本文对学界近百年来关于宋元戏曲本体与生成的研究成果进行反思，指出宋元戏曲“是什么”？“如何演”？“何以如此演”？这既是王国维《宋元戏曲史》留下的“戏曲史难题”，亦是戏曲学界一直追问然至今在研究的逻辑起点上就陷入概念的模糊不清乃至误解的学术问题。究其原因有三：一是认为王国维的“戏曲”是指“剧本”“曲本”“文章”；二是套用西方戏剧理念统括中国的戏剧和戏曲，导致中国戏曲史研究中“戏剧”和“戏曲”不分，进而将“我国戏剧”的“形成”视为“我国戏曲”的“形成”，乃至演生出尴尬的“戏剧戏曲学”；三是前修时贤大体上沿着王国维“代言体”“必合言语、动作、歌唱，以演一故事”的致思去探讨宋元南戏北剧的形成，然诸贤均将戏曲视为由多种元素构成的综合性艺术成品，集中于戏曲诸种元素如何“合”的剖析，而不是将戏曲视为“活”在剧场的无“墙”之戏来探究。学界以往恰恰是运用文献考据的、静态的、适合平面研究的方法去研究鲜活的、动态的、立体的、“存在”于剧场的戏曲。这正是近百年来戏曲研究所面临的学术困境。本文认为，应将宋元戏曲“还原”于剧场展开“存在”之思：紧紧围绕戏曲演述者“如何演”这一核心，探究剧作家、演员、行当、剧中人、观众之间“视界”交融与“文本”会通以及共生的关系，解读各种“文本”的语义、功能及其言说方式，在“剧场交流语境”中领悟和揭示“谁正在演”“戏曲如何演”“戏曲何以如此演”。
Abstract
This paper is a reflective study of the researches on Song-Yuan drama's essence and existence done in the past century. It tries to define what Song-Yuan drama really is, and demonstrate how it is put on the stage and why it is staged in such a certain way. These issues have been tackled in Wang Guowei's Song-Yuan Drama History but have not been clarified since, so they have met with much misinterpretation. Three types of reasons lie behind the misinterpretation, and this has become the conundrum in the study of Chinese opera history. The first type proposes that Wang defined Chinese Song-Yuan opera as drama, song text, or writing. The second, which adopts Western theater theory to explain Chinese opera, does not distinguish between drama and opera, and therefore the genesis of Chinese drama and that of Chinese opera are indiscriminately studied. The third type of scholars usually share a view of speech-impersonation with Wang Guo-wei who claimed that Chinese opera should perform in such a way as to integrate speech, action, and singing into the story-telling. These scholars usually take Chinese opera as a composite art form instead of taking it as an art alive in the theatre. Scholar are accustomed to textual, static and planar approaches instead of dynamic and multi-dimensional ones. The paper proposes that the study of Chinese opera should return to the site of performance in order to investigate its nature of existence, focusing on "how to perform," and with this focus the study can then examine the confluence of horizons and symbiosis between dramatists, actors, characters, roles, and audience, and the analysis of the meaning, function and discursive modes of dramatic text can be possible, while the who, how and why in the performance can be revealed in the context of theatric communication.
关键词
“戏曲史难题” /
本体与生成 /
反思 /
剧场交流语境理论
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
conundrum of Chinese opera history /
essence and existence /
reflective study /
context of theatric communication
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
布莱希特《布莱希特论戏剧》，丁扬忠等译，北京：中国戏剧出版社1990年版。
[Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on drama. Trans. Ding Yangzhong, et al. Beijing: China Theater Press,1990.]
陈友峰《生命之约：中国戏曲本体新论》，北京：文化艺术出版社2008年版。
[Chen, Youfeng. The Invitation of Life: A New Discourse on the Essence of Chinse Opera. Beijing: Culture and Art Publishing House, 2008.]
胡忌《宋金杂剧考》，上海：古典文学出版社1957年版。
[Hu, Ji. An Investigative Study of Song-Jin Drama. Shanghai: Classical Literature Press, 1957.]
胡明伟《中国早期戏剧观念研究》，北京：学苑出版社2005年版。
[Hu, Weiming. A Study on Early Concept of Chinese Opera. Beijing: Academy Press, 2005.]
黄卉《元代戏曲史稿》，天津：天津古籍出版社1995年版。
[Huang, Hui. A History of Yuan Dram. Tianjin: Tianjin Classical Books Press, 1995.]
黄仕忠《中国戏曲史研究》，广州：中山大学出版社1997年版。
[Huang, Shizhong. A Study of the History of Chinese Drama. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press, 1997.]
李万钧主编《中国古今戏剧史》上卷，广州：广东高等教育出版社1997年版。
[Li, Wanjun. A History of Chinese Drama from the Ancient to the Modern. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 1997.]
《人间词话百年解评》，刘锋杰、章池集评，合肥：黄山书社2002年版。
[Liu, Fengjie and Zhang Chi. Interpretative Annotations to Commentaries on Ci Poetry. Hefei: Huangshan Books, 2002.]
刘晓明《杂剧形成史》，北京：中华书局2007年版。
[Liu, Xiaoming. A History of the Development of Zaju Drama. Beijing: Zhonghua Books, 2007.]
马美信《宋元戏曲史疏证》，上海：复旦大学出版社2004年版。
[Ma, Meixin. Critical Investigations into Song-Yuan Drama History. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2004.]
马也《戏剧人类学》，北京：文化艺术出版社1993年版。
[Ma, Ye. Drama Anthropology. Beijing: Culture and Art Publishing House, 1993.]
任半塘《唐戏弄》上册，上海：上海古籍出版社1984年版。
[Ren, Bantang. Drama of Tang Dynasty. Shanghai: Shanghai Classical Books Publishing House, 1984.]
王国维《宋元戏曲史》，上海：华东师范大学出版社1995年版。
[Wang, Guowei. Song-Yuan Drama History. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 1995.]
王国维《戏曲考源》，见《王国维遗书》第十册，上海：上海书店出版社1983年版。
[-----.“The Origin of Chinese Opera.” Wang Guowei Posthumous WorksVol.10. Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore, 1983.]
许金榜《中国戏曲文学史》，北京：中国文学出版社1994年版。
[Xu, Jinbang. A History of Chinese Dramatic Literature. Beijing: China Literature Press,1994.]
叶长海《宋元戏曲史导读》，上海：上海古籍出版社1998年版。
[Ye, Changhai. Introduction to Song-Yuan Drama History. Shanghai: Shanghai Classical Books Publishing House, 1998.]
曾永义《戏曲源流新论》（增订版），北京：中华书局2008年版。
[Zeng, Yongyi. A New Discourse on Chinese Opera’s Origins and Sources (revised edition). Beijing: Zhonghua Books, 2008.]
曾永义《中国古典戏剧的形成》，见李肖冰、黄天骥、袁鹤翔、夏写时等编《中国戏剧起源》，北京：知识出版社1990年。
[---. “The Formation of Chinese Classical Opera.” The Origin of Chinese Opera. Eds. Huang Tianji, Yuan Hexiang and Xia Xieshi. Beijing: Knowledge Publishing House, 1990.]
邹元江《中西戏剧审美陌生化思维研究》，北京：人民出版社2009年版。
[Zou, Yuanjiang. A Study on the Aesthetic Concept of Defamiliarization between Chinese and Western Drama. Beijing: People Publishing House, 2009.]
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(474 KB)
({{custom_author.role_cn}}), {{javascript:window.custom_author_cn_index++;}}
