Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons and the Study on Texts in the Ming Dynasty

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 171-177.

• Modern and Contemporary Literary Theory and Criticism • Previous Articles Next Articles

Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons and the Study on Texts in the Ming Dynasty

Bai Jianzhong

the College of Chinese Language and Literature, Shanxi Normal University (Linfen 041004, China)

Online:2016-05-25 Published:2017-09-29
About author:Bai Jianzhong, PhD, is an associate professor in the College of Chinese Language and Literature, Shanxi Normal University (Linfen 041004, China), with main academic interest in Chinese ancient literary theory.

Abstract

Abstract: The study of Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons emerged in the Ming Dynasty for many reasons, among which the Six-Dynasty School's attention to the work was an important factor. The influence of Literary Mind was so great in the Ming-Dynasty study on texts that the first monograph on text study A General Survey of Literary Texts (Wen Tong) was written in the style of Literary Mind in late Ming Dynasty. Some of the influential and important concepts in Wen Tong were either inherited from or developed upon Literary Mind, which showed that the Ming-Dynasty scholars could both inherit the legacy of literary text studies and develop their own academic field.

Key words:

Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, Ming Dynasty, study on literary text

Bai Jianzhong. Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons and the Study on Texts in the Ming Dynasty[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2016, 36(3): 171-177.

[1]	Wang Tingfa. Reconstructing the Relationship between Poetry and Zen and Incorporating Confucianism into Zen in the Late Ming Dynasty: Centering on Chuiwan Guangzhen [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2022, 42(2): 211-226.
[2]	Liu Jianxin. Mao Jin’s Emphasis on Celebrated Drama and the Compilation of Sixty Plays [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 41(3): 166-175.
[3]	Cai Yaping, Cheng Guofu. On the "Portrait Paintings" in the Late-Ming Fictions and Xiqu [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(6): 149-159.
[4]	Zheng Miaomiao. The Emergence and Development of Poetic Treatises during the Ming Dynasty [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(3): 56-64.
[5]	Wan Qingchuan. The Political Dimension of Vernacular Fictions during the Ming Dynasty as Exemplified by Fictions on Major Historical Events [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2020, 40(3): 95-106.
[6]	Tuo Jianqing. The Aesthetics of Parody in The Late Ming Dynasty [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2019, 39(5): 11-21.
[7]	Chen Zhiyong . New Evidence to Some Issues of the Linchuan School of Drama in the Ming Dynasty: On the basis of the Historical Facts of Tang Xianzu's Associating with His Fellow Countrymen [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2018, 38(3): 129-140.
[8]	Wang Jingyi, Qian Xisheng. The Cultural Significance of the Chain Ci-Poems in the Ming Dynasty [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(4): 155-164.
[9]	Cheng Yun. The Ming-Dynasty Restorative Trend of the Study of Qu and the Canonization of the Yuan-Dynasty-Style Qu [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(2): 163-170.
[10]	Yu Yi. The Antiquity-Revival Movement and the Study of Ci-Poetry in the Ming Dynasty [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(5): 103-111.
[11]	He Shihai. Genre Criticism in Ming Dynasty and Zhu Yao's The Genre of Ancient Rhapsody [J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2013, 33(1): 19-26.

Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons and the Study on Texts in the Ming Dynasty

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments