欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 130-137.

• 现当代文论与批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

作者的变迁与新媒介时代的新文学诉求

许苗苗   

  1. 北京市社会科学院文化研究所
  • 出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-06-17
  • 作者简介:许苗苗,博士,北京市社会科学院文化研究所副研究员,首都文化发展研究中心专职研究员。主要研究方向为网络文化、都市文化。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社科基金青年项目“网络文学的媒介转型研究”[批准编号:13CZW004]的阶段性成果。

Changing Authorship: The Evolution on Literary Practices and Theory

Xu Miaomiao   

  1. the Institute of Cultural Studies, Beijing Academy of Social Science (Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-06-17
  • About author:Xu Miaomiao is an associate research fellow in the Institute of Cultural Studies, Beijing Academy of Social Science (Beijing 100101, China), with research interests in internet literature, media and culture, urban studies.

摘要: 本文以文学中“作者”概念的变迁为线索,从文学史、文学理论、媒介转换等角度思索形成壮大于印刷文化语境中文学理论的不足之处,探讨新媒体环境下文学理论的新需求。“个体作者”并非文学发展的必须,而是随着书面文字和印刷品权威的加强、知识产权法规的明晰而确立的。当前的文学理论形成并壮大于印刷文化中,自然会对这一体系的主张加以维护,它通过“风格”和“文学性”等观念巩固了个体与作者之间的联系。在网络文学实践中,作者不再局限于个人,而是成为一个文学生产的类概念。网络文学提供了一个从媒介角度看待文学实践,发展文学理论的契机,文学理论应当正视并积极应对新媒介文学。

关键词: 网络文学, 印刷文学, 媒介转换, 新媒体文学理论

Abstract: Focusing on the changing concept of author, this paper tries to investigate the new demands posed to literary theory from the new media by contextualizing its argument in the combined development of literary theory, literary history and new media. The paper claims that literary theory, due to its development in the context of print culture, increasingly shows its deficiencies in the current media. In terms of the authorship, individual authors may not have been essential for literary creation, and the concept of determined authors is established in written system and the print culture and re-enforced with the regulations of intellectual property rights. Developed in the context of print culture, contemporary literary theory will surely collaborate with the power of the print-culture system, strengthening the link between the individual reader and the author by such concepts as "literary style" and "literariness." In the internet literature, the authorship changes and it may not point to a single author, and the production of literary texts may become a categorical concept. The paper claims that internet literature may provide a new perspective to view literary practice and review literary theory, and therefore the circle of literary theory should pay positive attention to internet literature.

Key words: internet literature, print literature, media shift, new-media literary theory