海德格尔的思想转向与存在追问的结构

文艺理论研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 180-185.

海德格尔的思想转向与存在追问的结构

张云鹏

中国计量大学人文社科学院

出版日期:2016-09-25 发布日期:2017-09-30
作者简介:张云鹏，中国计量大学人文社科学院教授，研究方向为现象学美学。
基金资助:
本文为国家社科基金项目“杜夫海纳审美知觉现象学之现象学阐释”[项目编号：15BZX125]的阶段性成果。

The Turn of Heidegger's Thought and the Structure of His Inquiries into the Problem of Being

Zhang Yunpeng

the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, China Jiliang University (Hangzhou 310018, China)

Online:2016-09-25 Published:2017-09-30
About author:Zhang Yunpeng is a professor at the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, China Jiliang University (Hangzhou 310018,China). His main research field is phenomenological aesthetics.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在追问存在的道路上，海德格尔的思想前后期有明显变化。如何理解这种变化？海德格尔本人以及学术界存在着各种不同的观点。从结构的角度看，所谓思想“转向”，其实质是追问存在结构模式的转变。《存在与时间》时期是二重结构模式，即“此在——存在”；从此在转向存在本身，就是由二重结构模式转向了一重结构模式，即“存在”，这是纯思的路向；与此并行的诗的路向所走的则是由二重结构模式转向了三重结构模式，即“此—在—存在者—存在”。其结构中的“存在者”特指审美对象，包含了艺术作品、诗、作为原诗的语言以及物化之物。而“此–在”大不同于“此在”，其主要区别在于，此在重在为自身的“为何之故”而在“此”，而“此–在”却是为存在的“为何之故”而在“此”，这就是海德格尔守护存在、应合存在的本意。

关键词: 海德格尔, 存在论, 结构模式

Abstract: In his inquiries into the problem of Being, there was an obvious shift between the earlier and later periods of Heidegger's thought. Heidegger himself and the academia have different opinions on the shift in question. From the perspective of structure, the so-called "turn" of thought was essentially the transformation of the structural pattern of his inquiries. The period of Being and Time belonged to the pattern of the binary structure of "Dasein (being-there) to being"; when shifting from Dasein (being-there) to Being per se, the binary structure was turned into a unitary structure, that is "Being", which was an orientation of pure thinking. The orientation of poetry which paralleled the foregoing turns was the transformation from the binary to trinary structure, that is "Dasein (being-there) to - beings - Being". The "Beings" in the structure hereof particularly referred to aesthetic object, including artistic works, poetry, languages (as the origin of poetry), and objects of materialization. However, "Da-sein" was quite different from "Dasein (being-there)". The main distinction was that "being-there" was concerned much more about Dasein itself, which was the "for the sake of (um...zu)" to be "there", while "Da-sein" was "there" focusing on "the cause of which (um...zu)" for the sake of Being. It was exactly the original idea of Heidegger that Da-sein was the guardian of Being and responded to the calling of Being.

Key words: Heidegger, ontology, structural pattern

张云鹏. 海德格尔的思想转向与存在追问的结构[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(5): 180-185.

Zhang Yunpeng. The Turn of Heidegger's Thought and the Structure of His Inquiries into the Problem of Being[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2016, 36(5): 180-185.

阿兰·布托:《海德格尔》,吕一民译。北京:商务印书馆,1996年。[Alain,Boutot.Heidegger.Trans.Lil Yimin.Beijing:The Commercial Press,1996.]
陈嘉映:《海德格尔哲学概论》。北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1995年。[Chen,Jiaying.An Introduction to Heidegger's Philosophy.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company,1995.]
马丁·海德格尔:《存在与时间》,陈嘉映、王庆节译。北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999年。[Heidegger,Martin.Being and Time.Trans.Chen Jiaying and Wang Qingjie.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company,1999.]
——:《海德格尔选集下卷》,孙周兴选编,孙周兴等译。上海:上海三联书店,1996年。[——.Selected Works of Heidegger,Vol.2.Ed.Sun Zhouxing.Trans.Sun Zhouxing,et al.Shanghai:Shanghai Joint Publishing Press,1996.]
——:《哲学论稿》,孙周兴译。北京:商务印书馆,2012年。[——.Philosophy Papers.Trans.Sun Zhouxing.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2012.]
——:《路标》,孙周兴译。北京:商务印书馆,2000年。[——.Road Sign.Trans.Sun Zhouxing.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2000.]
——:《现象学之基本问题》,丁耘译。上海:上海译文出版社,2008年。[——.The Essential Issues of Phenomenology.Trans.Ding Yun.Shanghai:Shanghai Translation Publishing House,2008.]
——:《形而上学导论》,熊伟、王庆节译。北京:商务印书馆,2005年。[——.The Introduction of Metaphysics.Trans.Xiong Wei and Wang Qingjie.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2005.]
埃德蒙德·胡塞尔:《纯粹现象学通论》,李幼蒸译。北京:商务印书馆,1992年。[Husserl,Edmund.A General Theory of Pure Phenomenology.Trans.Li Youzheng.Beijing:The Commercial Press,1992.]
——:《欧洲科学的危机与超越论的现象学》,王炳文译。北京:商务印书馆,2001年。[——.The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology.Trans.Wang Bingwen.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2001.]
莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂:《可见的与不可见的》,罗国祥译。北京:商务印书馆,2008年。[Merleau-Ponty,Maurice.The Visible and the Invisible.Trans.Luo Guoxiang.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2008.]
理查德·波尔特:《存在的急迫》,张志和译。上海:上海书店出版社,2009年。[Polt,Richard.The Emergency of Being on Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy.Trans.Zhang Zhihe.Shanghai:Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House,2009.]
乔治·斯坦纳:《海德格尔》,李河、刘继译。杭州:浙江大学出版社,2012年。[Steiner,George.Martin Heidegger.Trans.Li He and Liu Ji.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press,2012.]
孙周兴:《语言存在论》。北京:商务印书馆,2011年。[Sun,Zhouxing.The Ontology of Language.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2011.]
叶秀山:《思·史·诗》。北京:人民出版社,1988年。[Ye,Xiushan.Thought,History,Poetry.Beijing:People's Publishing House,1988.]
张祥龙:《海德格尔思想与中国天道》。北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996年。[Zhang,Xianglong.The Thought of Heidegger and Natural Law of China.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company,1996.]
张柯:《道路之思》。南京:江苏人民出版社,2012年。[Zhang,Ke.Thinking of the Road.Nanjing:Jiangsu People's Publishing House,2012.]

[1]	单小曦. 存在即媒介——海德格尔的媒介存在论及其诗学效应 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 13-26.
[2]	曾繁仁, 任群. 试论谢林的存在论美学思想 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 21-30.
[3]	孟令兵. 关于王维“禅境诗”诸特征之跨文化比较研究——基于王维、松尾芭蕉及海德格尔诗作的对比分析而论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(2): 194-204.
[4]	丰雅鑫. 从“真理”到“地方”——论海德格尔艺术思想的“转向” [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(3): 157-165.
[5]	张振华. 诗歌与民族共同体的生成与维系——海德格尔第一次荷尔德林讲课的核心问题与思路 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(3): 197-.
[6]	宋聪聪. 让艺术为历史建基——论海德格尔艺术批评的历史维度 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(2): 189-198.
[7]	娄林. 荷尔德林和德意志的命运 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(1): 131-137.
[8]	缪羽龙. 现成品与真理的摆置 ——对杜尚《泉》的海德格尔式解读 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(5): 43-49.
[9]	孙丽君. 伽达默尔晚期思想中的精神能量与图像 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(3): 193-200.
[10]	肖建华 . “审美无区分”思想批判——兼谈对前期伽达默尔美学的反思和超越问题 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(3): 201-208.
[11]	汪正龙. 艺术与物性——对一个海德格尔引发的争论的考察 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(1): 170-176.
[12]	赵奎英. 诗人天职与生态伦理——海德格尔《诗人何为》重读 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 141-148.
[13]	弗里德里克·詹姆逊, 朱羽. 论海德格尔 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(5): 4-20.
[14]	单小曦. 媒介存在论——新媒介文艺研究的哲学基础 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(2): 178-191.
[15]	刘旭光. 现象学的方法与当代文艺美学的新发展 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2012, 32(3): 84-89.