欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 102-109.

• 古代文论与古代文学的理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“文质”与“南北”:刘师培《南北文学不同论》探析

吴键   

  1. 北京大学(北京,100871)艺术学院
  • 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2017-09-22
  • 作者简介:吴键,北京大学(北京,100871)艺术学院艺术学理论博士研究生,主要研究领域为中国现代美学与文论。

On Liu Shipei's "On the Difference of the Southern and the Northern China's Literature"

Wu Jian   

  1. the School of Arts, Peking University (Beijing, 100871)
  • Online:2015-11-25 Published:2017-09-22
  • About author:Wu Jian is a Ph.D. student in the School of Arts, Peking University (Beijing, 100871), with academic focus on modern Chinese aesthetics and literary theory.

摘要: 本文认为,刘师培《南北文学不同论》作为中国现代文艺批评的发轫之作,依循着一种理论视角,将南北之分视为超越于历史的先在框架,依此展开对中国文学史的叙述,与将文化、文学的南北之分视为历史特定阶段的传统南北论述之间存在着范式上的断裂。但同时刘氏此论在现实关怀与学理逻辑的纠葛中,并未贯彻其文选派宗旨,在“文/质”对立之中给予后者以更多同情,在与彼时思想史、政治史的密切互动之中,呈现出一种溢出文论史的暧昧性与复杂性意义。

关键词: 刘师培, 《南北文学不同论》, 文质, 范式

Abstract: Traditional distinction between the Southern and the Northern China's literature were made on historical specificities, while Liu Shipei in his pioneer essay in modern literary criticism "On the Difference between the Southern and the Northern China's Literature" took a theoretical perspective that viewed the distinction as an ahistorical literary framework a priori. Liu's argument may be read as a point for a paradigmatic breakup, but Liu did not push forward his idea in his practice. Instead, he attached more weight to the essence (zhi) over the literary (wen) in this traditional pair of concepts, and his contribution in the history of literary theory, due to the interaction between his literary criticism and the intellectual-political history, was beyond the conventional scope of literary criticism.

Key words: Liu Shipei, "On the Difference of the Southern and the Northern China's Literature", the literary vs the essence (wenzhi), paradigm