论李白的批评家身份和批评体系——以他对玄宗诗坛的批评为中心

文艺理论研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 107-113+137.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇下一篇

论李白的批评家身份和批评体系——以他对玄宗诗坛的批评为中心

刘青海

上海师范大学人文与传播学院

出版日期:2012-01-25 发布日期:2012-03-24
作者简介:刘青海，北京大学博士，上海师范大学人文与传播学院副教授，主要从事中古诗歌史及文学史研究。
基金资助:
上海市重点学科中国古代文学项目成果[项目编号“S30403”]；上海师范大学重点学科建设古典文献学阶段性成果

Li Bai as a Critic of the Poetry Scene in Emperor Xuanzong's Reign

Liu Qinghai

College of Humanities at Shanghai Normal University (Shanghai 200234, China)

Online:2012-01-25 Published:2012-03-24
About author:Liu Qinghai is a PhD. candidate at Peking University. She is also an associate professor with College of Humanities at Shanghai Normal University (Shanghai 200234, China). Her main academic interest is the history of medieval poetry.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

就作为批评家的李白而言，他的批评活动主要是由对诗史的批评与对当代诗坛的批评两部分构成的。虽然两部分之间有联系，但历来注意得比较多的是他对诗史的批评，而他对当代诗坛的批则较少受到关注。李白对玄宗诗坛的批评，主要包括三个方面：首先，《古风》其一中对玄宗诗坛的总的论述，表现出作为批评家的李白对于当代诗坛的宏观把握与整体肯定；其次，他对孟浩然、杜甫、贺知章、李华、韦良宰、崔成甫等同时代诗人的批评，不但贯穿了他在《古风》其一中所提出的“复古”“风雅”“正声”“怨刺”等审美标准，并且还创造了清真、天真、天然、风流、逸兴等一系列李白特有的范畴，由此构成他独到的诗歌审美理想；再次，李白对自身创作的观照与期许，如他对“清雄”风格的自觉体认与追求，在对“谪仙人”称号的认可背后所体现的对天才性的认识，以及对自身创作的“制作”期许等等，体现出作为批评家的李白在创作中的高度自觉。

关键词: 玄宗诗坛, 复古, 风雅, 清真, 清雄, 制作

Abstract: As a critic, Li Bai's critical practice consists of his comments on the poetry history and on the coeval poetry writing, which are inherently related with each other. Comparatively speaking, his insights into contemporary poetry writing rarely attract researcher's attention. His achievements in this field mainly include the following. Firstly, in Gu Feng No.1 [Old Airs], Li Bai expounds his view on coeval poetry writing which reflects his general understanding and positive affirmation of it. Secondly, besides aesthetical standards such as "restoring the ancient," "airs and odes" and "rectified sound," which are the basic guidelines of his commentary on the writing of Meng Haoran, Du Fu, He Zhizhang, Li Hua, Wei Liangzai, Cui Chengfu, he also creates a series of concepts of his own such as purity and genuineness, artlessness, naturalness, unblocked grace, unconstrained inspiration, which embody his unique aesthetic ideals. Thirdly, his evaluation and keen anticipation of his own writing, for example, his realization and pursuit of a clear and sublime style, his realization of being gifted, and his hope to create literary artifacts, all reflect his keen consciousness as a discerning critic.

Key words: poetry scene in Emperor Xuanzong's reign, restoring the ancient, airs and odes, purity and genuineness, clear and sublime, literary artifact

中图分类号:

刘青海. 论李白的批评家身份和批评体系——以他对玄宗诗坛的批评为中心[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2012, 32(1): 107-113+137.

Liu Qinghai. Li Bai as a Critic of the Poetry Scene in Emperor Xuanzong's Reign[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2012, 32(1): 107-113+137.

钱志熙：《论李白<古风>五十九首的整体性》，《文学遗产》2010年第1期。

[Qian, Zhixi. “On the Consistency of Li Bai’s Fifty-nine Gufeng Poems,” Literary Heritage (1)2010, p.24-32.]

《唐人选唐诗（十种）》，北京：中华书局1958年。

[Ten Anthologies of Tang Poems Selected by Tang Scholars. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1958.]

钱志熙《中国古代的文学史构建及其特点》，《文学遗产》2003年第6期。

[Qian, Zhixi. “The Construction of the Ancient Chinese Literary History and its Characteristics.” Literary Heritage (6)2003, p.14-23 ]

（清）董皓等修《全唐文》，上海：上海古籍出版社1990年版。

[Dong, Hao. Comp. Quantangwen [The Complete Literary Prose from Tang Dynasty]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1990]

近代丁福保辑《历代诗话续编》，北京：中华书局1983年。

[Ding, Fubao, ed. A Sequel to Poetry Notes across Dynasties. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company,1983.]

《四部丛刊》影印明刊本，上海：商务印书馆，1922-1936。

[Sibu Congkan. Shanghai: The Commercial Press,1922-1936]

顾学颉校点《白居易集》，北京：中华书局1979年。

[Bai, Juyi. Collected Works of Bai Juyi. Ed. Gu Xuejie. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1979.]

范文澜《文心雕龙注》，北京：人民文学出版社1958年。

[Fan, Wenlan. Annotations to The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House, 1958.]

（清）王琦《李太白全集》，北京：中华书局1977年。

[Li, Bai. The Complete Works of Li Taibai. Comp. Wang Qi. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1977.]

(明)许学夷《诗源辨体》，北京：人民文学出版社1998年。

[Xu, Xueyi. Shiyuan bianti [Investigating the Style of Poetry Sources]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House, 1998.]

（清）严可均辑《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文》，北京：中华书局1958年。

[Yan, Kejun, comp. Collected Literary Works from the Antiquity through Qin-Han to the Period of Six Dynasties. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1958.]

[1]	李亚峰. 个性禀赋与学问世运：王闾运诗学复古现象新论 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(4): 120-127.
[2]	郑妙苗. 诗学论著在明代的形成与发展 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(3): 56-64.
[3]	陈妙丹. “今之乐犹古之乐”说的接受维度探析 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(4): 130-138.
[4]	李舜华. 冷谦律与明代礼乐更制的雅俗之争——兼议元明复古（乐）思潮的南北消长 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(4): 91-102.
[5]	袁宪泼. 以书喻诗：明代复古派的书学与诗学 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(2): 79-87.
[6]	李舜华. 从四方新声到弦索官腔——“中原音韵”与元季明初南北曲的消长 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(2): 139-150.
[7]	程芸. 明代曲学复古与元曲的经典化 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(2): 163-170.
[8]	余意. 复古思潮与明代词学 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(5): 103-111.

论李白的批评家身份和批评体系——以他对玄宗诗坛的批评为中心

Li Bai as a Critic of the Poetry Scene in Emperor Xuanzong's Reign

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价