在全球景观中定位中国——反思海外世界的“中国性”和“华语表述”讨论

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文旨在通过回顾海外英语世界有关“中国性”的论述，指出各种讨论中所蕴含的意识形态结构和文化操控意图，点明“中国性”话语之中存在“被误用”和“故意被误用”两个层面，而且对“中国性”的提炼也不应该只局限在政治疆域之内，而应该开放为一种既包含本土内部的文化传承与新变，也包括广布海内外的中西文化对话的进程。特别是后一维度的加入，将能够有效遏制“中国性”蜕变成一种单一的民族中心主义或国家主义。而且应当承认，在某种意义上，“中国性”必须有它的不纯粹性，甚至于枝蔓旁出，乃至变种变性。惟其如此，我们才可以领会所谓的“中州正韵”不必只是原地打转或心无旁骛地一以贯之，也可以追踪、定位所谓的离散文学和华语表述，并将其视为对“中国性”的当代增益与充实。

关键词: 中国性, 离散, 华语表述, 身份认同

Abstract: This paper tries to reveal the ideological structure and cultural manipulation behind those discussions around the recent debate on Chineseness in the overseas world. It points out that intentional misuse should be further distinguished from the misuse in the discourse of Chineseness, and that the refinement of Chineseness should not be confined in the political field but be opened to include the cultural inheritance and renovation in the native land as well as the cultural progress through the dialogue between worldwide Chinese and Western. With the dialogue seeped through the debate, Chineseness may then be curbed from degenerating into a unilateral ethnocentrism or nationalism. It must be acknowledged that there should be adulterations in and different versions of the concept of Chineseness. Thus, the concept of orthodox Chinese essence can be used to track the trajectory and locate the position of diasporic literature and Sinophone so that it may supplement and expand our understanding of Chineseness.

Key words: Chineseness, diaspora, Sinophone, identity

余夏云. 在全球景观中定位中国——反思海外世界的“中国性”和“华语表述”讨论[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(1): 46-52.

Yu Xiayun. A Positioning of China in the Global Space: Reflecting the Overseas Debate on Chineseness and Sinophone[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(1): 46-52.

Ang, Ien. “Can One Say No to Chineseness? : Pushing the Limits of the Diasporic Paradigm.” Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory: Reimagining a Field. Ed. Chow Rey. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000. 281-300.
Appadurai, Arjun. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Public Culture 2. 2(1990): 1-17.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “Cosmopolitan Patriots.” Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Eds. Cheah Pheng and Bruce Robbins. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press, 1998. 91-114.
柏桦，余夏云：“今天：俄罗斯式的对抗美学”，《江汉大学学报》，1（2008）：45-50。
[Bai, Hua and Yu Xiayun. “Today: Resistant Aesthetics in Russian Style.” Journal of Jianghan University 1 (2008): 45-50.]
Bhabha, Homi. “Unsatisfied: Notes on Vernacular Cosmopolitanism.” Text and Nation: Cross-Disciplinary Essays on Cultural and National Identities. Eds. Laura Garcia-Moreno and Peter C. Pfeiffer. Columbia: Camden House, 1996. 191-207.
Chen, Xiaomei. Occidentalism: A Theory of Court-Discourse in Post-Mao China. New York: Oxford, 1995.
Chow, Rey. “Introduction: On Chineseness as a Theoretical Problem.” Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory: Reimagining a Field. Ed. Chow Rey. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.1-25.
周蕾：《写在家国以外》。香港：牛津大学出版社，1995年。
[Chow, Rey. Writing Diaspora. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995. ]
——：《原初的激情：视觉，性欲，民族志与中国当代电影》，孙绍谊译。台北：远流出版公司，1990年。
[---. Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema. Trans. Sun Shaoyi. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., 1995.]
Chun, Allen. “Fuck Chineseness: On the Ambiguities of Ethnicity as Culture as Identity.” Boundary II 23. 2 (1996):111-38.
德里克：“中国历史与东方主义问题”，罗钢、刘象愚主编：《后殖民主义文化理论》。北京：中国社会科学出版社，1999年。72-96。
[Dirlik, Alif. “Chinese History and Question of Orientalism.” Cultural Theories of Post-colonialism. Eds. Luo Gang and Liu Xiangyu. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 1999. 72-96.]
葛兆光：《思想史研究课堂讲录：视野、角度与方法》。北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2005年。
[Ge, Zhaoguang. Classroom Records of Ideological History Studies: Vision, Perspective and Methods. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2005.]
季进，余夏云：“写在主流之外：论周蕾理论批评的边缘论述”，《文艺理论研究》，2（2010）： 9-15。
[Ji, Jin, and Yu Xiayun. “Writing beyond the Mainstream: On Rey Chow’s Marginal Criticisms.” Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2 (2010): 9-15.]
安德鲁·琼斯：《留声中国：摩登音乐文化的形成》，宋伟航译。台北：台湾商务印书馆，2004年。
[Jones, Andrew F.. Recording China: The Making of Modern Musical Culture . Trans. Song Weihang. Taipei: Taiwan Commercial Press, 2004.]
Owen, Stephen. “What is World Poetry: The Anxiety of Global Influence.” The New Republic 19 (1990): 28-32.
Shih, Shu-Mei. Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2007.
Tu, Wei-ming. “Cultural China: The Periphery as the Center.” The Live Tree: The Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today. Ed. Tu Wei-ming. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994. 1-34.
王斑：《全球化阴影下的历史与记忆》。南京：南京大学出版社，2006年。
[Wang, Ban. History and Memory under the Global Shadow. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2006. ]
王德威：“中文写作的越界与回归”，《上海文学》 9（2006）：91-3。
[Wang, David Der-wei. “The Border-crossing and Homecoming of Chinese-Language Writing.” Shanghai Literature 9 (2006): 91-3.]
——：《众声喧哗以后：点评当代中文小说》。台北：麦田出版股份有限公司，2001年。
[---. After Heteroglossia: Comment on Contemporary Chinese-Language Fictions. Taipei: Rye Field Publishing Co., 2001.]
王德威，季进主编：《文学行旅与世界想象》。南京：江苏教育出版社，2007年。
[Wang, David Der-wei, and Ji Jin, eds. Literature’s Travel and World’s Imagination. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House, 2007.]
奚密：“中国式的后现代？——现代汉诗的文化政治”，《中国研究》 9（1998）：1-12。
[Yeh, Michelle. “Chinese Postmodernity? : Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Poetry.” China Studies 9 (1998): 1-12.]
张隆溪：“掷地有声——评葛兆光新著《宅兹中国》”，《开放时代》 7（2011）：137-50。
[Zhang, Longxi. “Extremely Elegant and Valuable: Comment on Ge Zhaoguang’s New Book China as Established Here.” Open Times 7 (2011): 137-50.]
张旭东：《全球化时代的文化认同：西方普遍主义话语的历史批判》。北京：北京大学出版社，2006年。
[Zhang, Xudong. Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization: Universalism and Its Discontents. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005.]
郑文惠，颜健富主编：《革命·启蒙·抒情：中国近现代文学与文化研究学思路》。台北：允晨文化，2011年。
[Zheng, Wenhui, and Yan Jianfu. eds. Revolution, Enlightenment, and Lyricism: Modern Chinese Literature and the Methods of Cultural Study. Taipei: Yunchen Press, 2011.]

[1]	周启星. 从文化研究到文学研究：离散理论的演进、转向及问题 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 91-102.
[2]	熊湘. 王世贞的“文人”身份认同及其意义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(4): 70-80.
[3]	欧阳灿灿. 中国小说的“中国性”管窥：以汪曾祺为例试驳“葛浩文之问” [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(5): 136-143.
[4]	徐诗颖. 二十世纪九十年代以来香港文学文化身份认同研究批判——以本土性与中国性的内在矛盾为核心 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 29-36.
[5]	谢慧英, 周伟薇. 关于“真实”的历史建构与知识者的身份认同——现代小说叙述人称策略的变迁及其思想史意义 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(3): 203-209.
[6]	吴冠军. “永永远远是龙的传人”：新时期“中国性”之构建的一个拉康主义分析 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(1): 121-157.

在全球景观中定位中国——反思海外世界的“中国性”和“华语表述”讨论

A Positioning of China in the Global Space: Reflecting the Overseas Debate on Chineseness and Sinophone

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价