欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 97-106.

• 中西文论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

雅克·朗西埃的艺术体制和当代政治艺术观

蒋洪生   

  1. 北京大学中文系
  • 出版日期:2012-03-25 发布日期:2012-08-30
  • 作者简介:蒋洪生,美国杜克大学文学博士,现为北京大学中文系博士后,主要从事比较文学、批评理论与东亚思想史研究。

Jacques Ranciere's Regimes of Art and Contemporary Political Art

Jiang Hongsheng   

  1. Beijing University
  • Online:2012-03-25 Published:2012-08-30
  • About author:Jiang Hongsheng Ph.D.(Duke University) is currently a post-doctoral researcher in comparative literature at Beijing University.

摘要: 本文探讨了朗西埃提出的艺术的三种辨识体制:影像的伦理体制、艺术的诗学/再现体制、艺术的美学体制,在这三种体制中,艺术的美学体制指向的是一种平等和民主政治,“歧感”则是其艺术与政治的联接点。本文据此重点考察了朗西埃对于当代政治艺术的批评:“批判艺术”如何步入“见证式艺术”和“关系艺术”的歧途;当代“批判艺术”如何面临着为全球化的商业逻辑收编的危险;以及当代艺术的伦理学转向对艺术的自主性和政治性的消解等等。文章最后以朗西埃解剖的艺术实例说明:在今天,政治/批判艺术意味着什么。

关键词: 艺术体制, 歧感, 美学的政治, 政治的美学, 平等

Abstract: This paper examines the three regimes of art proposed by Jacques Ranciere: the ethical regime of images, the representative/poetic regime of art, and the aesthetic regime of art which implies a politics of equality and democracy. For Ranciere, "dissensus" is the articulating point between art and politics. This paper focus on Ranciere's criticism on contemporary political art: how the "critical art" takes the wrong track toward the "testimony art" and "relational art"; how the "critical art" was polluted by the logic of global consumerism; and how the ethical turn of contemporary art constitutes a deconstruction of both the autonomy and the policity of art. In light of Ranciere's analysis of some works of art, this paper also sketches what political/critical art could mean today.

Key words: Regimes of Art, dissensus, politics of aesthetics, aesthetics of politics, equality