华语电影中的游戏与中介区间——表演理论和明星研究结合的进路

文艺理论研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 21-31.

华语电影中的游戏与中介区间——表演理论和明星研究结合的进路

张英进, 易前良

美国圣地亚哥加州大学文学系；河海大学公共管理学院

出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:张英进，上海交通大学人文学院访问讲席教授，美国圣地亚哥加州大学文学系教授，研究范围包括文学、电影、都市文化、文化史，出版英文书籍十一部，中文书籍十一部，另发表中、英、德、西班牙、葡萄牙、韩文论文150余篇。易前良，河海大学公共管理学院副教授。

Play and Liminality in Chinese Cinema: Star Studies in the Perspective of Performance Theory

Zhang Yingjin, Yi Qianliang

Literature at University of California, San Diego, USA; Hehai University (Nanjing 210098, China)

Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-06-09
About author:Zhang Yingjin is a Visiting Chair Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China, and Professor of Literature at University of California, San Diego, USA. His research covers literature, film, urban culture and cultural history. His publications include eleven English books, eleven Chinese books, and over 150 research articles in Chinese, English, German, Spanish, Portuguese and Korean. Yi Qianliang is Associate Professor at Hehai University (Nanjing 210098, China).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 明星研究视明星为“多重意义的建构”，即预先假定存在稳定清晰的意义体系，可供解构与辨析。表演理论不再把意义看成“被建构”的，而视其为“联接”的结果，充满巧合、即兴和多元并置。将表演理论与明星研究有效结合，有助于探究更丰富的电影手段与表演策略。本文以梁朝伟“消除自我”的复现式表演为例，探寻一种清幽灵动的进路，游走于在场与缺席之间，创生华语电影独特的游戏和中介区间，不断挑战僵化的思维和认知习惯，彰显出对历史和现实进行更替和改易的无限可能。

关键词: 华语电影, 表演理论, 明星研究, 游戏, 中介区间, 改易

Abstract: Star studies sees film stars as "structured polysemy" and anticipates a salient system of meaning for us to decode and appreciate. Performance theory treats meaning as "conjunctural" rather than "structured" and privileges coincident, improvisation and juxtaposition. Approaching star studies through performance theory helps explore a wealth of filmic techniques and performance tactics. This article focuses on Tony Leung Chiu-Wai's "self-effacing" performance of repetition and examines special cases of play and liminality as well presence and absence in Chinese cinema. These cases challenge our conventional habit of thought and cognition and reveal an unlimited potential of alternative and alteration vis-à-vis history and reality.

Key words: Chinese cinema, performance theory, star studies, play, liminality, alteration

张英进, 易前良. 华语电影中的游戏与中介区间——表演理论和明星研究结合的进路[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(2): 21-31.

Zhang Yingjin, Yi Qianliang. Play and Liminality in Chinese Cinema: Star Studies in the Perspective of Performance Theory[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(2): 21-31.

Arthur, Paul. “Review of In the Mood for Love.” Cineaste 26.3 (2001): 40-41.
Austin, Thomas, and Martin Barker, eds. Contemporary Hollywood Stardom. London: Arnold, 2003.
Bettinson, Gary. “Happy together?: Generic Hybridity in 2046 and In the Mood for Love.” Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema. Ed. Warren Buckland. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 167-86.
Brunette, Peter. Wong Kar-wai. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2005.
Bruno, Giuliana. “Surface, Fabric, Weave: The Fashioned World of Wong Kar-wai.” Fashion in Film. Ed. Adrienne Munich. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011. 83-105.
Butler, Jeremy. “The Star System and Hollywood.” The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Eds. John Hill and Pamela Church Gibson. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 342–53.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Chang, Eileen. Afterword. “Why Did She Do It?” Lust, Caution: The Story. By Schamus, James. New York: Anchor Books, 2007. 63-68.
Chang, Hsiao-hung. “Transnational Affect: Cold Anger, Hot Tears and Lust, Caution.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 35.1 (2008): 31-50.
Chi, Robert. “Exhibitionism: Lust, Caution.” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 3.2 (2009): 177-87.
Ciment, Michel, and Niogret Hubert. “Entretien avec Wong Kar-Wai.” Positif 477 (2000): 76-80.
Conquerwood, Dwight. “Performance Studies: Intervention and Radical Research.” The Drama Review 20 (2002): 325-41.
Donald, Stephanie Hemelryk. “Tang Wei: Sex, the City and the Scapegoat in Lust, Caution.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2010): 46-68.
Dyer, Richard. Stars. London: British Film Institute, 1979.
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Gledhill, Christine, ed. Stardom: Industry of Desire. London: Routledge, 1991.
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959.
Hollinger, Karen. The Actress: Hollywood Acting and the Female Star. London: Routledge, 2006.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. New York: Harper, 1970.
Khoo, Olivia. “Love in Ruins: Spectral Bodies in Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love.” Embodied Modernities: Corporeality, Representation, and Chinese Cultures. Eds. Fran Martin and Larissa Heinrich. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006. 235-52.
Lee, Leo Ou-fan. “Ang Lee’s Lust, Caution and Its Reception.” Boundary 2, 35.3 (2008): 223-38.
Liao, Hsien-hao Sebastian. “Becoming Modernized or Simply “Modern”: Sex, Chineseness, and Diasporic Consciousness in Lust and Caution.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 36.2 (2010): 181-211
Liu, Yichang. “Intersections.” Trans. Nancy Li. Renditions 29/30 (1988): 84-101.
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks. South Bend, IN: Gateway, 1962.
Nochimson, Martha P. “Lies and Loneliness: An Interview with Tony Leung Chiu Wai.” Cinéaste 30.4 (2005): 16-17.
Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge, 1993.
Pollock, Della. “Performance Trouble.” The Sage Handbook of Performance Studies. Eds. D. Soyini Madison and Judith Hamera. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006. 1-8.
Rayns, Tony. “Charisma Express.” Sight and Sound 10.1 (2000): 34-36.
Schechner, Richard. Performance Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2002.
Shen, Vivian. “History, Fiction, and Film: Lust, Caution Revisited.” Asian Cinema 22.2 (2012): 305-21.
Tan, Yuh-yi. “Resisting the Lure of the Fetish: Between Abjection and Fetishism in Kar Wai Wong’s In the Mood for Love.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 36.2 (2010): 149-79.
Teo, Stephen. “Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love: Like a Ritual in Transfigured Time.” Senses of Cinema 13 (2001). .
- - -. “2046: A Matter of Time, a Labour of Love.” Sense of Cinema 35 (2005). .
- - -. Wong Kar-wai. London: British Film Institute, 2005.
Turner, Victor. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1974.
- - -. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1982.
- - -. “Body, Brain, and Culture.” Zygon 18.3 (1983): 221-45.
Wang, Xiaoping. “Making a Historical Fable: The Narrative Strategy of Lust, Caution and Its Social Repercussions.” Journal of Contemporary China 19.65 (2010): 573-90.
Wong, Kar-wai. Tête-bêche: A Wong Kar Wai Project. Hong Kong: Block 2 Pictures, 2000.
Yu, Sabrina Qiong. “Vulnerable Chinese Stars: From Xizi to Film Worker.” A Companion to Chinese Cinema. Ed. Yingjin Zhang. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. 218-38.
Yue, Audrey. “In the Mood for Love: Intersections of Hong Kong’s Modernity.” Chinese Films in Focus II. Ed. Chris Berry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 144-52.
张爱玲：《色，戒》，收入《惘然集》，《张爱玲全集》，第12卷。台北：皇冠，1991年。第9-36页。
[- - -. “Lust, Caution.” The Complete Works of Eileen Chang. Vol. 12. Taipei: Huangguan, 1991. 9-36.]
Zhang, Yingjin. “Witness outside History: Play for Alteration in Modern Chinese Culture.” Modernism/Modernity 20.2 (2013): 349-69.

[1]	韦施伊. 走向融合的元宇宙：电子游戏与数字身体之变 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2023, 43(1): 52-60.
[2]	姜宇辉. 庞大宇宙中的小小梦魇——暗黑生态与电子游戏的噩梦诗学 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2022, 42(3): 56-67.
[3]	何明星, 韩颖怡. 时空、意义与叙述——罗伯—格里耶“游戏”观念的文学阐释 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(4): 35-47.
[4]	李坚怀, 赵光亚. 《故事新编》的“非小说性”——论文学游戏之于鲁迅历史书写的文体效应 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2020, 40(2): 130-138.
[5]	赵佳. 法国当代小说中的巴洛克反讽——“以游戏小说”派为例 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39(6): 168-174.
[6]	刘彦顺. 游戏冲动何以在时间中扬弃时间？——论席勒美学思想中的时间性问题之二 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(2): 173-182.
[7]	路程. 从文本游戏到暴力起源：论德里达与基拉尔的摹仿观念 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2016, 36(3): 128-135.
[8]	卢文超. 是一场什么游戏？——布尔迪厄的文学场与贝克尔的艺术界之比较 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(6): 85-94.
[9]	周潞鹭. 超越“改编模式”：“扩散性文学”的当代特征 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(5): 205-211.
[10]	竺洪波. “游戏”背后的多重隐喻——对胡适《西游记》“游戏”说的新解释 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(1): 196-203.
[11]	张念. 《收租院》：作为政治的主题公园 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2013, 33(6): 77-83.