从“诗品”到“曲品”：论吕天成、祁彪佳的曲品批评

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 88-94.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇下一篇

从“诗品”到“曲品”：论吕天成、祁彪佳的曲品批评

汪超

安庆师范大学文学院

出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2018-01-24
作者简介:汪超，文学博士，安徽省安庆师范大学文学院副教授，主要从事古典戏剧理论和地方戏曲文化研究。
基金资助:
本文系安徽省哲社规划一般项目“明清安徽文人戏曲研究”[项目编号：AHSKY2016D148]、安徽省人文社科重点项目“黄梅戏人才培养与生态建设研究”[项目编号：SK2016A055]阶段性成果。

From "Poetry Critique" to "Drama Critique": Lü Tiancheng and Qi Biaojia's Critique of Drama

Wang Chao

Anqing Normal University

Online:2017-05-25 Published:2018-01-24
About author:Wang Chao, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the College of Arts, Anqing Normal University. His academic interests include classical Chinese drama theories and Chinese local drama cultures.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “曲品”作为明代戏曲批评的重要形态，对诗文等品评范式有所移植借鉴，具体为溯源得委的流派意识、品第高下的比较意识、意象譬喻的审美意识。同时，吕天成、祁彪佳结合诗学批评的本色理论，追求“境”“味”的审美趣味，调整“书品”“画品”里“神、妙、能、具”品的设置，实现“曲品”内涵的新变阐述，从而折射出明代戏曲观念的嬗变：从文词格律转向整体审美风格的讨论、“尚法”与“尚意”论争辨析的再现等，体现出“曲品”批评形态的独特价值，以及明代戏曲理论的时代风貌。

关键词: 诗品, 曲品, 吕天成, 祁彪佳

Abstract: "Drama critique", an important form of critical studies of drama in the Ming dynasty, benefits more or less from the critical paradigms of poetry and prose in terms of the consciousness of different schools, the awareness of comparison and the image- and analogy-based aesthetical mindset. Meanwhile, Lü Tiancheng and Qi Biaojia, starting from the "nature and naturalness" theory in poetry criticism, pursue an aesthetical taste characterized by "ideo-mood-imagery" and "feel". By modifying the various indexes of "calligraphic critique" and "painting critique", including the "spirit, exquisiteness, potential and embodiment", they successfully refresh the essence of "drama critique", which reflects the evolution of concepts on drama in the Ming dynasty: the shift of focuses from wording and metrics to overall aesthetic style and to the "skill" versus "subject" debate, etc., and highlights the unique value of "drama critique" as a critical approach.

Key words: poetry critique, drama critique, Lü Tiancheng, Qi Biaojia

汪超. 从“诗品”到“曲品”：论吕天成、祁彪佳的曲品批评[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 88-94.

Wang Chao. From "Poetry Critique" to "Drama Critique": Lü Tiancheng and Qi Biaojia's Critique of Drama[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(3): 88-94.

陈维昭:《中国戏曲的双重意义阈:陈维昭古典戏曲论集》。南京:凤凰出版社,2011年。[Chen,Weizhao.Double Threshold of Chinese Significance:Chen Weizhao on Classical Opera.Nanjing:Phoenix Publishing House,2011.]
邓椿:《画继》。北京:人民美术出版社,1964年。[Deng,Chun.Painting Continuation.Beijing:People Painting Publishing House,1964.]
何良俊:《四友斋丛说》。北京:中华书局,1959年。[He,Liangjun.Comments in Siyouzhai.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1959.]
何志明潘运告:《唐五代画论》。长沙:湖南美术出版社,1997年。[He,Zhiming and Pan Yungao.Theory of Painting in the Tang and Five Dynasties.Changsha:Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House,1997.]
黄休复:《益州名画录》。北京:人民美术出版社,1964年。[Huang,Xiufu.The Catalog of Famous Paintings in Yizhou.Beijing:People Painting Publishing House,1964.]
皎然:《诗式》,李壮鹰校注。北京:人民文学出版社,2003年。[Jiao,Ran.Shi Shi(Types of Poetry).Ed.Li,Zhuangying.Beijing:People Literature Publishing House,2003.]
吕天成:《曲品》,吴书荫校注。北京:中华书局,2006年。[Lü,Tiancheng.Drama Judgement.Ed.Wu,Shuyin.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,2006.]
祁彪佳:《远山堂曲品》,《历代曲话汇编·明代编》(第三集),俞为民,孙蓉蓉编。合肥:黄山书社,2009年。[Qi,Biaojia.Yuanshantang Drama Judge.Collection of Drama Thesis in Past Dynasties(Third Volumn).Eds.Yu,Weimin,and Sun Rongrong.Hefei:Huangshan Book Company,2009.]
谭帆:“‘行家之品’和‘文人之品’---吕天成、祁彪佳戏曲审美思想的比较”,《艺术百家》(1)1987:87-93。[Tan,Fan.“Expert Comment and Literati Comment---Comparatively About Aesthetic Ideas of Lü,Tiancheng&Qi,Biaojia,”Hundred Schools In Arts(1)1987:87-93.]
王骥德:《曲律》,陈多、叶长海注释。上海:上海古籍出版社,2012年。[Wang,Jide.Drama Classical.Annotated.Chen,Duo,and Ye,Changhai.Shanghai:Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House,2012.]
严羽:《沧浪诗话》,郭绍虞校释。北京:人民文学出版社,1961年。[Yan,Yu.Cang Lang's Notes on Poets and Poetry.Ed.Guo,Shaoyu.Beijing:People Literature Publishing House,1961.]
于安澜:《画品丛书》。上海:上海人民美术出版社,1983年。[Yu,Anlan.Series of Painting Judge.Shanghai:Shanghai People Painting Publishing House,1983.]
袁昂:《古今书评》,《历代书法论文选》,黄简编。上海:上海书画出版社,1979年。[Yuan Ang,Calligraphy criticism in ancient and modern.Selection of Calligraphy Thesis in Past Dynasties.Ed.Huang Jian.Shanghai:Shanghai Painting and Calligraphy Publishing House,1979.]
章学诚:《校雠通义》。北京:中华书局,1985年。[Zhang,Xuecheng.Emendation General Education.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1985.]
钟嵘:《诗品》,周振甫译注。北京:中华书局,2012年。[Zhong,Rong.Poetry Judge.Annotated.Zhou,Zhenfu.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,2012.]
朱权:《太和正音谱》,《历代曲话汇编》“明代编”(第一集)。合肥:黄山书社,2009年。[Zhu,Quan.Taihe pronunciation spectrum.Collection of Drama Thesis in Past Dynasties(first).Ed.Yu,Weimin,and Sun Rongrong.Hefei:Huangshan Book Company,2009.]

[1]	张诗洋. 论祁彪佳戏曲批评的突破与局限 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(2): 158-166.
[2]	杨焄. 现代学术史上的“陶诗品第”之争 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(2): 118-134.
[3]	马涛. “复性”与“游艺”：论刘熙载的“内圣”境界与其“诗品”理想的融通 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(2): 144-155.

从“诗品”到“曲品”：论吕天成、祁彪佳的曲品批评

From "Poetry Critique" to "Drama Critique": Lü Tiancheng and Qi Biaojia's Critique of Drama

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价