“未可言说之美”:评《美与崇高:文艺认知美学》——兼与帕特里克·霍根教授商榷

于雷

文艺理论研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 171-178.

PDF(1130 KB)
欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》, 2025年7月28日 星期一
PDF(1130 KB)
文艺理论研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 171-178.
西方文论与美学研究

“未可言说之美”:评《美与崇高:文艺认知美学》——兼与帕特里克·霍根教授商榷

作者信息 +

"The Unspoken Beauty": A Review of Beauty and Sublimity: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

美国康涅狄格大学文学认知研究专家霍根教授再推力作《美与崇高:文艺认知美学》(1);该书尤其旨在为文学中诸多纷繁的个体审美反应探求一种结构性主张,同时借助与认知科学的对话,使得文学美学研究中那向来“未可言说”的部分获得空前的认知审美观照。本文拟聚焦于“信息加工”与“情感机制”、“审美共性”与“个性品味”以及“变奏”“经典化”与“审美争议”等三大关键节点,在对它们加以厘清的同时,凸出围绕文学认知研究路径中出现的相关问题加以商榷。

Abstract

Patrick Colm Hogan's newly published monograph Beauty and Sublimity: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts aims to explore, among others, the architectural substratum underlying miscellaneous aesthetic responses in literature and the arts, and, by having recourse to a dialogue with cognitive science, enables the previously "unspoken beauty" to secure an unprecedented cognitive attention. This review, on the one hand, focuses and elaborates upon such three crucial topoi as "information processing & emotion system," "aesthetic universals & the diversity of taste," and "variation, canonization & aesthetic argument," as illustrated in Hogan's work, and, on the other, takes issue with a few research trajectories arising in the present literary cognition studies.

关键词

帕特里克·霍根
/ 《美与崇高》 / 美学 / 文学认知

Key words

Patrick Colm Hogan / Beauty and Sublimity / aesthetics / literary cognition

引用本文

导出引用
于雷. “未可言说之美”:评《美与崇高:文艺认知美学》——兼与帕特里克·霍根教授商榷[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(4): 171-178
Yu Lei. "The Unspoken Beauty": A Review of Beauty and Sublimity: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2018, 38(4): 171-178
中图分类号:     

参考文献

 [1]Crane, Mary Thomas.“Surface, Depth, and the Spatial Imaginary:A Cognitive Reading of The Political Unconscious.”Representations 108.1 (2009) :76-97.

[2]Dimock, Wai Chee.“Cognition as a Category of Literary Analysis.”American Literature 67.4 (1995) :825-31.

[3]Hogan, Patrick Colm.Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts.New York:Routledge, 2003.

[4]---.The Mind and Its Stories:Narrative Universals and Human Emotion.Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 2003.

[5]---.What Literature Teaches Us About Emotion.Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 2011.

[6]---.How Author's Minds Make Stories.Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 2013.

[7]---.Beauty and Sublimity:A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts.Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 2016.

[8]胡俊:“艺术·人脑·审美---当代西方神经美学的研究进展、意义和愿景”, 《文艺理论研究》4 (2015) :164-72。

[9][Hu, Jun.“Art, Brain and Aesthetics:On the Development, Significance and Vision of Contemporary Western Neuroaesthetics.”Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 4 (2015) :164-172.]

[10]Ingarden, Roman.Cognition of the Literary Work of Art.Trans.Ruth Ann Crowley and Kenneth R.Olson.Evanston:Northwestern UP.1973.

[11]Jaen, Isabel, and Julien Jacques Simon, eds.Cognitive Literary Studies:Current Themes and New Directions.Austin:University of Texas Press, 2012.

[12]Kramnick, Jonathan.“Against Literary Darwinism.”Critical Inquiry 37.2 (2011) :315-47.

[13]C.S.路易斯:《文艺评论的实验》, 徐文晓译。上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2007年。

[14][Lewis, C.S..An Experiment in Criticism.Trans.Xu Wenxiao.Shanghai:East China Normal UP, 2007.]

[15]Poe, Edgar Allan.Eureka.Eds.Stuart Levine and Susan F.Levine.Urbana and Chicago:University of Illinois Press, 2004.

[16]Shakespeare, William.The Complete Works of William Shakespeare.New York:Gramercy Books, 1975.

[17]Tsur, Reuven.Toward A Theory of Cognitive Poetics.Amsterdam:North-Holland, 1992.

基金

国家社科基金一般项目“爱伦·坡小说寓意发生的逻辑界面研究”[项目编号:13BWW037]的阶段性成果

PDF(1130 KB)

796

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/