本文力图论证文学作为艺术的一个门类,着重阐明文学作为艺术即文学性的三种方式:形式主义方式,本体论方式和程序论方式。形式主义强调文学性存在于具有某种特征的语言和叙事之中,比如陌生化的语言。本体论强调文学性存在于某种特定的存在之中,比如纯意向性对象。程序论强调文学性存在于适当的阅读态度之中,这种态度是长期的文学教育的结果。
Abstract
This paper argues that literature is an art form and proposes three ways to approach the issue. The issue is then rephrased as three views of literariness: the formalist, the ontological and the procedural. The formalist view claims that the literariness exists in special linguistic and narrative features, such as defamiliarization. The ontological view emphasizes on a certain form of existence of the text and takes a literary work as a pure intentional object. The procedural view asserts that literariness exists in the appropriate attitude of reading as a result of long-term literature education.
关键词
文学性 /
形式主义 /
艺术作品本体论 /
程序定义
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
literariness /
formalism /
ontology of art works /
procedural definition
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
Altieri, Charles. “A Procedural Definition of Literature.” What is Literature? Ed. Paul Hennadi. Bloomington: Indiana UP., 1978.
Carroll, Noel. On Criticism. New York and London: Routledge, 2009.
Erlich, Victor. “Russian Formalism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 34.4 (1973): 627-38.
Fish, Stanley. Is there a Text in this Class? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP., 1980.
Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art. Trans. George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973.
庞朴:《一分为三:中国传统思想考释》。深圳:海天出版社,1995年。
[Pang, Pu. Trichotomy: Textual Criticism and Interpretation. Shenzhen: Haitian Publishing House, 1995.]
Thomasson, Annie. “The Ontology of Art.” The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Ed. Peter Kivy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. 78-92.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}