欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 193-199.

• 专题:伊格尔顿研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论伊格尔顿的革命批评

王伟   

  1. 福建社会科学院文学所
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-11-11
  • 作者简介:王伟,文学博士,福建社会科学院文学所副研究员,主要从事文艺理论研究。

On Terry Eagleton's Revolutionary Criticism

Wang Wei   

  1. the Institute of Literature, Fujian Academy of Social Sciences (Fuzhou 350001, China)
  • Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-11-11
  • About author:Wang Wei, Ph.D., is an associate researcher at the Institute of Literature, Fujian Academy of Social Sciences (Fuzhou 350001, China), specializing in literary theory.

摘要: 伊格尔顿在解读本雅明时使用的“革命批评”范畴常被研究者等同于“政治批评”“意识形态批评”,而“革命批评”与文化革命、革命文化实践之间的密切联系及其中蕴含的革命性能量被弱化乃至忽略。伊格尔顿指出,“革命批评”既预示了当代解构主义的批评实践,又与解构主义有着质的差别。需要注意的是,他对解构主义的另一些描述有些漫画化、简单化。有学者认为,“革命批评”是伊格尔顿理想中的批评取向,这种看法忽视了“革命批评”中存在的唯心主义缺陷问题,也忽略了伊格尔顿对本雅明“星座化”批评模式的心仪与实践。

关键词: 伊格尔顿, 革命批评, 解构主义, 理想的批评

Abstract: The “revolutionary criticism” which Eagleton uses in the interpretation of Walter Benjamin is often equated with “political criticism” or “ideological criticism” by some researchers, but what have been downplayed or even ignored are the relationship between “revolutionary criticism”, cultural revolution, and the revolutionary cultural practice, as well as the revolutionary energy generated among them. Eagleton points out that the “revolutionary criticism” has anticipated the practice of contemporary deconstruction criticism, and yet they have qualitative difference. Significantly, some of his descriptions of deconstructionism are simplistic. Some scholars believe that the “revolutionary criticism” is his ideal criticism, which neglects the problem of its idealism, as well as his love for and practice of the “constellation” criticism of Walter Benjamin.

Key words: Eagleton, revolutionary criticism, deconstruction criticism, ideal criticism