欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 148-157.

• 现当代文论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

整体性思路:政治与美学的变奏——论20世纪以来“文艺大众化”话语模式的嬗变

韩芸华   

  1. 陕西师范大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2023-03-05 发布日期:2023-03-10
  • 作者简介:韩芸华,陕西师范大学文学院比较文学与世界文学专业在读博士生,忻州师范学院中文系讲师,主要从事文学理论与西方文论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党文艺制度史研究”[项目编号:21&ZD256]、陕西师范大学中国语言文学学科科教协同育人科研项目“中国马克思主义文学批评中的人民性研究”[项目编号:2022KJXTB02]的阶段性成果。

Integrated Thought: Variations between Politics and Aesthetics — The Transmutation of the Discursive Modes of “Popularization of Literature and Art” since the Twentieth Century

Han Yunhua   

  1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature at Shaanxi Normal University
  • Online:2023-03-05 Published:2023-03-10
  • About author:Han Yunhua is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature at Shaanxi Normal University, and a lecturer in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature at Xinzhou Teachers University. Han's research areas cover literary theory and Western literary theory.
  • Supported by:
    This article is supported by the Major Project of National Social Sciences Fund (21&ZD256) and Science and Education Collaborative Educational Research Project in Chinese Language and Literature at Shaanxi Normal University (2022KJXTB02).

摘要: 文艺大众化作为20世纪以来中国文艺思潮中的主流观念,影响着中国文学的发展方向。纵观20世纪以来文艺大众化历程,其言说的主导话语模式可以概括为五四“启蒙话语”、20世纪30年代“大众话语”以及两个《讲话》确立的“人民话语”三种。这三种话语模式在嬗变过程中经历实践主体与客体的置换和调整,话语模式变迁的背后其实是文艺本体论与功用论之间的对峙和交锋。20世纪以来的文艺大众化既是政治革命大环境下的产物,又是“人的文学”和“人民文学”美学原则相互冲突、不断调适,并走向平衡的一个过程。可以说,20世纪以来文艺大众化话语模式的嬗变正是政治与美学双重变奏的过程。

关键词: 文艺大众化; , 话语模式; , 话语变迁; , 政治; , 美学

Abstract:  As a mainstream conceptualization of Chinese literature and art since the 20th century, the popularization of literature and art has produced profound influence on the development of Chinese literature. The 20th century saw three dominant patterns of discourse: the “enlightenment discourse” during the May Fourth Movement, the “discourse of the masses” in the 1930s, and the “discourse of the people” established by the two Speeches. As the three modes evolved, they witnessed the exchange and adjustment of practical subject and object as well as the conflict between literary ontology and functionalism. The popularization of literature and art was not only a product of the twentieth-century political revolution, but also a process wherein the aesthetic principles of “human literature” and “people's literature” constantly conflicted and intersected with each other. Therefore, it can be concluded that the transmutation of the discursive modes of popularization of literature and art since the twentieth century was both politically and aesthetically engaged.

Key words: popularization of literature and art; , discursive modes; , transmutation of discursive modes; , politics; , aesthetics