欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 48-57.

• 现当代文论与批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

小民族文学:重述历史的边界与越界  

李长中   

  1. 阜阳师范学院文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-11-11
  • 作者简介:李长中,文学博士,阜阳师范学院文学院教授,硕士生导师,主要从事当代文学(少数民族文学)理论与批评研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系2016年度国家社科基金项目“当代少数民族文学批评的‘西方话语’与‘本土经验’研究”[项目编号:16FZW055],教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“文艺评论价值体系的理论建设与实践研究”[编号:15JZD039],安徽省教育厅重点研究项目[编号:SK2013A137]的阶段性成果。

Literature of Small Nationalities: Rewriting History, Boundary and Transgression

Li Changzhong   

  1. the School of Liberal Arts of Fuyang Normal University (Fuyang 236037, China)
  • Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-11-11
  • About author:Li Changzhong, Ph.D., is a professor in the School of Liberal Arts of Fuyang Normal University (Fuyang 236037, China), with research interest in contemporary minority literature and theory.

摘要: 传统与现代的面叙,本土与全球的相遇,使得“重述历史”成为当下小民族文学①最为凸显的叙事症候。以重述历史召唤族群记忆,以族群记忆强化边界意识与身份再生产,是重述历史的基本诉求,这里的“历史”并不是文字书写的、可资验证的“大历史”,而是一种叙事与阐释的“传统”,是文本建构或赋形的“过去”。由于“自我—他者”空间维度的缺席,“传统—现在”的单一时间维度,使得“重述历史”溢出了文学/伦理的边界。以“流动的传统/历史”为基本叙事伦理与族际交往原则,超越二元对立思维的仲裁,重述历史才能走出既有叙事的偏至或极端。

关键词: 小民族, 重述历史, 流动的传统/历史

Abstract: The encounters of tradition and modernity, the local and the global make rewriting history a prominent narrative syndrome of literature of small nationalities. It is rewriting history’s basic appeal to summon collective memory and subsequently to reinforce an awareness of boundary and reproduction of identity with it. History in this sense is not a grand history written to be verified, but a narrative and hermeneutic tradition, a past constructed and molded by texts. Because of the absence of self-other spatial dimension, the single temporal dimension of tradition-modernity makes rewriting history penetrate the boundary of literature and ethics. Rewriting history can only exit from existing predicament by adopting "fluid tradition/history" as the principle of narration and inter-ethnic communication, and by dispensing with the binary mindset.

Key words: small nationalities, rewriting history, fluid tradition/history