王又朴的古文批评及其价值

文艺理论研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 41-49.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇下一篇

王又朴的古文批评及其价值

余祖坤

华中师范大学文学院

出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-06-17
作者简介:余祖坤，文学博士，华中师范大学文学院副教授，湖北文学理论与批评研究中心副研究员，主要从事中国古代散文及其理论研究。
基金资助:
本文为国家社会科学基金青年项目“中国古代文法概念范畴研究”[项目编号：13CZW020]的阶段性成果。

On Wang Youpu's Criticism on the Ancient-Style Prose and Its Value

Yu Zukun

the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Central China Normal University (Wuhan 430079, China)

Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-06-17
About author:Yu Zukun is an associate professor at the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Central China Normal University (Wuhan 430079, China) with main research interests in Chinese ancient prose and its theory.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 古文批评是桐城派文学活动的重要组成部分，对于深入理解其古文理论具有重要意义，理应引起足够的重视。方苞的弟子王又朴就是一位对桐城派古文理论的发展作出重要贡献的古文批评家。他以方苞的义法说作为其古文批评的理论基础，紧紧抓住义和法之间的关系，所以能够透过人们习焉不察的文字和细节，发现一般读者容易忽略的深隐之意。王又朴在贯彻义法说的同时，又有意识地借鉴了金圣叹文学批评的眼光和经验。这不仅使他对文法具有极其敏锐的感受能力和分析能力，善于揣摩所评书中人物的内心活动以及作者隐含在笔墨之中的幽微心理，而且使他的批评文字充满激情，显示出鲜明的个性和文学色彩。王又朴的古文批评，揭示了《孟子》和《史记》的很多义理，有助于深化人们对此二书的理解；其批评方法和批评特色，对当代学者的古文研究乃至文学批评方式的改进，都有丰富的借鉴意义。

关键词: 王又朴, 桐城派, 古文批评, 学术价值, 方法论意义

Abstract: Critical practice on the ancient-style prose is an important part of the literary activity of Tongcheng School in the Qing Dynasty, and due research attention should be paid for understanding their prose theory. Wang You-pu (1681-1760) was one key figure in developing the school's prose theory. As a disciple of Fang Bao, the founder of the school, Wang developed Fang's notion of yifa (meaning-method) by expanding on the relationship between meaning (yi) and method (fa). Wang You-pu had also combined Fang's notion of meaning-method with Jin Shengtan's (1608-61) literary critical practice and vision, which not only sharpened his perceptive and analytical capacities concerning the meaning and method and provided better perspectives for him to probe into the author's mentality and psychology but also enabled him to take on extra passion, distinct personality and exceptional literariness in his critical writing. Wang You-pu's prose criticism revealed much about the meaning-method in the works of Mencius and Records of the Grand Historian, which could help to deepen the understanding of the two books. His critical approach and practice are valuable for contemporary research in the classical studies and literary theory.

Key words: Wang Youpu, Tongcheng School, ancient-style prose criticism, academic value, methodological value

余祖坤. 王又朴的古文批评及其价值[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 35(2): 41-49.

Yu Zukun. On Wang Youpu's Criticism on the Ancient-Style Prose and Its Value[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2015, 35(2): 41-49.

方苞：《方苞集》。上海：上海古籍出版社，2008年。
[Fang, Bao. Fang Bao’s Works. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2008.]
——：《方望溪遗集》，徐天祥、陈蕾点校。合肥：黄山书社，1990年。
[----: Fang Bao’s Posthumous Works. Eds. Xu Tianxiang and Chen Lei. Hefei: Huangshan Bookstore, 1990.]
关爱和：“义法说：桐城派古文艺术论的起点和基石”，《文艺研究》6（2004）：66-73。
[Guan, Aihe. “The Notion of Yifa (Meaning and Method): The Origin and Foundation of Tongcheng School’s Theory of the Ancient-Style Prose.” Literature & Art Studies 6 (2004): 66-73.]
郭绍虞：《中国文学批评史》。上海：上海古籍出版社，1979年。
[Guo, Shaoyu. A History of Chinese Literary Criticism. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1979.]
纪昀等：《钦定四库全书总目》。北京：中华书局，1997年。
[Ji, Yun, et al. General Catalogue of Complete Library of Four Treasuries. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1997.]
刘声木：《桐城文学渊源考》，《历代文话》第10册，王水照编。上海：复旦大学出版社，2007年。
[Liu, Shengmu. A Textual Research into the Literary Source of Tongcheng School. Commentaries on Prose across the Dynasties. Vol. 10. Ed. Wang Shuizhao. Shanghai: Fudan University Publishing House, 2007.]
施耐庵：《金圣叹批评本水浒传》，金圣叹评。南京：凤凰出版社，2010年。
[Shi, Nai’an. Water Margin Annotated by Jin Shengtan. Annotated. Jin Shengtan. Nanjing: Phoenix Press, 2010.]
司马迁：《史记》。北京：中华书局，2013年。
[Sima, Qian. Records of the Grand Historian. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2013.]
孙德谦：《太史公书义法》。四益宧刊本，1923年。
[Sun, Deqian. On “Yifa” of Records of the Grand Historian. The Edition Printed by Siyihuan, 1923.]
王鸣盛：《十七史商榷》。上海：上海书店出版社，2005年。
[Wang, Mingsheng. Some Personal Understandings on The Seventeen History Books. Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House, 2005.]
王又朴：《王介山古文》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[Wang, Youpu：Ancient-Style Prose Works of Wang Jieshan. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
——：《介山年谱》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[----. Chronological Biography of Wang Jieshan. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
——：《王介山时文》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[----. Contemporary Essays of Wang Jieshan. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
——：《史记七篇读法》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[----. Reading Techniques of Seven Biographies in The Records of the Grand Historian. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
——：《诗礼堂杂纂》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[----. Miscellaneous Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
——：《孟子读法》，《诗礼堂全集》。清刻本。
[----. Methods to Read the Works of Mencius. The Complete Works from Poetry-Rite Hall. Block-Printed Edition in the Qing Dynasty.]
朱熹：《孟子集注》，《四书章句集注》。北京：中华书局，1983年。
[Zhu, Xi. Collected Annotations to the Works of Mencius. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1983.]

[1]	潘务正. 桐城派“诗文一理”论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(5): 107-119.
[2]	罗先海. 新时期长篇小说版本批评及学术价值论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(3): 11-22.
[3]	杨新平. 桐城派“逆笔”批评论——以文章选本评点为中心 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2021, 41(3): 198-209.
[4]	蒋寅. 海内论诗有正宗姬传身在最高峰——姚鼐诗学品格与渊源刍论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 35(5): 146-157.
[5]	陈引驰. “文”学的声音：古代文章与文章学中声音问题略说 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2012, 32(5): 35-42.

王又朴的古文批评及其价值

On Wang Youpu's Criticism on the Ancient-Style Prose and Its Value

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价