A Query about the "Peasant Uprising" and "Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels" Hypotheses: An Analysis of the Identities and Occupations of the Heroes and Their Uprising Causes in Water Margin

Liu Zhaoming

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6) : 59-69.

PDF(1146 KB)
Welcome to Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, Aug. 4, 2025
PDF(1146 KB)
Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6) : 59-69.
Classical Literary Theory and Criticism

A Query about the "Peasant Uprising" and "Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels" Hypotheses: An Analysis of the Identities and Occupations of the Heroes and Their Uprising Causes in Water Margin

  • Liu Zhaoming
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In the thematic and narrative study of Water Margin, the "Peasant Uprising" and "Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels" hypotheses, though frequently questioned, still hold unshakable position among works on Chinese Literary History, popular readings and even Chinese language textbooks for high school. In fact, statistics suggest that instead of all the 108 heroes in the story, only 11 were peasants from the angle of big agriculture, and only 9 were compelled to join the Liangshan Rebels. This thesis proposes three interpretations underlying such long-lasting misunderstanding: 1) "Peasant Uprising" and "Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels" hypotheses greatly overlap with the modern Chinese proletarian revolution in the revolutionary and rebellious spirits; 2) the ideologicalization of the hypotheses has direct relation with the success of the historical drama Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels adapted in 1943; and 3) studies on Water Margin since 1949 are interwoven with politics.

Key words

Water Margin / peasant uprising / driven to join the Liangshan Rebels / query

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Zhaoming . A Query about the "Peasant Uprising" and "Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels" Hypotheses: An Analysis of the Identities and Occupations of the Heroes and Their Uprising Causes in Water Margin [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2017, 37(6): 59-69

References

[1]薄一波:“回忆片断”, 《人民日报》1981年12月26日。[Bo, Yibo.“Reminiscences.”People’s Daily, 26 Dec.1981.] [2]陈桂声:“《水浒传》‘梁山泊聚义’性质论析——兼与欧阳健、萧相恺二先生商榷”, 《河北师范大学学报》1 (1994) :27-32。[Chen, Guisheng.“A Study on the Theme of Revolts in Water Margin.”Journal of Hebei Normal University 1 (1994) :27-32.] [3]《忆董老》第2辑, 湖北省社会科学院编。武汉:湖北人民出版社, 1982年。[Commemorating Dong Biwu.Vol.2.Ed.Hubei Academy of Social Science.Wuhan:Hubei People’s Press, 1982.] [4]课程教材研究所:语文 (九年级) 。北京:人民教育出版社, 2003年。[Curriculum and Teaching Materials Research Institute.Chinese (Grade 9) .Beijing:People’s Education Press, 2003.] [5]董志新:“毛泽东与‘水浒精神’”, 《毛泽东读〈水浒传〉》。沈阳:万卷出版公司, 2011年。[Dong, Zhixin.“Mao Zedong and Water Margin Spirit.”Mao Zedong’s Impression of the Water Margin.Shenyang:Rolls Publishing Company, 2011.] [6]——:“新披露的毛泽东谈论《水浒传》文献资料”, 《水浒争鸣》第十五辑《孙权故里论水浒——第二届杭州与水浒学术研讨会暨中国水浒文化富阳高峰论坛论文集》, 2014年11月20日, 15-24, 浙江杭州。[---.“Newly Revealed Materials about Mao Zedong’s Talk on Water Margin.”Arguments on Water Margin.Vol.15 .Collected Papers on the Second Summit Conference about Hangzhou and Water Margin.20 Nov.2014:15-24.] [7]郭英德:《四十年古典小说研究道路批评》, 《文学遗产》3 (1989) :19-31。[Guo, Yingde.“Criticism on Forty Year Research of Classical Fiction.”Literary Heritage 3 (1989) :19-31.] [8]胡哲峰孙彦:《毛泽东谈毛泽东》。北京:中共中央党校出版社, 2008年。[Hu, Zhefeng, and Sun Yan.Mao in Mao Zedong’s Eyes.Beijing:CCP Central Party School Press, 2008.] [9]惠雁冰:“重评延安平剧《逼上梁山》”, 《中国现代文学研究丛刊》2 (2014) :142-51。[Hui, Yanbing.“Re-evaluation of the Opera Driven to the Liangshan Rebels.”Studies on Modern Chinese Literature2 (2014) :142-51.] [10]金冲及:《毛泽东传 (1893—1949) 》。北京:中央文献出版社, 1996年。[Jin, Chongji.The Biography of Mao Zedong (1893-1949) .Beijing:Central Party Literature Press, 1996.] [11]金紫光:“毛主席关于《逼上梁山》的信必须恢复原貌”, 《人民戏剧》12 (1978) :4-6。[Jin, Ziguang.“Compulsory Restoration of Mao’s Letter on Driven to the Liangshan Rebels.”People’s Drama 12 (1978) :4-6.] [12]李希凡:“水浒的现实主义”, 《文史哲》7 (1957) :42-48。[Li, Xifan.“Realism in Water Margin.”Literature, History and Philosophy 7 (1957) :42-48.] [13]凌左义:“论忠奸斗争是《水浒》描写的主线”, 《水浒争鸣》2 (1983) :233-37。[Ling, Zuoyi.“On Main Plot of Water Margin:Conflicts between Loyalty and Betrayal.”Arguments on Water Margin 2 (1983) :233-37. [14]鲁迅:《鲁迅全集·集外集》 (7) 。北京:人民文学出版社, 2005年。[Lu, Xun.Complete Works of Lu Xun.Vol.7.Beijing:People’s Literature Publishing House, 2005.] [15]“毛主席于1944年在延安看了《逼上梁山》后写给杨绍萱齐燕铭二同志的信”, 《人民戏剧》1950年4月1日创刊号。[“Mao’s letter to Yang Shaoxuan and Qi Yanming about the Opera Driven to the Liangshan Rebels in 1944.”People’s Drama 1 Apr.1950.] [16]毛泽东:“中国革命与中国共产党”, 《毛泽东选集》 (第二卷) 。北京:人民出版社, 1991年。[Mao, Zedong.“Chinese Revolution and Communist Party of China.”Selected Works of Mao Zedong.Vol.2.Beijing:People’s Publishing House, 1991.] [17]——:《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》, 《毛泽东选集》 (第三卷) 。北京:人民出版社, 1991年。[---.“Mao Zedong’s Talks at the Yan’an Conference on Literature and Art.”Selected Works of Mao Zedong.Vol.3.Beijing:People’s Publishing House, 1991.] [18]斯图尔特·施拉姆:《毛泽东》。北京:红旗出版社, 1987年。[Schram, Stuart R.Mao Zedong.Beijing:Red Flag Publishing House, 1987.] [19]《毛泽东外交文选》。北京:中央文献出版社, 1994年。[Selected Diplomatic Writings of Mao Zedong.Beijing:Central Literary Contributions Publishing Bureau, 1994.] [20]施耐庵罗贯中:《水浒全传》第71回。长沙:岳麓书社, 1988年。[Shi, Naian, and Luo Guanzhong.Water Margin.Ch.71.Changsha:Yuelu Publishing House, 1988.] [21]《毛泽东一九三六年同斯诺的谈话》。北京:人民出版社, 1979年。[Talks between Mao Zedong and Snow in 1936.Beijing:People’s Publishing House, 1979.] [22]王炳南:“阳光普照雾山城——忆毛泽东在重庆”, 《人民文学》9 (1977) :23-27。[Wang, Bingnan.“Reminiscence of Mao’s stay in Chongqing.”People’s Literature 9 (1977) :23-27.] [23]王利器:“水浒与农民革命”, 《光明日报》1953年5月27、28 日。[Wang, Liqi.“Water Margin and Peasant Uprising.”Guang Ming Daily 27/28 May.1953.] [24]王学泰:“〈水浒传〉思想本质新论——评‘农民起义说’等”, 《文史哲》4 (2004) :117-26。[Wang, Xuetai.“New Review about Peasant Uprising in Water Margin.”Literature, History and Philosophy 4. (2004) :117-26.] [25]汪远平:“论‘逼上梁山’”, 《西南师范大学学报》1 (1986) :35-44。[Wang, Yuanping.“On Driven to the Liangshan Rebels.”Journal of Southwest Normal University 1 (1986) :35-44.] [26]武思萦樊静:《毛泽东和他喜欢的二十本书》。昆明:云南人民出版社, 1993年。[Wu, Siying, and Fan Jing.Mao Zedong and His Favorite20 Books.Kunming:Yunnan People’s Publishing House, 1993.] [27]吴志达:“《水浒传》的思想性及其存在的问题”, 《水浒争鸣》 (2) 1983:72-84。[Wu, Zhida.“The Ideology of Water Margin and Its Problems.”Arguments on Water Margin 2 (1983) :72-84.] [28]杨绍萱:“论水浒传与水浒戏”, 《人民戏剧》 (5) 1950。[Yang, Shaoxuan.“On Water Margin and Dramas Adapted from It.”People’s Drama 5 (1950) .] [29]伊永文:“再论《水浒传》是反映市民阶层利益的作品”, 《河北大学学报》4 (1980) :65-75。[Yi, Yongwen.“A Further Study on‘Water Margin—A Work Representing the Interest of the Lower Class’.”Journal of Hebei University 4 (1980) :65-75.] [30]游国恩等编:《中国文学史》 (四) 。北京:人民文学出版社, 1964年。[You, Guoen.History of Chinese Literature.Vol.4.Beijing:People’s Literature Publishing House, 1964.] [31]虞云国:“毛泽东评《水浒》:怎样的政治书?”, 《东方早报》2011年9月11日。[Yu, Yunguo.“Mao Zedong’s Comments on Water Margin:What Kind of Politics Book it is.”Oriental Morning Post11 Sep.2011.] [32]袁行霈主编:《中国文学史》第四卷。北京:高等教育出版社, 2005年。[Yuan, Xingpei ed.History of Chinese Literature.Vol.4.Beijing:High Education Press, 2005.] [33]朱一玄:《水浒传·前言》。北京:人民文学出版社, 1997年。[Zhu, Yixuan.Preface of Water Margin.Beijing:People’s Literature Press, 1997.] [34]诸葛志:“‘逼上梁山’具体涵义考论”, 《浙江师大学报》 (社会科学版) 1 (1997) :32-37。[Zhuge, Zhi.“Study on the Implication of Driven to Join the Liangshan Rebels.”Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Natural Sciences) 1 (1997) :32-37.]
Water Margin" title="Share on Weibo" target="_blank">
PDF(1146 KB)

906

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/