欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 170-176.

• 专题:现象学美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

艺术与物性——对一个海德格尔引发的争论的考察

汪正龙   

  1. 南京大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2018-01-25 发布日期:2018-10-19
  • 作者简介:汪正龙,文学博士,南京大学文学院教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为文学理论、西方美学。

Art and Objecthood: An Explication of the Debate Inspired by Martin Heidegger

Wang Zhenglong   

  1. the School of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University
  • Online:2018-01-25 Published:2018-10-19
  • About author:Wang Zhenglong, Ph.D., is a professor at the School of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University, with research interests in literary theory and western aesthetics.

摘要: 海德格尔中后期提出了艺术与物性的关系问题,批评了特性的载体、感觉多样性的统一体和具有形式的质料三种关于物的规定方式,认为创作是让某物作为一个被生产的东西而出现,作品把物因素置入敞开的领域中加以显现。海德格尔的思考奠基于其艺术存在论,体现了他对艺术是什么以及人是什么的思考,与20世纪艺术的走向相关联,进而成为当代美学以及艺术理论中争论的一个核心问题。虽然其他美学家或思想家大多不是沿着海德格尔本人的思路,而似乎是将其批评过的思路加以改造进行探讨,但是在反模仿论、反形而上学方面却与海氏异曲同工。

关键词: 海德格尔, 艺术, 物性, 质料, 反形而上学

Abstract: In his middle and later writings, Heidegger puts forward the issue of the relation of art and objecthood, holding that creation presents an object as a production and an artwork manifests the thingly element in a broad field, with criticism of the three definitions of the thing: the thing as a carrier of properties, the thing as a unit of sensorial perception, and the thing as matter moulded in a particular form. Heidegger's ideas based on his art ontology reflect his thoughts about what art is and what a human being is, which are related to the art trends of the 20th century and then become a core issue of contemporary debates in aesthetics and art theory. Although other aestheticians or thinkers seem to discuss such issues in a remoulding way of what Heidegger criticizes while seldom following his own thinking, they are similar with Heidegger in the terms of anti-mimesis and anti-metaphysics.

Key words: Heidegger, art, objecthood, substance, anti-metaphysics