欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 192-203.

• 青年论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

羞耻、酷儿理论与情感转向：以美国学界为中心的考察 

杨玲   

  1. 厦门大学中文系
  • 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-16
  • 作者简介:杨玲，文学博士，厦门大学中文系副教授，主要从事文学理论与文化研究。

Shame, Queer Theory, and the Affective Turn: A Study Centering on the Scholarship in the United States

Yang Ling   

  1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Xiamen University
  • Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-16
  • About author:Yang Ling, Ph.D., is an associate professor at the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Xiamen University. Her research interests include literary theory and cultural studies.

PDF (PC)

1073

摘要： 羞耻是酷儿群体中常见的负面情感，也是塞吉维克从酷儿研究转向情感理论的关键线索。通过对汤姆金斯著作的发掘和整理，塞吉维克将羞耻重新阐释为与身份塑造相关的、具有政治潜能的生产性情感。羞耻随后引起美国酷儿学者的广泛关注，并因此汇聚出一条情感理论的酷儿支脉。羞耻概念不仅有助于我们重新思考酷儿政治、伦理、历史和美学，羞耻与性别、性态、失能、种族等范畴的交叉也为社会和政治分析提供了新的概念工具。随着英语学界的研究焦点从酷儿羞耻拓展到性别羞耻，对羞耻的探讨或将成为情感转向中最富活力的领域之一。

关键词: 羞耻, 酷儿理论, 情感转向, 情感理论, 塞吉维克

Abstract: Starting with Eve Sedgwick's shame theory, this paper examines queer theory scholars' explorations into shame in the United States and their continuing dialogue on the political potential of this particular form of affect. The paper argues that the theorization of shame has left a distinct mark on affect theory. The notion of shame has provided impetus for reflecting on queer politics, ethics, historiography and aesthetics, and its intersections with categories such as gender, sexuality, disability and race also offer new points of depature for social and political analyses.

Key words: shame, queer theory, the affective turn, affect theory, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick