破碎的中国上古神系

朱大可

文艺理论研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1) : 192-201.

PDF(678 KB)
欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》, 2025年8月8日 星期五
PDF(678 KB)
文艺理论研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1) : 192-201.
专题:神话理论研究

破碎的中国上古神系

作者信息 +

The Fragmented Ancient Chinese God System

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

中国上古神话与其它文明不同之处,在于它的破碎性,而这破碎是源于先秦诸侯对历史文献的集体燔毁,而不仅是秦始皇的“焚书坑儒”。这场沉默的“文革”,导致了第一代中国神话的毁灭。而后,在亚洲大移民的背景中,印度、伊朗和西亚的神话片段,组成了以《山海经》为代表的第二代神话。这个新神系的建构,主要基于历时性的文化传播,而非共时性的“集体无意识”,它跟非洲智人向全球殖民的模式密切呼应。但是,新神话的建构遭到了轴心时代实用理性主义的阻拦。秦汉两代的帝王和文人,试图以祖先崇拜代替神祇崇拜,以历史叙事代替神话叙事,由此导致第二代中国神话的湮灭。

Abstract

Ancient Chinese mythology is different from those in other civilizations in its fragmentariness, and the fragmented nature is the result of the collective destruction of historical documents in the pre-Qin feudal states burnt down all historical documents, on top of the massive burning of books and the burying-alive of Confucian scholars during the reign of the First Emperor of Qin. This silent "cultural revolution" in the pre-Qin and Qin era resulted in the destruction of the first generation of Chinese mythology. During the wave of Asian emigration, myth fragments from India, Iran and West Asia constructed the second generation of mythology with The Legends of Mountains and Seas as its representative. The construction of a new god system, mainly based on the diachronic cultural transmission instead of synchronic collective unconsciousness, closely paralleled with the model that African homo sapiens responded to global colonization. However, the construction of a new mythology was blocked by pragmatic rationalism in the Axial Age. Emperors and scholars of Qin and Han dynasties tried to replace god worship with ancestor worship and to replace the historical narrative with myth narrative, which eventually led to the annihilation of the second generation of Chinese mythology.

关键词

共时性原型 / 历时性原型 / 神话镜像 / 庸俗历史主义 / 第一代神话 / 第二代神话

Key words

synchronic prototype / diachronic prototype / myth image / vulgar historicism / the first generation of myth / second generation of myth

引用本文

导出引用
朱大可. 破碎的中国上古神系[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(1): 192-201
ZHU Da-Ke. The Fragmented Ancient Chinese God System[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(1): 192-201

参考文献

陈奇猷:《韩非子新校注》。上海:上海古籍出版社,2000年。
[Chen, Qiyu. A New Annotated Han Fei Zi. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2000.]
顾颉刚:《汉代学术史略》。北京:东方出版社,1996年。
[Gu, Jiegang. A Brief History of Academics in Han Dynasty. Beijing: Dongfang Press, 1996.]
焦循:《孟子正义》,沈文倬点校。北京:中华书局,1987年。
[Jiao, Xun. Rectified Interpretation of Mencius. Proofread and Ed. Shen Wenzhuo. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1987.]
拉康:《拉康选集》,褚孝全译。上海:上海三联书店,2001年。
[Lacan, Jacaueo. A Lacan Reader. Trans. Chu Xiaoquan. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2001.]
无名氏:《山海经》,方韬译注。北京:中华书局,2009年。
[Anonymous. Legends of Mountains and Seas. Trans. and Annotated. Fang Tao. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2009.]
叶舒宪编:《神话—原型批评》。西安:陕西师范大学出版社,1987年。
[Ye, Shuxian, ed. Myth-Archetype Criticism. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 1987.]

PDF(678 KB)

5261

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/