欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 183-192.

• 西方文论与美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“后理论”时代的“文学性”话语反思——兼论元叙事的弥散与本质主义诗学的理论困境

李艳丰
  

  1. 华南师范大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2017-09-22
  • 作者简介:李艳丰，文学博士，华南师范大学文学院副教授，山东大学文学与新闻传播学院博士后。主要从事文艺学、文化研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为中国博士后基金第57批面上项目“理论反思与批评实践：文艺意识形态批评的文化政治维度”阶段性成果[基金编号：2015M570579]，广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目“从审美意识形态论到文化政治诗学”阶段性成果[项目编号：GD14CZW05]。

Reflections on the Literariness in the Post-Theoretic Era: The Dispersion of Meta-Narration and the Plight of Essentialist Poetics

Li Yanfeng   

  1. the College of Literature, South China Normal University (Guangzhou 510000, China)
  • Online:2016-01-25 Published:2017-09-22
  • About author:Li Yanfeng, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the College of Literature, South China Normal University (Guangzhou 510000, China), and a post-doctoral fellow in the College of Literature and News Communication, Shandong University, with academic interests in the theory of literature and art, and cultural studies.

PDF (PC)

96

摘要： 随着现代性的断裂与“元叙事”的弥散，本质主义思维范式日渐陷入知识表述的危机，“大理论”的历史走向终结，“后理论”时代莅临。作为一种新的话语范式与知识图景，“后理论”倡导以反本质主义、非中心化、多元化、历史化的知识立场来重构理论的合法性效度，反对固守本质主义、逻各斯中心、总体性与同一性逻辑。面对“后理论”时代的到来，本质主义“文学性”话语范式与本质主义诗学开始面临知识“合法性”的拷问。文章在批判性反思与重构“文学性”话语的同时，亦对“后理论”时代文学理论的发展作出了预期与展望。

关键词: “后理论”, “文学性”, 元叙事, 本质主义, 诗学

Abstract: In the context of the dispersion of meta-narrative and the break-up in modernity, the paradigm of essentialist thinking faces the increasing crisis of representation of knowledge. The history of "big theory" is coming to an end, and the "post-theory" emerges as a new paradigm of discourse and system of knowledge. Post-theory takes on an anti-essentialist, non-centralist, pluralistic and historized standpoint of knowledge to reconstruct the validity of legitimacy, opposing rigid essentialism, logocentrism and the logic of totality and identification. With the advent of post-theory, the discourse paradigm of essentialist literariness and the essentialist poetics are faced with the question over the legitimacy of knowledge. This paper aims at a reflective critique of the discourse of literariness and attempts to anticipate some possible developments of literary theory in the era of post-theory.

Key words: post-theory, literariness, meta-narrative, essentialism, poetics