欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 198-207.

• 专题:法国理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

法与文学的“禁忌之恋”——在德里达《在法的前面》的前面

胡行舟   

  • 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 作者简介:胡行舟,厦门大学中国语言文学系助理教授,主要从事中国当代文学与后人类主义理论研究。

The “Tabooed Love” between Law and Literature: Before Derrida's Before the Law

Hu Xingzhou   

  • Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-06-12
  • About author:Hu Xingzhou, is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Xiamen University. His research interests cover contemporary Chinese literature and posthumanism theory.

摘要: 本文对德里达的《前判:在法的前面》进行系统梳理和阐发。德里达的论题叠合了两个面向:一是法的文学,二是文学的法。“法的文学”指向法的叙述性和虚构性,法自身没有本质,它最中心的系谱历史不可讲述,可也正是它本源的空缺导致了叙述在延迟中的差异化重复。“文学的法”则指向文学的建制和惯例,一个文本一旦开始书写,就已经在彰显法的作用并完成“合法的”表述行为,文学的阅读和流通也在法中。引入《类型的法则》,会让我们进一步窥见法与文学的互相支配和生产,它更带来了文学和法的关系的性别化和性爱化。本文首先着眼于德里达讨论的两个面向,刻画出法与文学“禁忌之恋”的基本样貌。本文继而从中抽绎出德里达着重论述的独异性问题,并再结合《法的力量:权威的“神秘基础”》一文阐明法的普泛性与个体存在的独异性之间的裂痕以及由此而来的正义的不可能性,并探问文学的独异性如何有可能为个体存在的独异性赋能,让法也伫立在文学的前面。

关键词: 德里达, 卡夫卡, 法, 文学, 独异性

Abstract: This essay elucidates Derrida's Before the Law: The Complete Text of Préjugés. Derrida's thesis is twofold: law qua literature and literature qua law. Law qua literature points to law's narrativity and fictionality. Law possesses no essence; the genealogical history at its core is utterable. However, it is precisely this absence of origin that triggers off the deferred narration marked by repetition of difference. Literature qua law refers to the institution and convention of literature. Once a text is being written, it exhibits functions of the law and accomplishes “legitimate” expressive acts, wherein the reading and circulation of literature also take place. Bringing in Derrida's interpretation of Maurice Blanchot in the “Law of Genre” and its intertextuality with his reading of Kafka, we can further explore the mutual production and domination between law and literature, as well as sexualize their correlation. This essay first examines the two folds in Derrida's reasoning, drawing an outline of the “tabooed” love. It then explores the issue of singularity that Derrida accentuates with the help of his “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation’ of Authority,” illustrating the break between the generality of law and the singularity of a subject's being as well as the impossibility of full justice. This essay enquires how the singularity of literature may enable the singular being of a subject, and thereby tempt law into a game of love to make it stand before literature.

Key words: Derrida, Kafka, law, literature, singularity