“把中国的还给中国”——“隔与不隔”与“赋、比、兴”的一种对位阅读

文艺理论研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 57-66.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇下一篇

“把中国的还给中国”——“隔与不隔”与“赋、比、兴”的一种对位阅读

罗钢

清华大学人文学院

出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-05-01
作者简介:罗钢，清华大学人文学院教授，博士生导师，主要从事文学理论、比较诗学、中国现代文艺思想研究。

"Return What is China’s to China": A Contrapuntal Reading of "the Veiled and the Unveiled" and "Fu, Bi, Xing"

Luo Gang

the School of Humanities, Tsinghua University

Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-05-01
About author:Luo Gang is a professor at the School of Humanities, Tsinghua University (Beijing 100084). His research interests cover literary theory, comparative poetics, and modern Chinese literary thought.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 王国维的“隔与不隔”说源于叔本华对概念与直观的区分，源于近代西方美学感性与理性二元对立的思想传统，它与中国古代诗学“赋、比、兴”的批评范式是错位和矛盾的。正是这种错位和矛盾，使王国维把比、兴斥为隔。长期以来，我们不仅未能意识到王国维诗学内部存在的这种断裂，把“意境说”看作中西美学的某种融合，而且进一步用image等西方的诗学范畴来阐释和重构中国古代诗学，称之为对中国古代诗学的“现代阐释”，这种方式造成对传统诗学的某些最重要的精神和价值的遮蔽和压抑，应当进行认真的反思。

关键词: 隔与不隔, 赋、比、兴, 王国维, 现代阐释

Abstract: Wang Guowei's theory about the poetic states of being "veiled (ge) and unveiled (buge)" derives from Schopenhauer's distinction between concept and intuition as well as the traditional dualistic antithesis of rationality and emotion of modern Western aesthetics. This paper argues that Wang's theory is displaced from and contradicted with the critical paradigm of "Fu-Bi-Xing (straightforward narrative, explicit comparison, implicit comparison)" in Chinese ancient poetics. Due to this displacement and contradiction, Wang Guowei regards Bi and Xing as "the veiled". The rupture inherent in Wang Guowei's poetics has long been overlooked and his theory of "artistic conception" has been treated as a fusion of Chinese and Western aesthetics. Moreover, critics have utilized the Western poetic categories such as "image" to interpret and reconstruct Chinese ancient poetics, claiming that it is a "modern interpretation" of Chinese ancient poetics. This methodology overshadows and oppresses some of the most significant spirits and values in traditional poetics and thus requires some serious reflections on our part.

Key words: the veiled and the unveiled; Fu-Bi-Xing, Wang Guowei, modern interpretation

罗钢. “把中国的还给中国”——“隔与不隔”与“赋、比、兴”的一种对位阅读[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(2): 57-66.

Luo Gang. "Return What is China’s to China": A Contrapuntal Reading of "the Veiled and the Unveiled" and "Fu, Bi, Xing"[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(2): 57-66.

亚里士多德：《诗学》，罗念生译。北京：商务印书馆，1996年。
[Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. Luo Niansheng. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1996.]
丁福保：《历代诗话续编》。北京：中华书局，2001年。
[Ding, Fubao. A Sequel to Poetry Commentaries across the Dynasties. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2001.]
郭绍虞：《清诗话续编》。上海：上海古籍出版社，1999年。
[Guo, Shaoyu. A Sequel to Poetry Commentaries of the Qing Dynasty. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press, 1999.]
——：《中国历代文论选》。上海：上海古籍出版社，1979年。
[---. An Anthology of Chinese Literary Essays across the Dynasties. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press, 1979.]
罗宗强：《古代文学理论研究》。武汉：湖北教育出版社，2002年。
[Luo, Zongqiang. Studies in Ancient Literary Theory. Wuhan: Hubei Education Press, 2002.]
Mitchell, W. J. T.. Iconology. London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
阮元校刻：《十三经注疏》，北京：中华书局，2009年。
[Ruan, Yuan. Notes on the Thirteen Classics. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company，2009.]
爱德华.W.赛义德：《文化与帝国主义》，李琨译。北京：三联书店，2003年。
[Said, Edward W.. Culture and Imperialism. Trans. Li Kun. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2003.]
叔本华：《叔本华思想随笔》，韦启昌译。上海：世纪出版集团&上海人民出版社，2005年。
[Schopenhauer, Arthur. Intellectual Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer. Trans. Wei Qichang. Shanghai: Century Publishing House & Shanghai Renmin Press, 2005.]
唐圭璋：《词学论丛》。上海：上海古籍出版社，1986年。
[Tang, Guizhang. Collected Papers on the Study of Ci-Poetry. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press, 1986.]
王国维：《人间词·人间词话注评》，陈鸿祥编。南京：江苏古籍出版社，2002年。
[Wang, Guowei. Ci-Poetry from This World and Commentaries on the Ci-Poetry from This World. Ed. Chen Hongxiang. Nanjing: Jiangsu Ancient Books Press, 2002.]
——:《王国维遗书》第三册。上海：上海书店，1983年。
[---. Posthumous Writings of Wang Guowei. Volume III. Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore Press, 1983.]
王士禛：《带经堂诗话》。北京：人民文学出版社，1982年。
[Wang, Shizhen. Poetry Commentaries from the Daijing Study. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House, 1982.]
王廷相：《王廷相集》。王孝鱼点校。北京：中华书局，1989年。
[Wang, Tingxiang. Literary Collection of Wang Tingxiang. Ed. Wang Xiaoyu. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1989.]
小川环树：《论中国诗》，谭汝谦、陈志诚、梁国豪译。贵阳：贵州出版集团公司&贵州人民出版社，2009年。
[Ogawa, Tamaki. On Chinese Poetry. Trans. Tan Ruqian, et al. Guiyang: Guizhou Publishing House and Guizhou People’s Publishing House, 2009.]
萧华荣：《中国古典诗学理论史》。上海：华东师范大学出版社，2005年。
[Xiao, Huarong. A History of Chinese Classical Theory of Poetry. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2005.]
特里•伊格尔顿：《美学意识形态》，王杰等译。桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2001年。
[Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Trans. Wang Jie, et al. Guilin: Guangxi Normal
University Press, 2001.]
张伯伟：《钟嵘诗品研究》。南京：南京大学出版社，1999年。
[Zhang, Bowei. Studies on Zhong Rong’s Poetry Review. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1999. ]
赵毅衡：《远游的诗神》。成都：四川人民出版社，1985年。
[Zhao, Yiheng. The Muse from Cathay. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House, 1985.]
朱自清：《诗言志辩》。北京：古籍出版社，1956年。
[Zhu, Ziqing. An Apology of “Poetry as an Expression of Aspiration”. Beijing: Ancient Books Press, 1956.]

[1]	斯维. 从不幸结局到自觉意志：论王国维悲剧观念的转变 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 129-138.
[2]	蒋浩伟. 审美主义的政治伦理：王国维早期诗学和思想中的“美”与“德” [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(2): 166-174.
[3]	杨柏岭. 王国维“直观”说与“托兴”象征的填词新实践 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(2): 179-192.
[4]	徐燕琳. 王国维《宋元戏曲史》文体建构述论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(1): 157-165.
[5]	耿志. “境界”说是否着眼于“感受”——与叶嘉莹先生商榷 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(2): 94-99.

“把中国的还给中国”——“隔与不隔”与“赋、比、兴”的一种对位阅读

"Return What is China’s to China": A Contrapuntal Reading of "the Veiled and the Unveiled" and "Fu, Bi, Xing"

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价