欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 173-182.

• 美学与文化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

游戏冲动何以在时间中扬弃时间?——论席勒美学思想中的时间性问题之二

刘彦顺   

  1. 浙江师范大学人文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-11-11
  • 作者简介:刘彦顺,浙江师范大学人文学院教授,文学博士,主要从事美学、美育理论及现象学美学中的时间性问题研究。

Game Impulse's Negation of Time in Time: Temporality in Schiller's Aesthetics (II)

Liu Yanshun   

  1. the School of Humanities, Zhejiang Normal University (Jinhua 321004, China)
  • Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-11-11
  • About author:Liu Yanshun, Ph.D., is a professor at the School of Humanities, Zhejiang Normal University (Jinhua 321004, China). His major areas of academic specialty include aesthetics, theories about aesthetic education, and temporality in phenomenology.

摘要: 本文认为,“时间性”是席勒的美育思想与美学思想中最为关键的机杼之一,也是亟待揭示的隐秘之所在。席勒认为,要从构成状态上对感性冲动与理性冲动之间最为根本的区别进行清晰的描述,就必须依据“时间性”,前者作为促迫的时间性不可能具有深远之未来前景,而后者作为科学之原理、伦理之规范、宗教之神祗则会扬弃时间;且时间性绝不是一个独立于两种冲动之外的第三方标准,而是两种冲动自身原发性的呈显状态。只有在游戏冲动之中,才能使理性在感性活动之中开启、兴发出来,并持守于游戏活动之中。席勒的“活的形象”思想则是侧重对审美活动进行内时间意识构成维度的“流畅”特性分析,由此出发,席勒奠定了美育思想的坚实基础。

关键词:

Abstract: Temporality is the key to Schiller's aesthetics and aesthetic education, which should be elucidated. Schiller believes that temporality must be followed in order to give a clear account of the fundamental differences between the perceptual impulse and the rational impulse in terms of their composition. He argues that the game impulse, which is of narrow temporality, cannot have far foresight, that the rational impulse as maxims, ethical norms and religious gods can negate time, and that temporality is by no means a tertiary criterion independent of the other two impulses. Only in the game impulse can rationality be activated and developed in perceptual activities and maintained in games. Schiller's thought on the "living image" is mainly an analysis of the "flow" of the inner time-conscious dimensions of aesthetic activities. This thought is the foundation for Schiller's aesthetic education.

Key words: