生机论美学:从德勒兹到朗西埃

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 德勒兹和朗西埃的再现批判项目在生机论脉络上重新定义艺术自律,反思流行的艺术自律论与再现的勾连,用生命诗学取代有机诗学。德勒兹引入生命和生成的观念,认为自律的作品就是纯粹感觉的团块,文艺创造把潜在从现实中解放出来并假定其有效性,由此带来全新的叙事方式。朗西埃延续了德勒兹生机论的思考,但质疑德勒兹以文学形而上学来反对再现诗学的进路,在美学体制内将艺术作品的自律移转为生命形式的自律,指出现代小说结构是不同感觉团块叠加碰撞的异识体,现代主义生命诗学是感性共存的矛盾诗学。

关键词: 艺术自律, 再现/反再现, 纯粹感觉, 美学体制, 异识体

Abstract: Deleuze and Rancière's project of representational criticism redefines artistic autonomy in the context of vitalism, reflecting on the connection between popular artistic autonomy and representation, and replacing organic poetics with life poetics. Deleuze introduces the concepts of “Life” and “becoming,” arguing that works of autonomy are blocs of pure sensation. Literary creation liberates the virtual from its actualizations and assumes a validity of its own, leading to a fundamentally new type of narration. Rancière builds upon Deleuze's thoughts on vitalism, but questions Deleuze's approach of proposing a metaphysics of literature against representational poetics and transferring the self-regulation of works of art to self-regulation of life within the aesthetic regime. He points out that the structure of modern novel is a dissensual figure that superimposes different blocs of sensations, and the modernist poetics of life is a contradictory poetics where in sensations coexist.

Key words: autonomy of art, representation/anti-representation, pure sensation, aesthetic regime of art, dissensual figure

郑海婷. 生机论美学:从德勒兹到朗西埃[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(6): 183-192.

Zheng Haiting. Vitalistic Aesthetics: From Deleuze to Rancière[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2023, 43(6): 183-192.

梅耶·霍华德·艾布拉姆斯:《镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统》,郦稚牛等译。北京:北京大学出版社,1989年。
[Abrams, M.H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Trans. Li Zhiniu, et al. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1989.]
Colebrook, Claire. Gilles Deleuze. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
———. Essays Critical and Clinical. Trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. London and New York: Verso, 1998.
———. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Trans. Daniel W. Smith. London and New York: Continuum, 2003.
———. Negotiations: 1972-1990. Trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
———. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Mark Lester, with Charles Stivale. Ed. Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Volume 1, Anti-Oedipus. Trans. Robert Hurley, et al. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
———. Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Volume 2, A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
———. What Is Philosophy? Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
尤金·W.霍兰德:《导读德勒兹与加塔利〈千高原〉》,周兮吟译。重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016年。
[Holland, Eugene W. Deleuze and Guattari's ‘A Thousand Plateaus’: A Reader's Guide. Trans. Zhou Xiyin. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2016.]
黄建宏:《无人称的政治性》,《文化研究月报》,2004年10月15日,2022年12月20日,〈http://hermes. hrc.ntu.edu.tw/csa/journal/43/journal_park338.htm〉。
[Huang, Jianhong. “The Politicalness of the Impersonal.” Cultural Studies Monthly. 15 October 2004.20 December 2022. 〈http://hermes.hrc.ntu.edu.tw/csa/journal/43/journal_park338.htm〉.]
Nabais, Catarina Pombo. Deleuze's Literary Theory: The Laboratory of His Philosophy. Trans. Ronald Bogue. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
Parr, Adrian, ed. The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005.
Rancière, Jacques. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Trans. Seven Corcoran. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
———. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Ed. and trans. Steven Corcoran. London and New York: Continuum, 2010.
———. “From Politics to Aesthetics?” Paragraph 28.1(2005):13-25.
———. “Is There a Deleuzian Aesthetics?” Trans. Radmila Djordjevic. Qui Parle 14.2(2004):1-14.
———. Modern Times: Temporality in Art and Politics. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London and New York: Verso, 2022.
———. Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Trans. James Swenson. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
———. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London and New York: Verso, 2009.
———. The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
———. The Lost Thread: The Democracy of Modern Fiction. Trans. Steven Corcoran. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.
———. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Trans. Gabriel Rockhill. London and New York: Continuum, 2004.
———. “The Sublime from Lyotard to Schiller: Two Readings of Kant and Their Political Significance.” Trans. Max Blechman. Radical Philosophy 126(2004):8-15.
———. “The Thread of the Novel.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 47.2(2014):196-209.
Rancière, Jacques:《德勒兹,巴特比与文学格式》,黄建宏译,《中外文学》28.3(1999):4—28。
[Rancière, Jacques. “Deleuze, Bartleby, and the Literary Formula.” Trans. Huang Jianhong. Chung Wai Literary Quarterly 28.3(1999):4-28. ]
Rockhill, Gabriel. “The Silent Revolution.” SubStance 33.1(2004):54-76.
丹尼尔·W. 史密斯:《批评,临床》,《德勒兹:关键概念(原书第2版)》,查尔斯·J.斯蒂瓦尔编,田延译。重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018年。289—304。
[Smith, Daniel W. “Critical, Clinical.” Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts 2e. Ed. Charles J. Stivale. Trans. Tian Yan. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2018.289-304.]
杨凯麟:《分裂分析德勒兹:先验经验论与建构主义》。郑州:河南大学出版社,2017年。
[Yang, Kailin. Schizo-Analysis of Gilles Deleuze: Transcen-dental Empiricism and Constructivism. Zhengzhou: Henan University Press, 2017. ]

[1]	常培杰. 阿多诺对先锋艺术“自发性”的批判 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(4): 55-69.
[2]	郑海婷. 艺术的美学体制及其政治维度的构建——雅克·朗西埃美学思想考察 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 182-186.
[3]	徐岱. 艺术自律与审美正义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(3): 181-194.

生机论美学:从德勒兹到朗西埃

Vitalistic Aesthetics: From Deleuze to Rancière

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价