海德格尔为什么给“艺术”打叉？——《克利笔记》与艺术的二律背反

吴苗淼

PDF(1267 KB)

文艺理论研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3) : 141-150.

文论互鉴

海德格尔为什么给“艺术”打叉？——《克利笔记》与艺术的二律背反

吴苗淼

作者信息 +

Why Did Heidegger Mark a Cross on “Art”: “Notes on Klee” and the Antinomy of Art

Wu Miaomiao

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

尽管海德格尔把艺术认定为拯救技术时代危机的希望,但在其作于20世纪50年代的手稿《克利笔记》中,他却实行了一种创造性的书写行为,即在“艺术”一词上面打叉。通过对《克利笔记》及相关文本的分析可以发现,这个“艺术之叉”有两个相反相成的含义,否定性的含义表示艺术对形而上学的表象和体验方式的抵抗,肯定性的含义则暗示了艺术向着作为“

”的自身回转。这也集中体现了海德格尔艺术哲学中的二律背反,即两个各自成立又相互矛盾的命题:“艺术本身有着形而上学的本质”与“艺术本身有着转变的契机”。这种二律背反思想根植于海德格尔后期思想的最深处,也标志着海德格尔艺术哲学的现实关切,对于当代艺术的发展具有启发与警示的价值与意义。

Abstract

While Heidegger identified art as the beacon of hope amidst the technological era's crises, his action of inscribing a cross over the word “art” in his 1950s manuscript, “Notes on Klee,” symbolizes a profound and creative engagement with art's essence and its paradoxes. Through analyzing “Notes on Klee” and other related texts, it can be found that this “cross on art” has two opposite but complementary meanings. Negatively, it signifies art's resistance to metaphysical representation and experiential modalities. Positively, it suggests art's potential for self-referential transformation towards its essence as “

” (techne).Thus it embodies the antinomy in Heidegger's philosophy of art, namely, two respectively established but contradictory propositions, “art itself having the essence of metaphysics” and “art itself having the opportunity for transformation.” This antinomy, deeply embedded in Heidegger's later thought, highlights the philosophical stakes of Heidegger's engagement with art. It serves as a critical reflection on and a cautionary note about contemporary art's evolution, offering insights into the enduring complexities art faces in transcending its metaphysical constraints while seeking authentic transformation.

导出引用

吴苗淼. 海德格尔为什么给“艺术”打叉？——《克利笔记》与艺术的二律背反[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2024, 44(3): 141-150

Wu Miaomiao. Why Did Heidegger Mark a Cross on “Art”: “Notes on Klee” and the Antinomy of Art[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2024, 44(3): 141-150

参考文献

雅克·德里达:《论精神——海德格尔与问题》,朱刚译。上海:上海译文出版社,2008年。
[Derrida, Jacques. Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question. Trans. Zhu Gang. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2008.]
道格拉斯·霍尔:《克利》,曹丹苧译。长沙:湖南美术出版社,2017年。
[Hall, Douglas. Klee. Trans. Cao Danning. Changsha: Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 2017.]
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe, Band 4: Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1981.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 5: Holzwege. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrman. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1977.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 7: Vortärge und Aufsätze. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrman. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2000.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 9: Wegmarken. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrman. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1976.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 11: Identität und Differenz. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2006.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 12: Unterwegs zur Sprache. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrman. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1985.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 14: Zur Sache des Denkens. Ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2007.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 16: Reden und andere Zeugnisse eines Lebensweges, 19101976. Ed. Hermann Heidegger. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2000.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 40: Einführung in die Metaphysik. Ed. Petra Jaeger. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1983.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 74: Zum Wesen der Sprache und zur Frage nach der Kunst. Ed. Thomas Regehly. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2010.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 77: Feldweg-Gespräch. Ed. Ingrid Schüßler. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1995.
---. Gesamtausgabe, Band 97: Anmerkungen I-V (Schwarze Hefte 19421948). Ed. Peter Trawny. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 2015.
---. “Notizen zu Klee/ Notes on Klee,” Trans. María del Rosario Acosta López, et al. Philosophy Today 61.1(2017):717.
弗雷德里克·詹明信:《晚期资本主义的文化逻辑》,张旭东编,陈清侨、严锋等译。北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013年。
[Jameson, Fredric. The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Ed. Zhang Xudong. Trans. Chen Qingqiao and Yan Feng. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2013.]
Klee, Paul. “Die Ausstellung des Modernen Bundes im Kunsthaus Zürich.” Die Alpen. Monatsschrift für Schweizerische und Allgemeine Kultur 12(1912):696704.
——:《克利的日记》,雨云译。重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011年。
[---. Diaries of Paul Klee. Trans. Yu Yun. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2011.]
---. “Schöpferische Konfession.” Tribüne der Kunst und Zeit: Eine Schriftensammlung, XIII Schöpferische Konfession. Ed. Kasimir Edschmid. Berlin: Erich Reiß Verlag, 1920.2840.
Petzet, Heinrich Wiegand. Encounters and Dialogues with Martin Heidegger, 19291976. Trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Sallis, John. Klee's Mirror. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015.
Schapiro, Meyer. Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society. New York: George Braziller Inc., 1994.
Schmidt, Dennis J. Between Word and Image: Heidegger, Klee, and Gadamer on Gesture and Genesis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.
---. “Introduction to Heidegger's ‘Notes on Klee’.” Philosophy Today 61.1(2017):36.
Seubold, Günter. “Heideggers Nachgelassene Klee-Notizen.” Heidegger Studies 9(1993):512.
张一兵:《回到海德格尔——本有与构境》。北京:商务印书馆,2014年。
[Zhang, Yibing. Back to Heidegger: Ereignis and Situating. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2014.]