Welcome to Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art,

Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 127-135.

• Issue in Focus: Art Theory Studies • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Second Nature and Modern Art: On Lukács' Response to Hegel's "End of Art"

Lu Kaihua   

  1. the Department of Philosophy at East Normal University
  • Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-03-19
  • About author:Lu Kaihua, doctor of Philosophy, is a Chenhui scholar in the Department of Philosophy at East Normal University (Shanghai 200241, China). His research interests include Western Marxism and Marxist aesthetic.
  • Supported by:

    the Perspective of Frontier Research of Foreign Marxism" [Young Scholar’s Projects, No. 2018EZX001] and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities East China Normal University "Study on Hegel Philosophy from the Perspective of Marxist Philosophy" [No. 2018ECNU-HLYT043]

Abstract: To comprehend Hegel's argument that "Art is a thing of the past", one needs to learn Hegel's basic judgment of modern society which is derived from his concept of "second nature". Young Lukács, however, in light of Hegel, gives his own negative version of "second nature" and his judgment of the relation between the modern world and modern art in respect of lyric poetry and novel. Therefore, it is the interaction between the concept of second nature and the concept of modern art that helps us to make sense of why Lukács took a course against Hegel, though he had absorbed dialectics and philosophy art from Hegel.

Key words: Lukács, second nature, modern art, novel, The Theory of the Novel