欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 78-87.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“吴江派”与“临川派”之构建与检讨——以民国时期戏曲史著为考察对象

程华平   

  1. 华东师范大学中文系
  • 出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2018-01-24
  • 作者简介:程华平,文学博士,华东师范大学中文系教授,主要从事元明清文学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社科项目“民国传奇杂剧史论”[项目编号:15BZW121]阶段性成果。

The Construction and Review of the Wujiang School and Linchuan School: A Study of the History Research Books of Traditional Chinese Drama in the Republic of China

Cheng Huaping   

  1. the Department of Chinese at East China Normal University
  • Online:2017-05-25 Published:2018-01-24
  • About author:Cheng Huaping, Ph.D. in Literature, is a professor in the Department of Chinese at East China Normal University. His research interest is literature of the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

摘要: 戏曲史上“吴江派”与“临川派”的命名得以确立,是由民国时期的戏曲史家完成的。由于这些戏曲史家既没有对“流派”概念加以界定,又缺乏流派划分应遵循的共识与准则,各家史著在两派成员的统系归属、成员人数的多寡上各有不同;在阐释两派理论主张时,也存在夸大彼此之间观点对立的现象。民国以来一些戏曲史家之所以不承认临川派的存在,很大程度上在于他们是在用现代流派理论来衡量古代文学流派,因而在流派认知上出现了偏误。因此,构建切合古代戏曲发展实际的流派理论,就显得尤为必要了。

关键词: 民国戏曲史, 吴江派, 临川派, 研究

Abstract: The naming of Wujiang Group and Linchuan School in the history of drama was established by drama historians of the Republic of China. Because these drama historians had neither defined the concept of School, nor had they reached a consensus and guidelines that should be followed in the division of the School. These drama history research books differed in the classification and number of dramatists. In interpreting the theory of the two factions, there is also a tendency to exaggerate the opposition between the two groups. Since the Republic of China, some drama historians had denied the existence of Linchuan School, largely because they used modern school theory to measure the ancient literary groups. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a theory which is in line with the actual development of ancient drama.

Key words: Drama History in Republic of China, Wujiang School, Linchuan School, Research