欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》，
文艺理论研究

文艺理论研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 138-146.

• 现当代文论与批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

美之社会性：批判中的重建——从朱光潜对克罗齐的“误读”谈起

金浪   

  1. 重庆大学人文社会科学高等研究院
  • 出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-06-17
  • 作者简介:金浪，重庆大学人文社会科学高等研究院讲师、师资研究员，主要从事美学、文艺理论与批评方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文乃重庆市社科规划培育项目《抗战时期朱光潜美学“转向”研究》[项目编号：2013PYZW10]的阶段性成果之一，并受中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。

The Sociality of the Aesthetic and the Reconstruction in Critique: From Zhu Guangqian's "Misreading" of Croce

Jin Lang   

  1. the Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Chongqing University (Chongqing 400044, China)
  • Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-06-17
  • About author:Jin Lang is an assistant professor in the Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Chongqing University (Chongqing 400044, China), with research interests in aesthetics, literary theories and criticism.

PDF (PC)

83

摘要： 本文旨在通过分析朱光潜对克罗齐的接受来探讨其美学中的社会性构建问题。在对朱光潜接受克罗齐的研究中，“误读”几成定论，但仅仅着眼于“误读”却未免遮蔽了朱光潜自身的美学构建。通过在“辨物”与“析情”中重回康德起点，朱光潜的批判不仅指向克罗齐，而且还上升至整个唯心主义哲学传统，深藏其后的乃是他对美之社会性问题的持续关注。这一关注发端于对克罗齐“传达”问题的批判，并在“物”的设置中实现了英国经验主义同情说与德国移情论美学两大传统的互补，从而为其情感论美学构建提供了理论依据。

关键词: 朱光潜, 克罗齐, 美学, 误读, 社会性

Abstract: This paper investigates the construction of sociality in Zhu Guangqian's aesthetics by analyzing his acceptance of Croce. Misreading is almost a consensus in the studies of Zhu Guangqian's acceptance of Croce, while this might also overshadow his aesthetics construction. When returning to Kant as his point of re-departure, Zhu Guangqian not only directed his critique toward Croce but also the western tradition of idealist philosophy in general, and it is his continuous concern of the sociality of the aesthetic that lies behind his critique. This concern of his starts with his critique of Croce's aesthetics and is realized when he complimented British empirical sympathy and the tradition of German empathy aesthetics.

Key words: Zhu Guangqian, Croce, aesthetics, misreading, sociality