欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 165-174.

• 现当代文论与批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

人类学大视野中的故事变异与永恒问题——基于张爱玲与俄国作家尼古拉·列斯科夫的比较

刘俐俐   

  1. 南开大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-03-11
  • 作者简介:刘俐俐,文学硕士,南开大学文学院教授,博士生导师,主要从事文学理论与批评研究。
  • 基金资助:
    此文为刘俐俐承担的天津市2012年度哲学社会科学规划课题“张爱玲小说艺术与中国文学传统”(TJZW12-002)成果。

The Variations and Eternals of Stories from the Anthropological Perspective: Based on a Comparative Analysis on Eileen Chang and Nikolai Leskov

Liu Lili   

  1. the School of Literature, Nankai University (Tianjin 300071, China)
  • Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-03-11
  • About author:Liu Lili is a professor at the School of Literature, Nankai University (Tianjin 300071, China), with main research interest in literary theory and criticism.

摘要: 论文由本雅明“讲故事的人”界定的悖论,对本雅明的故事概念过于狭窄产生了疑问。疑问来自作者既有的故事思考:故事始终与人类相伴随;故事是感性认识对象;故事可满足人类对意义的需求;故事具有适应人类需求、条件变化而变化的特性。籍此,论文提出应建立人类学大视野的故事概念。论文选取本雅明认定的“讲故事的人”的俄国作家列斯科夫,以之与中国现代作家张爱玲比较分析。得出了如下结论:列斯科夫的故事是传统故事,传递经验以让人知道;张爱玲的故事是现代故事,传递体验以让人感悟,颠覆了本雅明所说的讲故事的人离我们远去了的断言。籍此就故事的变异与永恒问题形成如下基本看法:故事概念很大,小说概念应置于故事概念之下;故事给了小说各种故事讲法和风格以可能和机会,故事由此而变异;故事满足人类对意义需求的基本功能则永远不会变化;故事的人类学特质给予小说研究以新思路;呼吁关注和思考人类学大视野中故事的形而上思考与故事问题。

关键词: 人类学, 故事, 小说, 列斯科夫, 张爱玲

Abstract: This paper discusses Benjamin's paradox of "the story-teller" and questions the scope of his definition of the story. The premises for the question include: stories have always accompanied human activities; stories are the cognitive objects of human perception; stories meet people's need for meaning; stories adapt themselves to the changes of human needs and cultural conditions. Thus, this paper proposes a broader definition of story from the perspective of anthropology and makes a comparative analysis on Russian novelist Nikolai Leskov who was called a "story-teller" by Walter Benjamin and modern Chinese novelist Eileen Chang. The paper observes that the stories of Leskov are traditional stories aiming at informing the readers while Chang's stories are modern stories aiming at enlightening the readers. This undermines Benjamin's assertion that story-tellers have gone from us. The paper therefore puts forward some initial views on the variations and eternals of stories. Firstly, story is a broad concept which should include the novel as a component. Secondly, story provides novels with various ways of telling stories, while the story form may vary. Thirdly, the basic function of story to meet man's need for meaning never changes. Fourthly, the anthropological features of story may provide new ideas for the study of novels. Finally, the paper concludes that there is an absolute necessity of metaphysical thinking about story from the view of anthropology.

Key words: anthropology, story, novel, Nikolai Leskov, Eileen Chang