欢迎访问《文艺理论研究》,

文艺理论研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 201-210.

• 西方文论与美学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

文学文本意义生成的知识谱系考察

付昌玲   

  1. 山东大学文学院

  • 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-26
  • 作者简介:付昌玲,文学博士,山东大学文学院副教授,主要从事西方文学与文论研究。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社科基金项目西方文学文本理论知识增长的历史与逻辑研究”[项目编号:19BZW022] 阶段性成果。

A Genealogical Study of the Meaning Generation of Literary Text 

Fu Changling   

  1. School of Literature, Shandong University

  • Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-26
  • About author:Fu Changling, Ph.D., is an associate professor at the School of Literature, Shandong University. Her research interests include Western literature and literary theories.
  • Supported by:

    This article is supported by the General Project of National Social Sciences Fund (19BZW022).

摘要:

文本作为文论研究的重要概念,不同时期讨论中均有体现。文本呈现对语言的态度及意义的指向。依据语言形态变化和对意义的不同理解,文本大致可分为封闭文本和动态文本。自古希腊基督教社会,人们生活在稳定的意义同一性之中,文本语言透明,意义委付于神明且完全封闭。从文艺复兴开始,属人的权力被抬升前所未有的高度,文本意义从揭示神启降格为彰显人性。尽管信仰基础丧失,但人文主义仍保有稳定的同一当代社会,人自身意义被拆解,文本依赖的外部同一性随之消泯。语言由透明为晦暗,文本研究从外部转向内部。新批评派和结构主义者认为文本向内封闭,并利用语言分析解读文本,图在矛盾和多重结构中发现稳定意义。其努力终因信仰缺失而导致意义分化与混乱,文本由封闭走向自我拆解。但此拆解不仅未导致意义空无,反而赋予其以临时在场的勇气。它要求文本直面他者,向无限敞开,在互文中寻求稳定的同一性,即交流的同一性。在我与你互动中,文本建构出公平对话场域,由此拯救文本意义的失落。

关键词:

文本;同一性;封闭;解构;互文 ,

Abstract:

As a key concept in literary theory, “text” has been discussed during different periods. Text presents an attitude towards language and a reference to meaning. Varied language forms and disparate interpretations of meaning have given rise to two types of text: closed text and dynamic text. From ancient Greece to early Christian society, people lived with consistent meaning and identity; their language was transparent and meaning was dictated by gods/the God. From the Renaissance onwards, human power was promoted to an unprecedentedly high level, and meaning was considered a display of humanity rather than divine revelation. Notwithstanding an absence of religious certainty, humanism still maintained its identity. In modern society, humanism is deconstructed, followed by the disintegration of external identity. As a result, language loses its transparency and turns obscure, and text research begins to seek its meaning from the inside. New critics and structuralists hold the view of a closed text and attempt to reveal its innermost contradictions and multi-layered structures through speech analysis. Their attempts, still aiming to locate a stable meaning, fail due to an absence of religious certainty. Although closed text deconstructs itself, this does not lead to nihilism. In contrast, it allows for a temporary presence of meaning, which requires the text to stay open to the other and infinity, pursuing a more communicative identity based on intertextuality. The text constructs a dynamic and fair field of dialogue that involves an ever-changing relationship between “you” and “I”. Meaning loses its stability but is redeemed in intertextuality.   

Key words:

 text, identity, closedness, deconstruction, intertextuality