149.
[13]	毛海莹. 女性气质的民俗—原型批评论——以现代文学江南女性形象为批评范例 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2012, 32(5): 132-138.