欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 209-216.

• 西方文论研究 • 上一篇    

艺术跨界:美学的危机或生机——以朗西埃对利奥塔的批判为中心

张昊臣   

  1. 南京大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2018-10-17
  • 作者简介:张昊臣,南京大学文学院在读博士生,文艺学专业,主要从事艺术跨界与文学多模态研究。

Art's Border Crossings, Crisis or Rebirth of Aesthetics: A Study of Rancière's Critique of Lyotard

Zhang Haochen   

  1. School of Literary Arts, Nanjing University
  • Online:2017-09-25 Published:2018-10-17
  • About author:Zhang Haochen is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Literary Arts, Nanjing University. His academic interests are art's border crossings and literary modes.

摘要: 基于审美自律与社会批判互构的乌托邦传统,不少西方学者对艺术跨界持批评态度,对艺术跨界背景下的美学走向持悲观态度。朗西埃通过反思利奥塔及其所代表的整个后现代“伦理转向”,试图激活跨界艺术的政治潜力以重建美学的批判向度。然而,由于对“不可呈现者”与“不可再现者”的混淆,朗西埃没有同情地理解利奥塔崇高美学所打开的感性学指向,其审美政治路线本身也存在一定局限。朗西埃“利奥塔批判”所呈显的洞见与偏失,不仅有助于重审美学与艺术跨界的关系,亦有助于反省审美批判本身的合理性与适用边界。

关键词: 艺术跨界, 审美政治, 朗西埃, 利奥塔, 不可见者

Abstract: Following the Utopian tradition characterized by the interaction between aesthetic autonomy and aesthetic criticism, many Western scholars have critical attitudes towards art's border crossings and therefore are pessimistic about the trend of aesthetics. Rancière, through reflections on Lyotard and the whole postmodern "ethical turn" that he represents, tries to activate the political potential within border crossings of art and thereby reconstructs aesthetics' critical dimensions. However, due to the confusion of the "unpresentable" and the "unrepresentable", Rancière does not sympathetically see Lyotard's sublime aesthetics' direction; his route of aesthetic politics also has some limitations. Both his insights and limitations as manifested in Rancière's "critique of Lyotard" help us not only to rethink the relationship between aesthetics and art's border crossings, but also to reflect on the legitimacy and borders of aesthetic criticism.

Key words: art's border Crossings, politics of aesthetics, Jacques Rancière, Jean-Francois Lyotard, the unpresentable