欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 151-161.

• 现当代文论与文化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国现代“美学范畴”概念的发生

韩伟   

  • 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-07-16
  • 作者简介:韩伟,文学博士,黑龙江大学文学院教授,主要从事中国古代文论、文艺美学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“新时代中国特色美学基本理论问题研究”[项目编号:18VXK010]、国家社科基金一般项目“古代乐论视域下中国美学范畴形成与建构研究”[项目编号:20BZW031]阶段性成果。

The Rise of the Concept of “Aesthetic Categories” in Modern China

Han Wei   

  • Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-07-16
  • About author:Han Wei, Ph.D., is a Professor in the College of Chinese Language and Literature, Heilongjiang University, with research interests in ancient Chinese literary theory and aesthetics.
  • Supported by:
    Major Project of National Social Sciences Fund (18VXK010) and the General Project of National Social Sciences Fund (20BZW031).

摘要: 美学范畴作为中国美学的重要基质,是进行学术研究的基本依托。19世纪末20世纪初,“美学”“范畴”作为日语借词进入中国学术语境,但两者鲜有连用,以“美学”为视域的“范畴”言说,亦局限在西方式、哲学式的框架下。20世纪20年代以后,“美感范畴”“中国美学的范畴”“审美范畴”等术语的出现,不仅表明中西对话开始平等,也彰显出哲学美学与艺术美学的深度交融,更加为中国式“美学范畴”概念及认知的出现提供了学理依据。20世纪80年代以后,学科化的努力及权力话语的影响,推动了“美学范畴”的“借形立魂”进程,中国意义上的“美学范畴”认知最终形成,个案研究系统展开。总体上,中国“美学范畴”经历了哲学范畴期、美感范畴期、美学范畴期三个阶段,其中蕴含着“引入——对接本土化——艺术学抽象化”的内在理路,这一过程亦显现出学科意义上“中国美学”确立、发展的历史脉络。

关键词: 中国美学, 美学范畴, 学科化

Abstract: The concept of aesthetic categories (meixue fanchou) serves as a cornerstone of Chinese aesthetics. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the terms “aesthetics” and “categories” entered the Chinese academic discourse as loanwords from Japanese, but they were rarely used in conjunction. Discussions surrounding “categories” within the relam of “aesthetics” remained confined to the Western and philosophical frameworks. However, following the 1920s, phrases such as “aesthetic-perception categories” (meigan fanchou), “categories of Chinese aesthetics”, and “aesthetic-appreciation categories” (shenmei fanchou) emerged, signaling not only a more equitable dialogue between China and the West but also a deep integration between philosophical aesthetics and artistic aesthetics, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the conceptualization and understanding of “aesthetic categories” in the Chinese context. Subsequently, during the 1980s, efforts towards disciplinary systemization and the influence of power discourse propelled the process of “borrowing form and establishing soul” of “aesthetic categories.” Consequently, the recognition of Chinese “aesthetic categories” took shape, leading to systematic case studies. Overall, the Chinese conceptualization of “aesthetic categories” has traversed three stages: the “philosophical category” stage, the “aesthetic-perception category” stage, and the “aesthetic category” stage, embodying the inherent logic of “introduction-localization-artistic abstraction.” This process also elucidated the historical context of establishing and developing “Chinese aesthetics” within academia.

Key words: Chinese aesthetics, aesthetic categories, discipline-systemizing