欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 30-44.

• 西方文论与美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

话语行为与文学虚构

马大康   

  1. 温州大学人文学院
  • 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-03-11
  • 作者简介:马大康,温州大学人文学院教授,主要从事美学、文艺学研究。
  • 基金资助:

    本文为国家社科基金项目“现代、后现代视域中的文学虚构问题研究”(10BZW003)的阶段成果。

Speech Act and the Fiction in Literature

Ma Dakang   

  1. the College of Humanities, Wenzhou University (Wenzhou 325035, China)
  • Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-03-11
  • About author:Ma Dakang is a professor in the College of Humanities, Wenzhou University (Wenzhou 325035, China), with research interests in aesthetics, literature research.

摘要: 文学虚构是话语施为意义上的虚构,而非表述意义上的虚构。文学正是依据文化惯例的授权来实施并宣示一个行为:建构虚构世界。它利用种种途径凸显话语施为的建构性,强化话语的言外之力,并在人与话语间建立起新的意向性关系:主体间性关系。在这种关系中,人和话语及语词的所有潜能都被调动起来,参与到建构虚构世界的活动中。依据这种对文学虚构的新界定,诸如文学话语与历史话语的异同、文学独立性与社会批判性的关系、文学活动中权力运作的复杂性等文艺学基本问题可以得到较为合理的解释。

关键词: 话语行为, 文学虚构, 意向性关系, 修辞策略, 文化权力

Abstract: Fiction in literature is the fiction in the sense of utterance performativity instead of that in the sense of representation. Authorized by cultural conventions, literature pronounces the construction of a fictional world as its primary action, and it exploits various strategies to highlight the constructive nature of utterance performativity and the illocutionary force of utterance. Thus, a new mode of intentional relationship can be constructed between people and utterance as the relationship of intersubjectivity, in which all the potentialities in people, utterances and words are summoned into the activities for constructing a fictional world. The paper concludes that, on the basis of this definition of literary fiction, more reasonable explanations may be found to some fundamental theoretical issues such as the difference between literary discourse and historical discourse, the relationship between the autonomy and the social critique of literature, and the power working in literary activities.

Key words: speech act, fiction in literature, intentional relationship, rhetoric strategy, cultural power