“准先验性”和“与在”:德里达与南希论素描

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 素描不但在艺术中占据独特且重要的位置,更因其中蕴含的思之潜能为众多思想家所关注。现代法国哲学常以对于艺术的讨论来承载哲思,素描则因其与书写的联系受到解构主义的关注。德里达与南希都曾写过讨论素描的作品,在他们的思考中,素描皆与他者密切相关。但他们二人对他者的思考却有着不同侧重:德里达肯定他者之为全然他者,赋予其准先验色彩,进而更强调他者在意义建构之中的必须与我们因此而背负的债务,而南希在肯定差异与间隔的基础上更倾向于思考一种“与在”模式。深入解读德里达与南希关于素描的讨论,将有助于我们理解这两位解构阵营内思想家的承续与差异,同时也能澄清二者解构思想的内在核心。

关键词: 素描, 他者, 解构, 德里达, 南希, 与在

Abstract: In the camp of deconstruction, drawing is an important device of contemplation thanks to its explicit connection with the trace of writing. Both Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy wrote about drawing. In their works, drawing is all about revealing the relation to the Other. However close these thoughts may seem to be, the two philosophers differ in their thinking about the Other. Derrida affirms the Other in a holistic manner and posits it as a quasi-transcendental being. In contrast, Nancy is more inclined to present a form of “being-with” the Other on the basis of affirming heterogeneity and distance. A close analysis of Derrida's and Nancy's thought on drawing offers us an approach to the inner core of their deconstructionist ideas as well as clarifying the continuity and difference between the two deconstructionist thinkers.

Key words: drawing, the Other, deconstruction, Derrida, Nancy, being-with

苏林. “准先验性”和“与在”:德里达与南希论素描[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2024, 44(1): 36-45.

Su Lin. “Quasi-Transcendental” and “Being-with”: Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy on Drawing[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2024, 44(1): 36-45.

Bennington, Geoffrey, and Jacques Derrida. Jacques Derrida. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Berger, John. “To Take Paper, To Draw: A World through Lines.” Drawing Us In: How We Experience Visual Art. Eds. Deborah Chasman and Edna Chiang. Boston: Beacon Press, 2000.118124.
Caputo, John D. The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without Religion. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997.
Derrida, Jacques. “Le Dessin par Quatre Chemins.” Penser à ne pas Voir. Écrits sur les Arts du Visible 19792004. Paris: La Différence, 2013.201203.
---. Memoirs of the Blind: Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
---. On Touching: Jean-Luc Nancy. Trans. Christine Irizarry. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
---. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
---. The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
雅克·德里达张宁:《解构之旅·中国印记》,张宁编译。南京:南京大学出版社,2009年。
[Derrida, Jacques, and Zhang Ning. The Journey of Deconstruction. Trans. and ed. Zhang Ning. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2009.]
Descartes, René. “Treatise on Light and Other Principal Objects of the Senses.” The World and Other Writings. Trans. and ed. Stephen Gaukroger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.375.
乔治·迪迪于贝尔曼:《在图像面前》,陈元译。长沙:湖南美术出版社,2015年。
[Didi-Huberman, Georges. Confronting Images. Trans. Chen Yuan. Changsha: Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 2015.]
Guibal, Francis, and Jean-Clet Martin, eds. Sens en Tous Sens. Autour de Travaux de Jean-Luc Nancy. Paris: Galilee, 2004.
Kearney, Richard, ed. Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, and Jean-Luc Nancy. Retreating the Political. Ed. Simon Sparks. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. Being Singular Plural. Trans. Robert D. Richardson and Anne E. O'Byrne. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
---. La Communauté Désœuvrée. Paris: Christian Bourgois Éditeur, 1999.
---. The Birth to Presence. Trans. Brian Holmes, et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.
---. The Muses. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
---. The Pleasure in Drawing. Trans. Philip Armstrong. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.
---. The Sense of the World. Trans. Jeffrey S. Librett. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
柏拉图:《理想国》,张竹明译。南京:译林出版社,2012年。
[Plato. The Republic. Trans. Zhang Zhuming. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2012.]
保尔·瓦雷里:《德加,舞蹈,素描》,杨杰、张慧译。上海:华东师范大学出版社,2018年。
[Valery, Paul. Degas, Dance, Drawing. Trans. Yang Jie and Zhang Hui. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2018.]
魏柯玲:《画与真——论德里达〈绘画中的真理〉》,《文艺研究》2(2020):148—160。
[Wei, Keling. “Painting and Truth: On Derrida's La Vérité en Peinture.” Literature & Art Studies 2(2020):148-160.]
海因里希·沃尔夫林:《美术史的基本概念:后期艺术中的风格发展问题》,潘耀昌译。北京:北京大学出版社,2011年。
[Wolfflin, Heinrich. Principles of Arts History. Trans. Pan Yaochang. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011.]

[1]	庄懿. 从“根本恶”到无法言说的“恶”——二战后法国情境下的概念考古 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2024, 44(1): 215-223.
[2]	李石. 从“重写鲁迅”到“弑父”——对美国华人学者鲁迅批评的历史考察与反思 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(6): 82-90.
[3]	肖锦龙. 德里达论文学语言——以《罗米欧与朱丽叶》为范例 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(1): 70-78.
[4]	付昌玲. 文学文本意义生成的知识谱系考察 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(4): 201-210.
[5]	毕晓. 巴赫金与列维纳斯他者伦理学比较及其美学意义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(6): 185-193.
[6]	王琦. 论让吕克·南希对崇高概念的重释 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(6): 204-211.
[7]	徐亮. 理论与死亡 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(5): 41-49.
[8]	林云柯. 他者心灵，政治有机体及日常语言的“戏剧化”本性——以斯坦利·卡维尔论《科利奥兰纳斯》为例 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(6): 205-212.
[9]	何卫华. 创伤叙事的可能、建构性和功用 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(2): 170-178.
[10]	赵雪梅. 文学创伤理论评述——历史、现状与反思 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(1): 201-211.
[11]	原元. 异（体）类的主体：幽灵学笼罩下的拉康 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(4): 150-161.
[12]	张春晓 . 从反人文主义到一种狭义的后人类：跨越拟人辩证法 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(3): 48-56.
[13]	赵雪梅. 克里斯蒂娃与后现代文论之发生 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(1): 69-79.
[14]	刘毅青. 我们的现代性：汉语学术的跨文化潜力 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(6): 26-34.
[15]	李雪, 毕晓. 摹仿的暴力与他者问题——勒内·基拉尔新解 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(4): 143-150.

“准先验性”和“与在”:德里达与南希论素描

“Quasi-Transcendental” and “Being-with”: Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy on Drawing

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价