欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 29-38.

• 专题：比较诗学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“文学自主”与“文学本位”：厄尔·迈纳跨文化比较诗学方法论刍议

纪建勋, 张建锋   

  1. 上海师范大学比较文学研究中心；上海师范大学
  • 出版日期:2018-01-25 发布日期:2018-10-19
  • 作者简介:纪建勋，上海师范大学比较文学研究中心副教授，哲学博士，主要从事比较文学原理、中外文学文化关系研究。 张建锋，上海师范大学文艺学博士生，主要从事比较诗学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    上海师范大学都市文化研究中心的支持；上海高校高峰学科建设计划资助“中国语言文学”；国家社科基金一般项目[项目编号：14BZJ001]；上海市浦江人才计划资助[项目编号：17PJC080]阶段性成果

The Autonomy of Literature and Literary Standards: A Study of Earl Miner's Methodology of Comparative Poetics

Ji Jianxun, Zhang Jianfeng   

  1. the Research Center of Comparative Literature and World Literature, Shanghai Normal University the School of Humanities and Communications, Shanghai Normal University
  • Online:2018-01-25 Published:2018-10-19
  • About author:Ji Jianxun, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Research Center of Comparative Literature and World Literature, Shanghai Normal University. His recent research interests focus on the theoretical and teaching aspects of Chinese comparative literature, and the relationship between Christian culture and Chinese literature. Zhang Jianfeng is a Ph.D. Candidate at the School of Humanities and Communications, Shanghai Normal University. His research interest focuses on comparative poetics.
  • Supported by:
    the Center for Urban Cultural Studies atShanghai Normal University, the Peak Disciplines of Universities in Shanghai Construction Program Funding for "ChineseLanguage and Literature", the Key Project of Social Sciences Foundation of China (14BZJ001), and the Pujiang ExcellentResearcher Awand Program from Shanghai Govermment (17PJC080)

PDF (PC)

97

摘要： 作为跨文化比较诗学奠基人的厄尔·迈纳对国际比较文学发展所做出的贡献在学界已有定论。厄尔·迈纳的比较诗学研究以对“文学自主性”的深刻体察为前提假定，并始终持守着鲜明的“文学本位”的基本立场。以此为根基，厄尔·迈纳细致地清理了东西方的“文学”与“诗学”传统，重新规定了比较视域下“文学”及“文类”的本质，并透辟地阐明了东西诗学差异性背后深刻的文化与历史成因。可以说，对“文学自主性”前提假定的深刻体察以及对“文学本位”基本立场的始终持守，成为解读厄尔·迈纳比较诗学体系的锁钥。但此进路长期以来未收到学界足够的重视，鉴于其在厄尔·迈纳比较诗学体系中的通贯性地位及其对当下比较诗学研究乃至跨文化研究的启迪意义，本文尝试结合厄尔·迈纳的早期论著对其跨文化比较诗学方法论予以进一步发掘与阐释。

关键词: 厄尔·迈纳, 文学自主性, 文学本位, 跨文化比较诗学, 比较文学

Abstract: The autonomy of literature and literary standard is of great significance for Earl Miner's comparative poetics research. The former is the presupposition of Earl Miner's system of comparative poetics, and the latter its basic standard. Departing from these, Miner draws a map for the literary and poetic tradition of the West and the East, thereby redefining the essence of literature and literary genres from a comparative perspective and expounding the cultural and historical factors that have led to the difference. Key to his system, Earl Miner's assumption of literature autonomy and abidance to the literary standard in literary studies are beneficial to current studies of literature, comparative literature, and comparative poetics.

Key words: Earl Miner, autonomy of literature, literary standard, intercultural comparative poetics, comparative literature