Art as the Foundation of History: On the Historical Dimension of Heidegger's Art Criticism

Song Congcong

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2) : 189-198.

PDF(1875 KB)
Welcome to Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, Aug. 15, 2025
PDF(1875 KB)
Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2) : 189-198.
Western Literary Theory and Studies in Aesthetics

Art as the Foundation of History: On the Historical Dimension of Heidegger's Art Criticism

  • Song Congcong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In the latest years, the debate between Heidegger and Schapiro on Van Gogh's Shoes has received considerable attention among the Chinese scholars. Despite the controversy over Heidegger's interpretation of the painting, scholars have reached an agreement that Heidegger's art criticism derives from his philosophy of art and therefore lacks the insight of art history abundant in Schapiro's scholarship. This assertion, to a certain extent, misunderstands Heidegger's thought. This paper argues that Heidegger's art criticism also contains a historical dimension, for he not only investigates art history but also pays close attention to the relationship between art and history. The difference, however, is that Schapiro examines the history of specific artworks, whereas Heidegger explores the origin and essence of art. In other words, the former views history as the basis for evaluating art, while the latter attempts to institute art as the foundation for history. This historical dimension in Heidegger's art criticism can be understood on three levels: to institute art as the foundation the history of Dasein, to institute art as the foundation for the history of the nation, and to institute art as the foundation for the history of Seyn.

Key words

Heidegger / art / history / Dasein / Seyn

Cite this article

Download Citations
Song Congcong. Art as the Foundation of History: On the Historical Dimension of Heidegger's Art Criticism[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(2): 189-198

References

 

Cimino, Antonio, David Espinet, and Tobias Keiling. “Kunst und Geschichte.” Heideggers

Ursprung des Kunstwerks: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar. Eds. David Espinet and Tobias Keiling. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2011. 123-38.

杰夫·柯林斯《海德格尔与纳粹》赵成文译。北京北京大学出版社2005年。

[Collins, Jeff. Heidegger and the Nazis. Trans. Zhao Chengwen. BeijingPeking University Press,

2005.]

Dreyfus, Hubert L. “Heidegger’s Ontology of Art.” A Companion to Heidegger. Ed. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall. Malden: Blackwell, 2008. 407-19.

奈斯克·贡特 埃米尔·克特琳编:《回答?马丁·海德格尔说话了》,陈春文译。南京:

江苏教育出版社,2005年。

[Günther, Neske, and Emil Kettering, eds. Answer: Martin Heidegger in Dialogue. Trans. Chen

Chunwen. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House, 2005.]

黑格尔《美学》第一卷),朱光潜译。北京商务印书馆1979年。

[Hegel., Georg wilhelm Friedrich. Aesthetics. Trans. Zhu Guangqian, vol. 1. Beijing: The

Commercial Press, 1979.]

海德格尔《哲学论稿》孙周兴译。北京商务印书馆2012年。

[Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy. Trans. Sun Zhouxing. Beijing: The Commercial

Press, 2012.]

——:《在通向语言的途中》,孙周兴译。北京:商务印书馆,2004 年。

[---. On the Way to Language. Trans. Sun Zhouxing. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2004.]

——:《存在与时间》陈嘉映、王庆节译。北京生活·读书·新知三联书店2006年。

[---. Sein und Zeit. Trans. Chen Jiaying and Wang Qingjie. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2006.]

——:《现象学之基本问题》,丁耘译。上海:上海译文出版社,2008年。

[---. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Ding Yun. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation

Publishing House, 2008.]

Heidegger, Martin. Einführung in die Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983.

---. Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1981.

---. Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.

---. “Schöpferische Landschaft: Warum Bleiben Wir in der Provinz.” Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983. 9-13.

---. “Über die Sixtina.” Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983. 119-21.

马琳:“艺术作品究竟为何’?——从《存有与时间》来解读海德格尔的艺术哲思”,《中

山大学学报》(社会科学版)42016):123–32

[Ma, Lin. “What ‘Thing’ Is Artwork: Heidegger’s Philosophy of Art in Being and Time.” Journal

of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition) 4 (2016): 123-32.]

Safranski, Rüdiger. Ein Meister aus Deutschland: Heidegger und seine Zeit. Frankfurt am Main:

Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1997.

迈耶·夏皮罗·麦耶:《艺术的理论与哲学——风格、艺术家和社会》沈语冰、王玉冬译。南京江苏凤凰美术出版社2016年。

[Schapiro, Meyer. Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society. Trans. Shen Yubing

and Wang Yudong. Nanjing: Jiangsu Phoenix Fine Arts Publishing House, 2016.]

 

Funding

2019 Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Planned Project(19NDQN344YB) 
PDF(1875 KB)

892

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/