融通创新：构建面向未来的新诗美学——兼谈传统诗论与现代诗论的关系

文艺理论研究

融通创新：构建面向未来的新诗美学——兼谈传统诗论与现代诗论的关系

张吕坤，韦施伊

华东师范大学中文系

出版日期:2017-11-25 发布日期:2017-10-18
作者简介:张吕坤，华东师范大学中文系博士生，文艺学专业，学术兴趣主要集中在中西文论比较、中国现代文论研究。韦施伊，华东师范大学中文系博士生，文艺学专业，学术兴趣主要集中在西方文论研究、文化研究。

Integration and Innovation: the Construction of the Aesthetics of Poetry for the Future, also on the Relationship between Traditional Poetics and Modern Poetics

Zhang Lvkun, Wei Shiyi

the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University (Shanghai)

Online:2017-11-25 Published:2017-10-18
About author:Zhang Lvkun is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University (Shanghai). His research interests are comparative studies of Chinese and Western literary criticism and Chinese literary theory. Wei Shiyi is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University (Shanghai). Her research interests are Western literary theory and culture studies.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新诗发展已逾百年，这一个百年是中国社会形态、文化症候发生重大改变的百年。以继承传统和反叛传统为主线的新诗发展，不管它如何承担物态化的社会重任或者受西方文化影响表现出“现代性”，实则是在构建新“传统”的范畴之下。新诗及其诗论以具体的创作实践获得合法性来源，并且它们的实践活动基于融通的视野和开阔的时代语境。这样的历史语境亦是新诗、诗论所要面临的机遇与挑战。融通创新乃至建立一个博大的理论胸怀是构建面向未来的新诗美学的主要特征，它在兼有历史纵深、跨文化、未来性的情况下，给予新诗足够的理论支撑。

关键词: 融通, 跨文化, 语境, 新诗论, 传统

Abstract: Modern poetry has a history of more than one hundred years, during which period China's social form and cultural symptoms have undergone significant changes. Centering on the inheritance and rebellion of traditions, the development of modern poetry is essentially categorized within the construction of new "tradition", no matter how it assumes social responsibilities of materialization, or turns into "modernity" affected by Western cultures. It is expected that modern poetry and poetics get their legitimacy through practice in the real world situation, on the basis of an integrative vision and an open historical context of the era which brings opportunities as well as challenges. In this respect, the construction of the aesthetics of modern poetry for the future lies in integration, innovation, and a broad theoretical mind, which can provide strong theoretical support in the context of historical depth, cross-culture, and futurity.

Key words: integration, cross-cultural, context, new poetics, tradition

张吕坤, 韦施伊. 融通创新：构建面向未来的新诗美学——兼谈传统诗论与现代诗论的关系[J]. 文艺理论研究.

Zhang Lvkun, Wei Shiyi . Integration and Innovation: the Construction of the Aesthetics of Poetry for the Future, also on the Relationship between Traditional Poetics and Modern Poetics[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art.

[1]郭绍虞:《沧浪诗话校释》。北京:人民文学出版社, 1983年。[Guo, Shaoyu.Proofreading and Interpretation of Canglang Shihua.Beijing:People’s Literature Publishing House, 1983.] [2]郭湛波:“再版自序”, 《近五十年中国思想史》。长沙:岳麓书社, 2013年。[Guo, Zhanbo.“Reprint Preface.”The Chinese Intellectual History in Recent 50 Years.Changsha:Yuelu Press, 2013.] [3]李怡:《中国现代新诗与古典诗歌传统》。北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2015年。[Li, Yi.Modern Chinese Poetry and Classical Poetry Tradition.Beijing:China Renmin University Press, 2015.] [4]梁启超:《饮冰室文集 (之七) 》。北京:中华书局, 1989年。[Liang, Qichao.Yin Bing Shi Collections.Vol.7.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 1989.] [5]穆木天:“谭诗---寄郭沫若的一封信”, 《创造月刊·第一卷》1 (1926) 。[Mu, Mutian.“Talking about Poetry:A Letter to Guo Moruo.”The Creation Monthly.Vol.1.1 (1926) .] [6]钱钟书:“中国诗与中国画”, 《钱钟书作品集》。兰州:敦煌文艺出版社, 1997年。500-501。[Qian, Zhongshu.“Chinese Poetry and Chinese Painting.”Collection of Qian Zhongshu’s Works.Lanzhou:Dunhuang Literature and Arts Press, 1997.500-501.] [7]T.S.艾略特:“荒原”, 《英国现代诗选》, 查良铮译。长沙:湖南人民出版社, 1985年。46-97。[Eliot, T.S.“The Waste Land.”Anthology of British Modern Poetry.Trans.Zha Liangzheng.Changsha:Hunan People’s Publishing House, 1985.46-97.] [8]王富仁:“对一种研究模式的置疑”, 《佛山大学学报》1 (1996) :8-14。[Wang, Furen.“On a Questionable Research Model.”Journal of Foshan University 1 (1996) :8-14.] [9]王国维:《王国维文学美学论著集》。太原:北岳文艺出版社, 1987年。[Wang, Guowei.Collection of Wang Guowei’s Literary Aesthetics.Taiyuan:Beiyue Literature and Arts Press, 1987.] [10]乐黛云李比维 (Alain Le Pichon) 主编:《跨文化对话 (1) 》。上海:上海文化出版社, 1998年。[Yue, Daiyun, and Alain Le Pichon, eds.Dialogue Transcultural.Vol 1.Shanghai:Shanghai Culture Publishing House, 1998.] [11]殷国明:“结语:有容乃大---关于20世纪中国文艺理论创新空间的拓展”, 《空间的扩展---从比较文学到跨文化研究》。上海:上海文艺出版社, 2015年。[Yin, Guoming.“Conclusion:Broad-minded Brings Greatness-On the Expansion of Innovation Space of Chinese Literary Theory in the 20th Century.”Expansion of Space:From Comparative Literature to Cross-cultural Studies.Shanghai:Shanghai Literature and Arts Press, 2015.] [12]杨天石:《黄遵宪》。上海:上海人民出版社, 1979年。[Yang, Tianshi.Huang Zunxian.Shanghai:Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1979.] [13]赵瑞蕻:《鲁迅〈摩罗诗力说〉注释·今译·解说》。天津:天津人民出版社, 1982年。[Zhao, Ruihong.Notes·Present Translation·Interpretation:Lu Xun’s On the Power of the Satanical School of Poetry.Tianjin:Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 1982.] [14]周振甫:“时序四十五”, 《文心雕龙今译》。北京:中华书局, 2007年。[Zhou, Zhenfu.“Timing Forty-five.”Present Translation of Wen Xin Diao Long.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 2007.]

[1]	李庆本. 比较文学的中国范式 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(2): 13-23.
[2]	何诗海. 古代文体学理论研究的现代进程 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(2): 34-44.
[3]	冯毓云, 周丽明. 语境的创新机制——以瑞恰慈和卡勒为中心的考察 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(2): 172-181.
[4]	李凤亮, 周梦琛. 数字文化产业视野下的传统文化创新 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 12-19.
[5]	江守义. 叙事学对话与“中国声音”——1997年以来国内叙事学研究的回顾与反思 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 122-132.
[6]	陈建森, 陈颖姮. “说书场交流语境”与宋元话本的文本形式 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(6): 153-164.
[7]	吴文庆. 子学谱系中的“说部”建构 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(5): 171-180.
[8]	夏中义. 释“神韵”：钱锺书的诗贵清远说——古典今释的地缘语境 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 1-10.
[9]	叶晔, 杜欢. 论文书牍与明代文学论争的“境内”驱动 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(6): 160-171.
[10]	王悦. 过渡与协调：十八世纪英国小说中的不可靠叙述 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(4): 145-153.
[11]	鲁本·菲泽迈尔. 作为障碍的理解：跨文化研究中的操习视角 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(2): 9-24.
[12]	刘耘华. 中国绘画的跨文化观看——以弗朗索瓦·朱利安的中国画论研究为个案 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(2): 34-45.
[13]	高旭东, 石统文. “五四”与传统：激烈反叛背后的承担 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(1): 59-68.
[14]	唐芸芸. 清代“唐宋诗之争”二元对立的消解及自反性特征 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(5): 121-131.
[15]	陈剑晖. 论中国散文的抒情传统 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(4): 1-9.