Richard Rorty and the Possibility of a Neo-pragmatic Literary Theory

Abstract

Abstract: In virtue of the logic of Richard Rorty's neo-pragmatism, it is problematic to claim that Rorty's literary theory is based on his philosophy. Rather, Rorty as a neo-pragmatist and a literary theorist can both make more sense if they are put together. So we may need start from the controversy over the definition of neo-pragmatism, and activate the tension between literature and philosophy, in order to give a more thoughtful examination of Rorty's design of literary theory. Besides, we can divide theories into three types according to their function: inquiry, problematization, and therapeutics. Thus we may place better a possible neo-pragmatic literary theory, including how it asks, how it thinks, and how it answers.

Key words: Rorty, neo-pragmatism, literary theory

CLC Number:

Tang Yonghua. Richard Rorty and the Possibility of a Neo-pragmatic Literary Theory[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art.

References

Bernstein, Richard J. “The Resurgence of Pragmatism.” Social Research 59.4 Frontiers in Social Inquiry (1992): 813-40. Brandom, Robert B., ed. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. 斯坦利·卡维尔：《言必所指·序言》。上海：上海外语教育出版社，2009年。 [Cavell, Stanley. “Foreword.” Must We Mean What We Say? Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2009.] ---. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. 乔纳森·卡勒：《文学理论入门》，李平译。南京：译林出版社，2008年。 [Culler, Jonathan. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Trans. Li Ping. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2008.] Drong, Leszek. Disciplining the New Pragmatism: Theory, Rhetoric, and the Ends of Literary Study. Frankfurt and Main: Peter Lang, 2007. 翁贝托·艾柯等：《诠释与过度诠释》，王宇根译。北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2005年。 [Eco, Umberto, et al. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Trans. Wang Yugen. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2005.] 加里·古廷：《福柯》，王育平译。南京：译林出版社，2010年。 [Gutting, Gary. Foucault. Trans. Wang Yuping. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2010.] Hall, David L., and Richard Rorty. Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism. New York: State University of New York Press, 1994. 苏珊·哈克编：《意义、真理与行动——实用主义经典文选》，陈波译。北京：东方出版社，2007年。 [Haack, Susan, ed. Meaning, Truth and Action: Selected Works of Pragmatism. Trans. Chen Bo. Beijing: Oriental Press, 2007.] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯：“论杜威的《确定性的寻求》”，童世骏译，《确定性的寻求——关于知行关系的研究》，杜威著，傅统先译。上海：上海人民出版社，2005年。1-5。 [Harbermas, Jürgen. “On Dewey’s The Quest for Certainty.” Trans. Tong Shijun. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. John Dewey. Trans. Fu Tongxian. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2005. 1-5.] 沃尔夫冈·伊瑟尔：《怎样做理论》，朱刚、谷婷婷、潘玉莎译。南京：南京大学出版社，2008年。 [Iser, Wolfgang. How to Do Theory. Trans. Zhu Gang, Gu Tingting, and Pan Yusha. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2008.] 威廉·詹姆斯：《实用主义——一些旧思想方法的新名称》，陈羽纶、孙瑞禾译。北京：商务印书馆，1979年。 [James, William. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Trans. Chen Yulun and Sun Ruihe. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1979.] 文森特·里奇：《20世纪30年代至80年代的美国文学批评》，王顺珠译。北京：北京大学出版社，2013年。 [Leitch, Vincent B. American Literary Criticism from the Thirties to the Eighties. Trans. Wang Shunzhu. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013.] Nail, Gross. Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008. Nussbaum, Martha. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. 理查德·罗蒂：《筑就我们的国家：20世纪美国左派思想》，黄宗英译。北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2014年。 [Rorty, Richard. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America. Trans. Huang Zongying. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2014.] ---. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982. ——：《偶然、反讽与团结》，徐文瑞译。上海：商务印书馆，2003年。 [---. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Trans. Xu Wenrui. Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 2003.] ---. “Looking Back at ‘Literary Theory’”. Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Ed. Haun Saussy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. 63-67. ---. Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin Group, 1999. ——：《真理与进步》，杨玉成译。北京：华夏出版社，2003年。 [---. Truth and Progress. Trans. Yang Yucheng. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2003.] ——：《文化政治哲学》，张国清译。北京：北京大学出版社，2011年。 [---. Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Trans. Zhang Guoqing. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011.] ——：《哲学、文学和政治》，黄宗英等译。上海：上海译文出版社，2009年。 [---. Philosophy, Literature and Politics. Trans. Huang Zongying, et al. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2009.] 理查德·舒斯特曼：《表面与深度：批评与文化的辩证法》，李鲁宁译。北京：北京大学出版社，2014年。 [Shusterman, Richard. Surface and Depth: Dialectics of Criticism and Culture. Trans. Li Luning. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014.] Schulenberg, Ulf. “Wanting Lovers Rather than Knowers—Richard Rorty's Neopragmatism.” Amerikastudien / American Studies 48.4 (2003): 577-608. 康乃尔·韦斯特：《美国人对哲学的逃避：实用主义的谱系》，董山民译。南京：南京大学出版社，2016年。 [West, Cornel. The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism.Trans. Dong Shanmin. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2016.]

[1]	Wang Ning. Raymond Williams' Significance to Current Literary and Cultural Studies [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 20-29.
[2]	Yang Qing, Cao Shunqing. Re-thinking “Eastern Comparative Literature” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 30-39.
[3]	Chen Dandan. From World Literature to World Literary Theory： An Attempt to Approach Cross-cultural Aesthetics [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(6): 40-48.
[4]	Wang Hongyue. Metamodernism: Thoughts on Literary Theory “after Postmodernism” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(4): 162-171.
[5]	Tang Yonghua. Hermeneutics of Language, Truth and New Pragmatism: Richard Rorty’s Interpretation of Donald Davidson [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(2): 126-136.
[6]	Han Wei. The Interplay between Traditional Literary Theory and Marxist Literary Criticism in the Past Hundred Years [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(6): 1-12.
[7]	Duan Jifang. How the Althusserian Critics Inherit and Develop Marx’s Thought of Artistic Production [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(5): 48-57.
[8]	Lin Weixuan. “Poetic Wisdom” or “Poetic Knowledge”: On the Interlingual Transformation of “Della Sapienza Poetica” [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(2): 78-89.
[9]	Lai Daren. The Progressive Logic of Contemporary Literary Theory and Its Theoretical Reflection [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(6): 1-9.
[10]	Jiang Shuzhuo. Xu Zhongyu's Contributions to the Study of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(5): 1-17.
[11]	Yang Dongxiao. On the Theory of Literary "Craftsmanship" during the Six Dynasties [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(3): 46-55.
[12]	Lu Yaming. Humanistic Discourse and Knowledge Production of Literary Theory in the Early Years of the New Era [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(5): 63-71.
[13]	Han Shangrong. Cunning Apparatus and the Pain of Modern Literature: A Parallactic Reading of Kojin Karatani's Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(5): 83-91.
[14]	Li Jianzhong. Reinterpreting the Concept of Human in the Pre-Qin Classics of Literary Theory [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(3): 134-.
[15]	Zhang Yunyan. Renewing the Centurial Discourse of Chinese Literary Theory Through the Genealogy of Spirit: Case Study of Zong Baihua and Li Changzhi [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(2): 88-96.