欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 88-93.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“笔”之病犯论南朝“文笔说”

唐芸芸   

  1. 重庆师范大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-11-11
  • 作者简介:唐芸芸，文学博士，重庆师范大学文学院副教授，主要从事中国诗学研究。

A Discussion of "Wen Bi" Theory in the Southern Dynasties from the Taboos of "Bi"

Tang Yunyun   

  1.  the Chinese Department of Chongqing Normal University (Chongqing 401331, China)
  • Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-11-11
  • About author:Tang Yunyun, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Chinese Department of Chongqing Normal University (Chongqing 401331, China), with research focus on Chinese poetics.

PDF (PC)

76

摘要： 关于“文笔说”的讨论至今已延续良久。人们一直关注于其在文体分类中的作用。在《文镜秘府论》中，我们可以看到“笔”亦存在病犯，强调句中宫商和谐，且句末不押韵。由此我们得出，“文”“笔”之分，应该是骈体的写作方式在南朝时流行的体现。唐代“文笔”说的式微也与骈体的衰落有关。从这则材料还可以看出南朝人对声律的重视和探索，但这并不足以构成“纯文学”观念形成的依据。

关键词: “文笔”说, 病犯, 文镜秘府论, 骈体

Abstract: Scholars have been discussing the connection between "Wen Bi" theory and its function in the division of literary genres. The book Wenjing Mifu Lun emphasizes the harmony but does not require end rhyme. "Wen Bi" theory is closely linked to the parallel prose according to taboos of "Bi", and thus they share popularity in the Southern Dynasties and decline in Tang Dynasty. We can also conclude from this fact that there is study of rhythm in the Southern Dynasties, which, however, was not sufficient to prove that there was the idea of "pure literature" at that time.

Key words: "Wen Bi" theory, taboos, Wenjing Mifu Lun, the parallel prose