欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 133-141.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论三百年李渔评价中的“两极对立”

钟明奇   

  1. 杭州师范大学人文学院
  • 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2017-09-29
  • 作者简介:钟明奇，杭州师范大学人文学院教授，文学博士，主要从事明清文学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为杭州市哲学社会科学重点研究基地杭州师范大学中国古代文学与传统文化研究中心项目成果。

The Polar Opposites in the Criticism of Li Yu over Three Centuries

Zhong Mingqi   

  1. the Department of Humanities at Hangzhou Normal University
  • Online:2016-07-25 Published:2017-09-29
  • About author:Zhong Mingqi, Ph.D., is a professor at the Department of Humanities at Hangzhou Normal University. His research interest is literature in the Ming and Qing dynasties.
  • Supported by:

PDF (PC)

154

摘要： 李渔生前与殁后至今历史悠久的评价中不时出现“两极对立”，曰三百年，是取其成数。此种情形的发生，首先是因为李渔之人格极为复杂，有着多维度的“两极对立”；其次，这也与批评者的批评方式、批评心态存在诸多可议之处密切相关。我们惟有摈弃偏狭与情绪化的学术研究心理，坚持历史评价第一、道德评价第二的人物评价标准，并用发展的眼光、整体的视野去统摄李渔的人格，切实把握其人格发展的主导倾向，同时恰当区分、综合观照李渔的为人、思想与创作，既不因人废言，也不盲目地“因言誉人”，才能避免评价中的“两极对立”，将李渔研究推向一个新的高度。

关键词: 李渔, “两极对立” , 批评方式, 批评心态, 评价原则

Abstract: Since his lifetime, Li Yu has been receiving both positive and negative critical judgements. The primary reason for this was Li Yu's extremely complicated personality that had multi-layered polar opposites. It was also closely related to critical approaches and attitude. To avoid polar opposites in the criticism of Li Yu, we should avoid bias and emotional judgements, and adhere to the principle of prioritizing historical examination over moral evaluation. We should also comprehensively examine Li Yu's profile in the light of the development of his personality. It is necessary to distinguish and investigate Li Yu's behavior, thoughts and writing in an unbiased way, without too much praise for his works or attack on his personal life, so as to push forward the study of Li Yu.  

Key words: Li Yu, polar opposit, critical approach, critical mentality, evaluation principle