欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 193-200.

• 西方文论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

诱惑:从“美学阶段”到后现代镜像——论鲍德里亚对克尔凯郭尔的解读

尚景建   

  1. 中国人民大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2018-10-17
  • 作者简介:尚景建,中国人民大学文学院博士后,主要从事文学理论和外国文学研究。

Seduction: from the "Aesthetic Stage" to the Postmodern Mirror: Baudrillard's Interpretation of Kierkegaard's Seduction

Shang Jingjian   

  1. School of Liberal Arts, Renmin University of China
  • Online:2017-09-25 Published:2018-10-17
  • About author:Shang Jingjian is a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Liberal Arts, Renmin University of China. His main research field is literary theory.

摘要: 在《论诱惑》中,鲍德里亚对克尔凯郭尔的诱惑观念进行了解读。克尔凯郭尔将诱惑视为“美学阶段”男性对女性的引诱行为,分为唐璜的肉体诱惑与约翰尼斯的精神诱惑,同时也是苏格拉底“助产术”和耶稣布道中的精神诱导。鲍德里亚更加关注女性的诱惑本质,他将女性的诱惑视为游戏,以其表面性和无意义性消解两性、权力、生产中的等级模式。他认为约翰尼斯的男性诱惑虽然是一种人为策略,却是自然“女性诱惑者”的“镜像”,更能体现女性诱惑的强大。他的诱惑概念沿袭了克尔凯郭尔对理性的反思,同时也凸显了诱惑在后现代的消解特性。

关键词: 诱惑, 克尔凯郭尔, 鲍德里亚, “美学阶段”, 后现代

Abstract: In his Seduction, Baudrillard interprets Kierkegaard's concept of seduction: he regards seduction as a behavior of the "aesthetic stage", including Don Juan's physical seduction and the spiritual seduction of Johannes, represented as the male's desire and seduction to women, and also as a guiding spirit of Socrates' maieutics and Jesus' sermons, while Baudrillard is concerned more about nature of women's seduction. He regards seduction as a game which disintegrates the hierarchy of gender, power and production with its superficiality and meaninglessness, from the post-modern perspective. He considers Johannes' seduction as an artificial strategy, which is the mirror image of the female seduction and therefore is a stronger reflection of the invincibility of seduction. His concept of seduction follows Kierkegaard's reflection on reason, and also highlights the postmodern deconstruction of seduction.

Key words: seduction, Kierkegaard, Baudrillard, "aesthetic stage", postmodern