文艺理论研究
• 西方文论研究 • 上一篇 下一篇
克里斯多夫·普任德葛斯特
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Christopher Prendergast
Online:
Published:
About author:
摘要: 本文探讨历史学与文学史书写中将时间以百年划分的做法,尤其关注法语词“siècle”的语用情况。本文分析“siècle”一词的词义如何在我们所谓的17世纪从“时代”或“时期”转变为现在的“一百年”。将这个转变放在古今之争的语境下讨论的同时,本文也反思,如果出现一种与这种现代历史年代学相异的反事实另类年代学,会暗含何种启示与后果。
关键词: 历史分期, 世纪, “siècle”, 叙事
Abstract: This article is about the practice of dividing historical and literary-historical time into units of 100 years, with a particular focus on the semantics of the French term "siècle". It examines how in the course of what we now call the seventeenth century the term "siècle" shifted in meaning from "age" or "epoch" to the round number 100. It contextualizes the shift with reference to the great Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns, while also reflecting on the implications and consequences of a counterfactual alternative to modern historical chronology.
Key words: periodization, century, "siècle", narrative
克里斯多夫·普任德葛斯特. “世纪化”的历史:百年何以成为历史分期的基本单位?[J]. 文艺理论研究.
Christopher Prendergast. History in Round Numbers: Why One Hundred?[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://tsla.ecnu.edu.cn/CN/
https://tsla.ecnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V38/I6/98
《古今名家诗学大成》与明代传奇小说的文体发展
电影的叙述距离:从形式到价值的考察
网络文学叙事机制下的“后情感”表征及心理症候