欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 13-20.

• 当下学科建设研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“文艺心理学”的命名之难——新时期以来“文学的跨学科研究”学术考察之一

刘锋杰   

  1. 苏州大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2012-09-25 发布日期:2012-10-08
  • 作者简介:刘锋杰，苏州大学文学院教授，博士生导师，主要从事文学基本理论、中国现代文论史研究。

The Name and Nature of the Psychology of Art: An Exploration of Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature since 1976

Liu Fengjie   

  1. Soochow Univeristy (Suzhou)
  • Online:2012-09-25 Published:2012-10-08
  • About author:Liu Fengjie is a professor at Soochow Univeristy (Suzhou), and his research interests cover literary theory and the history of literary criticism of modern China.

PDF (PC)

88

摘要： 中国文艺心理学的跨学科研究经历了三个阶段的命名探索，包含了是从心理学出发还是从文艺学出发的两难选择，形成两条研究途径：从心理学出发，是将文艺与心理关系作为心理现象来研究；从文艺学出发，是将文艺与心理关系作为文学现象来研究。我们认为，应将文艺心理学命名为研究“文艺心理”的学科，为其确定独特的研究对象，充分重视心理学介入文艺研究的有限性，在文艺学与心理学的视界融合中建立研究方法，才能建构更为明晰的文艺心理学的学科体系。

关键词: 文艺心理学, 跨学科, 命名, 视界融合

Abstract: The disciplinary formation of psychology of art in China experienced three phases in terms of its name and nature, and two approaches have emerged with one from the psychological perspective and the other from literary perspective. The psychological perspective takes the relation between psychology and literary art as a psychological phenomenon, while the literary perspective takes it as a literary one. This paper tries to argue for a discipline to study the psychology of literary art and establish a subject boundary of the discipline. It argues that the limits of psychology in literary studies has to be recognized and that only when an approach is established in the fusion between the horizons of literature and psychology can the disciplinary boundary of psychology of literature and art be clearly defined.

Key words: psychology of literature and art, interdisciplinary, naming, fusion of horizons