Welcome to Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art,

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 187-197.

• Western Literary Theory and Criticism • Previous Articles     Next Articles

An Access to Europe's "Límpensé": François Jullien's Conceptualization of Classical Chinese Aesthetics

Han Zhenhua   

  1. the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Foreign Studies University
  • Online:2019-09-25 Published:2020-03-18
  • About author:Han Zhenhua, Ph. D., is an associate professor in the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Foreign Studies University. His areas of academic specialty include Chinese philosophy, aesthetics, and the Western interpretations of Confucianism.
  • Supported by:

    the General Project of National Social Sciences Fund (17BZX049), Information Center of World Asia Research at Beijing Foreign Studies University, and the First-class Discipline Construction Research Fund of Beijing Foreign Studies University (YY19ZZA031)

Abstract:

The classical Chinese aesthetics that French sinologist François Jullien tries to construct is centered on such notions as plain (la fadeur), non-objet, désontologie, and l'immanence. In so doing, Jullien aims to give Europe an access to  "l'impensé" via Chinese aesthetics. However, his endeavour presents itself to be more like a derivative of post-structuralist  theories of Foucault and Deleuze and an invention than a reliable representation of China. On the fundamental level, Jullien's views of Chinese thought follows those of Hegel and Max Weber. Although he tries to reexamine Hegel's negative comments on China, his seemingly exquisite discussions fail to rectify the stereotyical notion of European Sinology. Meanwhile, Jullien values the Heideggerian concept of "the undifferentiated basis prior to the realization of form," which has a non-interventional and non-political import. Despite this philosophical ambition, Jullien fails to reach out to reflecting contemporary socio-political problems and therefore his aesthetic construction entails questions in terms of its relevance to current politics.

Key words: Fran?ois Jullien, Chinese aesthetics, plain, non-object, immanence