殷商乐钟命名·乐悬概念体系·乐钟观念定位——试论青铜乐钟的三个问题

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 164-171.

殷商乐钟命名·乐悬概念体系·乐钟观念定位——试论青铜乐钟的三个问题

张法

浙江师范大学人文学院

出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2018-01-24
作者简介:张法，浙江师范大学人文学院，主要研究领域：文艺学，美学，思想史。

The Naming of Bronze Bells in the Shang dynasty;The Concept System of Yuexuan; Bronze Bells' Definition:Three Issues about the Bronze Bell

Zhang Fa

the college of Humanities, Zhejiang Normal University (321004 Jinhua, China)

Online:2017-05-25 Published:2018-01-24
About author:Zhang Fa is a professor at the college of Humanities, Zhejiang Normal University (321004 Jinhua, China), his research interest covers literary theory, aesthetics and the study to history of ideas.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 殷商乐钟无自名，被学界主流命名为铙，也有著名学人命名为庸，从青铜乐器由虞夏时代的铜铃到殷商时代的编铙（庸）到西周以后的编钟来看，铙是从铃的角度去看而得出，庸是从钟的角度看而来出，在铃-铙或庸-钟的演进中，庸更能体现殷商乐钟的本质特性。乐悬概念由簨虡、肆堵、宫-轩-判-特组成，三组概念不但每一后者都可包含前者，而且具有从夏到商到周的时代演进意义。青铜乐钟在最初进入以鼓磬为主体的乐器体系时，被定义为阴阳体系中的阴。随着其入主中心，其性质转为阴阳兼有且阴阳互含而灵活圆转。

关键词: 青铜文化, 殷商乐钟命名, 乐悬概念体系, 乐钟观念定位

Abstract: The bronze bell in the Shang Dynasty had no name, which was why it has been called Rao (铙) by many scholars and Rong (庸) by others. From the viewpoint of the evolution of bronze bells, Rao was related more to Ling (铃) in the Xia Dynasty, and later Rao became Rong in the Shang Dynasty and finally Bianzhong (编钟) in the Western Zhou Dynasty. Thus seen, Rong was more akin to the nature of bronze bells. The concept system of Yuexuan (乐悬) consisted of three aspects: sunju (簨虡), sidu (肆堵) and gong-xuan-pante (宫-轩-判-特). The three groups of concepts were not only mutually inclusive but also revealed the evolution from the Xia to the Shang and to the Zhou Dynasty. When the bronze bell was a part of the musical instrument system dominated by Zhong and Qing (钟磬), it represented Yin (阴) in the Yin-Yang system. When it became dominant later, it possessed both qualities of Yin (阴) and Yang (阳).

Key words: the bronze culture, the naming of the bronze bell, the concept system of Yuexun (乐悬), the definition of the bronze bell

张法. 殷商乐钟命名·乐悬概念体系·乐钟观念定位——试论青铜乐钟的三个问题[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 164-171.

Zhang Fa . The Naming of Bronze Bells in the Shang dynasty;The Concept System of Yuexuan; Bronze Bells' Definition:Three Issues about the Bronze Bell[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(3): 164-171.

陈立:《白虎通疏证》。北京:中华书局,1994年。[Chen,Li.Baihutong Exegesis.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1994.]
陈梦家:《西周铜器断代》。北京:中华书局,1999年。[Chen,Mengjia.Periodization of Western Zhou Bronzes.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1999.]
陈奇猷编:《吕氏春秋校释》。上海:学林出版社,1984年。[Chen,Qiyou,ed.Collation and Elucidation of Lü's Springs and Autumns.Shanghai:Xuelin Press,1984.]
陈素红主编:《尉缭子》,《历代兵书集成》(第一卷)。北京:团结出版社,1999年。[Chen,Suhong,ed.Weiliaozi.Collection of Chinese Books on Warfare.Vol.1.Beijing:Unity Press,1999.]
郭沫若:《两周金文辞大系》。北京:科学出版社,2008年。[Guo,Moruo.A General Outline of Bronze Inscriptions of the Western and Eastern Zhou Dynasties.Beijing:Science Press,2008.]
郭璞注:《穆天子传》。北京:中华书局,1985年。[Guo,Pu,ed.Biography of King Mu.Zhonghua Book Company,1985.]
李光地:《古乐经传》。四库全书经部乐类。“瀚堂典藏古籍网”。[Li,Guangdi.The Ancient Yue Jing.Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries.2 April 2017..]
黎翔凤:《管子校注》。北京:中华书局,2004年。[Li,Xiangfeng.Guangzi Exegesis.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,2004.]
李学勤主编:《礼记正义》。北京:北京大学出版社,1999年。[Li,Xueqin,ed.Liji Exegesis.Beijing:Peking University Press,1999.]
---:《尚书正义》。北京:北京大学出版社,1999年。[---.Shangshu Exegesis.Beijing:Peking University Press,1999.]
---:《周礼注疏》。北京:北京大学出版社,1999年。[---.Zhouli Exegesis.Beijing:Peking University Press,1999.]
罗振玉:《贞松堂集古遗文》。北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003年。[Luo,Zhenyu.The Missing Ancient Essays in Zhensongtang.Beijing:Beijing Library Press,2003.]
牛龙菲:《古乐发隐》。兰州:甘肃人民出版社,1985年。[Niu,Longfei.The Origin of Ancient Music.Lanzhou:Gansu People's Publishing House,1985.]
容庚:《商周彝器通考》。上海:上海人民出版社,2008年。[Rong,Geng.A Study of Bronze Vessels in the Shang and Zhou Dynasties.Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House,2008.]
司马迁:《史记》。北京:中华书局,1959年。[Sima,Qian.Records of the Grand Historian.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1959.]
王清雷:《西周乐悬制度的音乐考古学研究》。北京:文物出版社,2007年。[Wang,Qinglei.A Study of Yuexuan System in the Western Zhou Dynasty from the Viewpoint of Music Archaeology.Beijing:Cultural Relics Press,2007.]
王先谦:《荀子集解》。北京:中华书局,1988年。[Wang,Xianqian.Xunzi Exegesis.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1988.]
王友华:“先秦大型编钟组合研究”(博士论文),中国艺术研究院,2009年。[Wang,Youhua.“A Study of Bronze Bells in the Pre-QinPeriod.”Ph.D.thesis.China National Academy of Arts,2009.]
吴毓江:《墨子校注》。北京:中华书局,1993年。[Wu,Yujiang.Mozi Exegesis.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1993.]
许坚等:《初学记》。北京:中华书局,1962年。[Xu,Jian,et al.Materials for Elementary Instruction.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1962.]
许慎:《说文解字注》,段玉裁注。上海:上海古籍出版社,1981年。[Xu,Shen.Analytical Dictionary of Characters with Annotations.Ed.Duan Yucai.Shanghai:Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House,1981.]
张冲:“先秦时期陶铃和铜铃研究”(硕士论文),山东大学,2014年。[Zhang,Chong.“A Study of Pottery Bells and Bronze Bells in the Pre-Qin Period.”MA thesis.Shandong University,2014.]
(1)参李纯一:“庸名探讨”,《音乐研究》1(1988):15-17;陈荃有:“从出土乐器探索商代音乐文化的交流、演变与发展”,《中国音乐学》4(1999):127-41。
(2)参王义华:“先秦大型编钟组合研究”(博士论文,中国艺术研究院,2009)第23-24页“出土远古陶铃表”;张冲:“先秦时期陶铃和铜铃研究”(硕士论文,山东大学,2014)第13页。
(3)引自李圃主编:《古文字诂林》(第十册)(上海:上海教育出版社,2004年)第566页。
(4)引自李圃主编:《古文字诂林》(第六册)(上海:上海教育出版社,2003年)第548-49页。
(5)引自李圃主编:《古文字诂林》(第六册)第549页。
(6)引文见王念孙:《广雅疏正》(北京:中华书局,1983年)第267页。关键在于:由于陶钟最初属铃,钟由铃而来,其语汇影响在后来还有体现:1977年山东沂水刘家店子春秋墓出土9件钮钟上铭有“陈大丧史中高作铃钟”;1978年河南浙川下寺1号墓出土9件钮钟上铭有“自作咏铃”;传世的许子镈、楚王颔钟均铭“自作铃钟”。
(7)《白虎通·礼乐》“笙在北方,柷在东北方,鼓在东方,箫在东南方,琴在南方,埙在西南方,钟在西方,磬在西北方”。