欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 89-99.

• 专题:乐学与诗(曲)学 • 上一篇    下一篇

百年《诗经》研究献疑

解玉峰   

  1. 南京大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2017-11-26
  • 作者简介:解玉峰,南京大学文学院教授,主要从事中国古代戏曲、古代文学等方面研究。

Questions about Studies of The Book of Songs in the Recent Century

Xie Yufeng   

  1. Liberal Arts at Nanjing University
  • Online:2017-09-25 Published:2017-11-26
  • About author:Xie Yufeng is a professor in the School of Liberal Arts at Nanjing University. His main research interests focus on classical Chinese drama and classical Chinese literature.

摘要: 胡适等近代学者勇于打破传统的禁锢,为近百年来的《诗经》研究做出许多了开创性贡献,其影响至今犹存。自新文化运动到现在,人们对相关《诗经》的基本问题也达成一些共识:如《诗经》是中国最早的诗歌总集、《诗经》皆为“乐歌”、《诗经》分“风”“雅”“颂”三类等。然而相关《诗经》这些基本问题,或者还需要我们重新面对和思考,有些学术共识也可能存在严重的误解。今人理解《诗经》当然离不开前人的启发和引导,但我们也可能不自觉地被一些前人所误导,这些“前人”既包括汉唐人或宋元人、明清人,也包括胡适之、顾颉刚等近代人。只有不断拨开重重迷障,才能不断接近历史真相,《诗经》真相的研究可能永远是在路上。

关键词: 《诗经》, 诗歌总集, 乐歌, “风”“雅”“颂”

Abstract: Many scholars such as Hu Shi have made pioneering contributions to the researches of The Book of Songs in the recent century. They have found common ground regarding some issues about The Book of Songs: it is the earliest poetry collection in China; all the poems are songs; there are three types of poems, namely, feng, ya, and song. But there might be serious misunderstandings in these aspects, which need reinvestigation. We should express gratitude to predecessors who enlighten us and misguide us simultaneously. It is our destiny that we will be permanently on the road to truth of The Book of Songs.

Key words: The Book of Songs, poetry collection, songs; feng ya song