“永永远远是龙的传人”：新时期“中国性”之构建的一个拉康主义分析

文艺理论研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 121-157.

“永永远远是龙的传人”：新时期“中国性”之构建的一个拉康主义分析

吴冠军

华东师范大学政治学系

出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-03-11
作者简介:吴冠军，华东师范大学政治学系教授，研究领域包括激进左翼政治哲学、拉康主义精神分析。近作包括《现时代的群学》、《爱与死的幽灵学》、《多元的现代性》等。
基金资助:
本文写作得到国家社会科学基金项目（13CZX059）与上海浦江人才计划（12PJC036）的资助。

"Descendants of a Blurry-Eyed Dragon": A Lacanian Analysis of the Post-Maoist Structuration of Chineseness

Wu Guanjun

the Department of Politics at East China Normal University (Shanghai 200241, China)

Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-03-11
About author:Wu Guanjun is a professor of political theory in the Department of Politics at East China Normal University (Shanghai 200241, China). His books include Dao and Mores, The Philosophy of Living Together, The Hauntology of Love and Death, The Perverse Core of Reality, and Multiple Modernity, among others.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 自八十年代初以来，在汉语地区《龙的传人》是一首家喻户晓的流行歌曲。作者认为，它已成为了中国大陆“新时期”以来“中国性”建构的一个代表性文本。借用拉康与齐泽克所提供的理论工具，这篇论文从对这首歌曲的一个细致的文本分析与精神分析出发，进而对“中国性”之当代建构展开一个批判性的探讨。

关键词: 中国性, 拉康主义精神分析, 齐泽克, 巨龙幻想

Abstract: "Descendants of the Dragon" (Long de chuanren) has become one of the most popular songs within the Sinophone world since the early 1980s. It can be, however, also regarded as one of the representative texts through which one can indeed glimpse the profound construction of Chineseness in the post-Maoist mainland China. Utilizing theoretical tools provided by Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, this paper offers detailed textual analyses as well as psycho-analyses of "Descendants of the Dragon", with the goal of furthering the contemporary critical examination of Chineseness.

Key words: Chineseness, Lacanian psychoanalysis, ?i?ek, the Great Dragon fantasy

吴冠军. “永永远远是龙的传人”：新时期“中国性”之构建的一个拉康主义分析[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(1): 121-157.

Wu Guanjun. "Descendants of a Blurry-Eyed Dragon": A Lacanian Analysis of the Post-Maoist Structuration of Chineseness[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(1): 121-157.

Ames, Roger and David Hall. A Philosophical Translation of Dao De Jing. New York: Ballantine Books, 2003.
Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj ?i?ek. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London; New York: Verso, 2000.
Chun, Allen. “Fuck Chineseness: On the Ambiguities of Ethnicity as Culture as Identity.” Boundary 2 23. 2 (1996).
Davies, Gloria. Worrying About China: the Language of Chinese Critical Inquiry. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.
Deng, Yong and Wang Fei-Ling, eds. In The Eyes of The Dragon: China Views the World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1999.
Duan, Baolin. “There is no doubt that we are decedents of the Dragon” (in Chinese). Chinese Culture Research 1 (2002): 125-30.
Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London; New York: Routledge, 1996.
Fink, Bruce. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995.
- - -. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
- - -. Lacan to the Letter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.
Gan, Yang. Civilization, Nation, University (in Chinese). Beijing: Joint Publishing House, 2012.
Gries, Peter Hays. China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.
Homer, Sean. Jacques Lacan. London; New York: Routledge, 2005.
Jullien, Franc?ois. The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China. Trans. Janet Lloyd, New York: Zone Books, 1995.
Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977.
- - -. On Feminine Sexuality. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton, 1999.
- - -. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992.
Levy-Stokes, Carmela. “Jouissance.” A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Eds. H. Glowinski, Z. Marks, and S. Murphy. London; New York: Free Association Books, 2001.
Liu, Zaifu. “Talking about 1980s’” (in Chinese). 18 May 2006.
Pye, Lucian W. “How China’s Nationalism Was Shanghaied.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 29 (January 1993).
Stravrakakis, Yannie. Lacan and the Political. London; New York: Routledge, 1999.
Tang, Hua and Chen Lian. “A ‘Descendant of the Dragon’ Returns to the Homeland of the Dragon.” (in Chinese) Liaowang (Outlook Weekly) 5 (1983).
Wang, Hui. No Place to Hesitate: “May Fourth” and Its Echo (in Chinese). Zhejiang: Zhejiang Literature and Art publishing House, 1994.
- - -. Reviewing the Quenched Fire (in Chinese). Beijing: People Literature Publishing House, 2000.
Xu, Jilin. “The Fate of an Enlightenment: Twenty Years in the Chinese Intellectual Sphere (1978-98).” East Asian History 20 (2000). Trans. Geremie R. Barme and Gloria Davies.
Xu, Youyu. “Talking about the 1980s: In Conversation with Li Gongming” (in Chinese). 18 May 2006.
Zhang, Xudong. The Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization (in Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005.
Zhou, Guoping. Nietzsche, in the Intersection of the Centuries (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1986.
?i?ek, Slavoj. How to Read Lacan. London: Granta, 2006.
- - -. “In His Bold Gaze My Ruin Is Writ Large.” Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Lacan. Ed. ?i?ek. London; New York: Verso, 1992.
- - -. Interrogating the Real. London; New York: Continuum. 2005.
- - -. Looking Awry. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: MIT Press, 1991.
- - -. On Belief. London; New York: Routledge, 2001.
- - -. Tarrying with the Negative. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993.
- - -. The Fragile Absolute, or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? London; New York: Verso, 2000.
- - -. The Indivisible Remainder. London; New York: Verso, 1996.
- - -. The Metastases of Enjoyment. London; New York: Verso, 1994.
- - -. “The Seven Veils of Fantasy.” Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Ed. Dany Nobus. London: Rebus Press, 1998.
- - -. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London; New York: Verso, 1989.
- - -. The Ticklish Subject. London; New York: Verso, 1999a.
- - -. The ?i?ek Reader. Oxford, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1999b.

[1]	刘昕亭. 后人类话语反思 ——以齐泽克为中心 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(6): 184-191.
[2]	欧阳灿灿. 中国小说的“中国性”管窥：以汪曾祺为例试驳“葛浩文之问” [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(5): 136-143.
[3]	肖炜静. “空能指”的政治之维：从列维-斯特劳斯到齐泽克 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(2): 206-216.
[4]	戴宇辰. “上帝死了，一切都不被允许”：齐泽克的赛博空间批判 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(5): 198-208.
[5]	尉光吉 . 停留在表面：齐泽克的屏幕理论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(5): 172-179.
[6]	徐诗颖. 二十世纪九十年代以来香港文学文化身份认同研究批判——以本土性与中国性的内在矛盾为核心 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(3): 29-36.
[7]	刘昕亭. 齐泽克与当代西方文论的再政治化 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 35(4): 119-129.
[8]	余夏云. 在全球景观中定位中国——反思海外世界的“中国性”和“华语表述”讨论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(1): 46-52.